Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Source: Next Dodge Durango to be called Magnum

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 19, 2010 | 06:31 PM
  #1  
95redLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,505
From: Charleston, WV
Source: Next Dodge Durango to be called Magnum

According to an Autoblog source, Dodge will abandon the Durango nameplate for the model's replacement due for 2012. In place of that two-generation designator, Chrysler is exhuming the Magnum nameplate, a moniker used on the low-slung wagon built on Chrysler's LX platform up until 2008. The new Magnum is expected to be built atop the 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee chassis (itself riding on Mercedes-Benz-derived architecture) and skew more toward the crossover segment than the previous rough-and-ready SUV.

Our source originally showed us a screen capture of a Pentastar service training software page on its Chrysler Academy Learning Center confirming the Magnum's existence (shown above), but at that time, he wasn't clear what the vehicle was. Since then, our man has learned through a Chrysler zone manager at a New York dealer's meeting that the line item in question is indeed the next Durango. A secondary source close to the situation confirmed to Autoblog that a name change for the new vehicle is in the cards and that Magnum is under serious consideration, but he was unclear as to whether a final decision had been made.

The Durango was introduced in 1998 and immediately found success riding the crest of the SUV boom. A second-generation debuted for 2004 and ran through the 2009 model year, but the larger redesigned model didn't meet with the same sort of success as its predecessor, struggling to deal with the collapse of the body-on-frame SUV market and increasingly plentiful crossover options.

It isn't immediately clear what the reasoning is behind Chrysler's apparent name change strategy, especially as the 2005-2008 Magnum itself wasn't considered much of a sales success (it was consistently outsold by its LX platform stablemates, the Chrysler 300 and Dodge Charger). That said, with the model being more CUV-like than a body-on-frame bruiser, the change seems to make some sense. Further, Magnum remains a powerful nameplate, and the Pentastar has a long history of employing it for any number of different products, including a large B-platform coupe in the late 1970s, a range of engines, and a Mexican-market K-car model in the '80s. Thanks for the tip, Michael!

http://www.autoblog.com/2010/01/19/s...called-magnum/
Old Jan 19, 2010 | 07:27 PM
  #2  
z28 justin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 427
From: Perrysburg, OH
So will we be able to buy a true SUV in the next few years? I like having the ability to tow stuff if need be while having room for friends in the back.
Old Jan 19, 2010 | 08:12 PM
  #3  
OutsiderIROC-Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,688
From: Middle of Kansas
Originally Posted by z28 justin
So will we be able to buy a true SUV in the next few years?
Probably not...
Old Jan 19, 2010 | 08:25 PM
  #4  
Sixer-Bird's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,215
From: Coppell, Texas
Just means that I'm going to have to fight through a lot of confusion when people ask what kind of car I drive.
Old Jan 19, 2010 | 08:41 PM
  #5  
Mustang Killer57's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 279
Originally Posted by z28 justin
So will we be able to buy a true SUV in the next few years? I like having the ability to tow stuff if need be while having room for friends in the back.
Sure you will. But it seems we are going full circle back to the time period where Manufacturers had 1 or 2 true SUVs, not what seems like the majority of everyones lineup.
A traditional expedition/surburban mixed with explorer/Jimmy type vehicle atleast will remain. And probably a few more in between.
I think the way things are going Minivans will about die off before anything
Old Jan 19, 2010 | 08:43 PM
  #6  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Typo?

Originally Posted by z28 justin
So will we be able to buy a true SUV in the next few years? I like having the ability to tow stuff if need be while having room for friends in the back.
Tahoe, Suburban, and Expedition.
Old Jan 19, 2010 | 09:17 PM
  #7  
z28 justin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 427
From: Perrysburg, OH
I wish they'd bring back the Bronco, but back to topic. I find it interesting that it will share a platform with the next GC. After reading more, it sounds like this thing will still be able to tow 7400lbs which I think is actually more than the current WK. Not a bad setup if it gets some better mileage.
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 12:02 AM
  #8  
99SilverSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,463
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by Sixer-Bird
Just means that I'm going to have to fight through a lot of confusion when people ask what kind of car I drive.
Yea that should be fun.

IMO Dodge has over used the Magnum name too much already before slapping on this new truck. It's an engine line, a RWD full size wagon and now a crossover SUV.
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 12:18 AM
  #9  
daddytrav's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 236
From: West Salem,IL
Originally Posted by 99SilverSS
Yea that should be fun.

IMO Dodge has over used the Magnum name too much already before slapping on this new truck. It's an engine line, a RWD full size wagon and now a crossover SUV.
Dont forget this magnum

Name:  magnum.jpg
Views: 20
Size:  116.4 KB
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 09:12 AM
  #10  
poSSum's Avatar
Disciple
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,479
Originally Posted by z28 justin
So will we be able to buy a true SUV in the next few years? I like having the ability to tow stuff if need be while having room for friends in the back.
When we get to the point where we have to replace our Trailblazer SS as a tow vehicle we may look at the turbodiesels offered by VW, BMW & Audi. They all have good tow ratings, lots of torque and would probably get better mileage.
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 09:33 AM
  #11  
muckz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,402
From: Toronto, ON Canada
Originally Posted by poSSum
When we get to the point where we have to replace our Trailblazer SS as a tow vehicle we may look at the turbodiesels offered by VW, BMW & Audi. They all have good tow ratings, lots of torque and would probably get better mileage.
And a price that's double that of American SUVs

Grand Cherokee was available with diesel, is that still the case? Didn't see the option on Canadian Jeep website.
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 03:13 PM
  #12  
OutsiderIROC-Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,688
From: Middle of Kansas
Originally Posted by muckz
And a price that's double that of American SUVs

Grand Cherokee was available with diesel, is that still the case? Didn't see the option on Canadian Jeep website.
I wasn't aware of a diesel being available in a Grand Cherokee, but I could be wrong.
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 03:29 PM
  #13  
Aaron91RS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 162
From: St. Louis, MO
Take a known name that they took money and time to build up and then instead get rid of it and name it after a condom.
Oh wait the name comes from a station wagon. Even worse.
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 03:40 PM
  #14  
Sixer-Bird's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,215
From: Coppell, Texas
WK GC's had a 3.0L bluetec diesel available for awhile. not sure if its in the plans for the new one, since it was sourced from MB.

BTW, I agree about the Magnum name being WAY overused by Chrysler. Good name, but overused. They should call this new car the "Dodge Johnson", keeping with the phallic theme.

Last edited by Sixer-Bird; Jan 21, 2010 at 04:56 PM.
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 04:10 PM
  #15  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
"condom"? "phallic"?

You "boys" do realize that the Dodge Magnum predates Trojan's Magnum; and even that was preceded by the Smith & Wesson Magnum by about 40 years.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:36 PM.