Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

A Radical Fix for General Motors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-02-2008, 10:41 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jg95z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oakland, California
Posts: 9,710
A Radical Fix for General Motors

Interesting article. Very similar to some of the ideas thrown around this forum:

http://www.businessweek.com/managing...122_788350.htm

In a nutshell:
Split the company in two: Hive off Chevy, Buick, and Cadillac, and then liquidate the rest, including the lumbering, old high-cost setup
Radical Proposal
Here's my radical proposal for a heart transplant to save General Motors:

1. Divide GM into two companies, the first composed of Chevrolet (including trucks), Buick, and Cadillac.

2. Install new management and a new board of directors, move the headquarters to a new location, and create an empowering culture for all employees.

3. Negotiate new employee agreements with wages and benefits competitive to those of foreign producers' U.S. factories (around $44 per hour, not GM's current level of $73), including health plans and pensions comparable to its foreign competitors.

4. Retain only GM's most productive American and foreign factories—those that operate at greater than 80% of capacity.

5. Embark on an aggressive new-product development program to make its autos fully competitive in engineering, features, and styling within five years.

6. Commit to a fleet average of 40 mpg by 2015 and 50 mpg by 2020, competitive with European standards, with a mix of hybrids, electric cars, lighter vehicles, and efficiency improvements.

7. Re-charter the dealer network for these three brands with fewer, healthier dealers.

8. Establish a viable capital structure enabling this company to operate with sound cash balances and a reasonable debt-to-equity structure.
But is it viable?
jg95z28 is offline  
Old 12-02-2008, 10:49 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
muckz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Toronto, ON Canada
Posts: 2,402
Originally Posted by jg95z28
Interesting article. Very similar to some of the ideas thrown around this forum:

http://www.businessweek.com/managing...122_788350.htm

In a nutshell:



But is it viable?
Fleet average of 40 mpg by 2015? Absolutely not. And to embark on aggressive engineering... with what money, if it may not be around come March 2009?

Sounds like a list of what someone would like to see, without delving into how to get it done and whether it's viable.
muckz is offline  
Old 12-02-2008, 10:50 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Z28x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 10,287
What would the 2nd GM company be?
Z28x is offline  
Old 12-02-2008, 10:51 AM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jg95z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oakland, California
Posts: 9,710
Originally Posted by muckz
Sounds like a list of what someone would like to see, without delving into how to get it done and whether it's viable.
Agreed. What amazes me is that guys like this get press, and we have folks around here that actually are more articulate and better informed on what is actually viable.
jg95z28 is offline  
Old 12-02-2008, 10:53 AM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jg95z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oakland, California
Posts: 9,710
Originally Posted by Z28x
What would the 2nd GM company be?
It doesn't matter, because it would be liquidated. He's proposing it as a holding place for all the rotten pieces of GM that aren't worth saving.
jg95z28 is offline  
Old 12-03-2008, 02:30 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
SCNGENNFTHGEN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 1,581
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by jg95z28
It doesn't matter, because it would be liquidated. He's proposing it as a holding place for all the rotten pieces of GM that aren't worth saving.
Oh you mean that's NOT how people feel about the whole company? Coulda fooled me...
SCNGENNFTHGEN is offline  
Old 12-03-2008, 02:40 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
skier5150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Bellevue,WA
Posts: 2
$75 an hour is hogwash. That figure came from mgmt, who added wages,benefits, and health benefits and retirements pay, dicvided by ONLY the people worklng,. Not a valid figure, but it has cauht fire in the infndignation about the bailouts. 5% of the bank bailouts (to the poeple who ran this country into the ground) woudl cover the auto industry fine.
skier5150 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ChrisFrez
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
0
03-01-2015 01:33 PM
ChrisFrez
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
0
01-18-2015 08:05 AM
ChrisFrez
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
2
12-07-2014 11:32 AM
guionM
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
10
09-08-2002 11:08 PM
centric
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
6
08-15-2002 09:04 PM



Quick Reply: A Radical Fix for General Motors



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:25 PM.