Pics: Challenger on the Streets
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,960
From: San Diego, CA
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,597
From: Mack and Bewick
Re: Pics: Challenger on the Streets
It doesen't set me on fire.
I would be much more interested in a modern Chrysler version... I think that would make more sense then them trying to put 30-50k of them on the road like they are predicting.
I would be much more interested in a modern Chrysler version... I think that would make more sense then them trying to put 30-50k of them on the road like they are predicting.
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 873
From: Chicago Burbs
Re: Pics: Challenger on the Streets
It just doesn't look real to me, if that makes any sense. It looks like it is straight out of a cartoon for some reason. The tail light section, while cool just looks odd, and the whole car I dunno... just seems odd, it is cool but still just very odd.
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 852
From: Nude Bra Fulls, Texas
Re: Pics: Challenger on the Streets
I thought I really liked it when I saw it at the Dallas 5th gen showing, but these pictures are making me second guess myself. 
I do like how they let people sit in it, though.
I do like how they let people sit in it, though.
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Re: Pics: Challenger on the Streets
Looks perfectly fine and proportionate to me.
If it were parked next to a Mustang or Malibu or something, then I could at least have something to compare it's size too. But I don't see anything at all that indicates that it's massive.
Reminds me of how people piled on the 300 as a large massive car when it first came out, yet the thing was no wider than an Impala, and much shorter.
Funny how a car 3" wider than 4th gen & Camaro's 75", 3" longer than the Camaro's 194", and 4" taller than the concept Camaro's height of 53" makes a car supposedly too big.
If it were parked next to a Mustang or Malibu or something, then I could at least have something to compare it's size too. But I don't see anything at all that indicates that it's massive.
Reminds me of how people piled on the 300 as a large massive car when it first came out, yet the thing was no wider than an Impala, and much shorter.
Funny how a car 3" wider than 4th gen & Camaro's 75", 3" longer than the Camaro's 194", and 4" taller than the concept Camaro's height of 53" makes a car supposedly too big.
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,232
From: Orlando, FL USA
Re: Pics: Challenger on the Streets
Looks good. Only thing I continue to dislike about the car is the long piece across the rear end. Gives the taillamps no shape or form at all. IMO they should put a small blacked out or body colored section in the middle with the word DODGE on it and it would look better.
Registered User
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
Re: Pics: Challenger on the Streets
I think it looks absolutely awesome.
Unfortunately.....2 tons+? I complain about the likely weight of the new Camaro, and this one will certainly be more than that. Yuk.
Unfortunately.....2 tons+? I complain about the likely weight of the new Camaro, and this one will certainly be more than that. Yuk.
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Re: Pics: Challenger on the Streets
Looks good to me, it doesn't look small, but it also doesn't look too big. I need to see it parked next to a Mustang or something
Last edited by Z28x; May 15, 2006 at 08:22 AM.