The Official CTS-V HP number is....

Z28x · 2008-06-09 18:20:58

556HP and 551 lb-ft of torque:metal: http://jalopnik.com/395504/2009-cadillac-cts+v-made-official-gets-556-hp

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jun 9, 2008 | 01:20 PM

Z28x

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Jan 2000

Posts: 10,285

From: Albany, NY

The Official CTS-V HP number is....

556HP and 551 lb-ft of torque

http://jalopnik.com/395504/2009-cadi...al-gets-556-hp

Jun 9, 2008 | 01:29 PM

texas94z

Registered User

Joined: Oct 2007

Posts: 374

From: Denton, Texas

Bad ***. I want that car as my dd so bad.

Jun 9, 2008 | 01:37 PM

Blown350ZZ4

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2003

Posts: 727

From: Alcohaulin Ass

F*ckin A

Jun 9, 2008 | 01:45 PM

Tokuzumi

Registered User

Joined: Sep 1999

Posts: 602

From: Alpharetta, GA

Is that 556hp with a wink, or is that a real number? I'd be curious to see the vette and caddy on a dyno, and compare what the real difference in power is.

Jun 9, 2008 | 02:00 PM

HuJass

Registered User

Joined: Apr 2000

Posts: 2,224

From: CNY

The Car Connection is reporting a 0-60 time of 3.9 seconds.

Jun 9, 2008 | 02:09 PM

TA76

Registered User

Joined: Jun 1999

Posts: 426

From: Birmingham, AL, USA

I had to drop the wife's SRX off for service last week and checked out the new CTS. What a ride, I can't imagine how much better the V will be. For what it is worth, the guy at the dealership thought the V would be around 70K.

Jun 9, 2008 | 03:22 PM

detltu

Registered User

Joined: Feb 2003

Posts: 658

From: Madisonville, Louisiana

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tokuzumi

Is that 556hp with a wink, or is that a real number? I'd be curious to see the vette and caddy on a dyno, and compare what the real difference in power is.

Should be the real number with the new SAE standard. I believe all GM engines are tested under this proceedure. It leaves very little room for them to under or overrate the engines.