New Elky?
#1
New Elky?
Remember a few years ago when the Commodore was tauted as the next Elky? Any chance we'l see anything like that in the next ten years? I mean performance trucks are all anyone ever does anymore. Trucks like the S-10, Ranger get lowered and V8s put in them and they are now show trucks. That, and 15" lift F150s.
Anyone else think bringing back a Elky in low-volume form would be a good idea?
It'd be a lot better looking than the Colorado, that's for sure.
Anyone else think bringing back a Elky in low-volume form would be a good idea?
It'd be a lot better looking than the Colorado, that's for sure.
#2
#3
Last edited by bulldoguav; 01-26-2003 at 04:04 PM.
#4
Originally posted by bulldoguav
Sure, but I'm partial to my old one...
http://www.imagestation.com/picture/...2/fd2e87f3.jpg
Sure, but I'm partial to my old one...
http://www.imagestation.com/picture/...2/fd2e87f3.jpg
I don't usually like those years, but that looks dang good.
#6
Re: New Elky?
Originally posted by bulldoguav
Remember a few years ago when the Commodore was tauted as the next Elky? Any chance we'l see anything like that in the next ten years? ....
Remember a few years ago when the Commodore was tauted as the next Elky? Any chance we'l see anything like that in the next ten years? ....
Of all the Holdens, the UTE needed the least amount of redoing to be imported into the US (especially if imported as a pickup truck). Even the fuel tank is already relocated!
The development that went into the GTO was initially planned for more than just one vehicle. At the moment, seems the plan is to wait till GM North America get's their version of the VE before they take it up again.
Unless the Tariff's repealed very soon (it was brought up in the Bush Administration a couple of months ago), don't count on seeing El Camino return till sometime after 2006.
#7
Its not a truck.... Its a car with a BED. Its on a CAR frame.. Its a freaking car. Thats not the reason. If DCX can call the PT cruser a truck than GM can make the UTE a car because it is a car.
#8
Originally posted by Evil Turbo SS
Its not a truck.... Its a car with a BED. Its on a CAR frame.. Its a freaking car. Thats not the reason. If DCX can call the PT cruser a truck than GM can make the UTE a car because it is a car.
Its not a truck.... Its a car with a BED. Its on a CAR frame.. Its a freaking car. Thats not the reason. If DCX can call the PT cruser a truck than GM can make the UTE a car because it is a car.
#9
For those who don't know the Ute SS
Here's the Ute SS in all of it's Aussie glory...
The Ute SS
Man... I might end up moving to Austrailia myself... just for the cars they have over there...
Know how much this costs in USD? $23,100.
And yes... that includes the 5.7L.
I'LL TAKE IT!
The Ute SS
Man... I might end up moving to Austrailia myself... just for the cars they have over there...
Know how much this costs in USD? $23,100.
And yes... that includes the 5.7L.
I'LL TAKE IT!
#10
Originally posted by Evil Turbo SS
Its not a truck.... Its a car with a BED. Its on a CAR frame.. Its a freaking car. Thats not the reason. If DCX can call the PT cruser a truck than GM can make the UTE a car because it is a car.
Its not a truck.... Its a car with a BED. Its on a CAR frame.. Its a freaking car. Thats not the reason. If DCX can call the PT cruser a truck than GM can make the UTE a car because it is a car.
It's classified as a truck, and would face a 25% tarriff. The fact it's based off car components is irrelevent. As you pointed out, a PT Cruzer is a truck according to it's classification, even though it's basically a rebodied Neon. The old El Caminos were classified as trucks as well. Even GMC sold a version of it.
Also, it works out towards GM's benefit to classify the UTE as a truck. Alot less money to certify it to US standards (why it was initially planned to be here possibly before GTO was).
Just for the record, seems Mr Lutz was even hotter on importing the UTE than he was the GTO. In short, if there's a way to get around the tarrif, he'll have it found.
#13
Originally posted by Pandamonkey
Damn! That Ute SS has 465 lbs of Torque!!!
That's it, I'm moving to Australia.
Damn! That Ute SS has 465 lbs of Torque!!!
That's it, I'm moving to Australia.
#14
Originally posted by guionM
Check into it yourself.
It's classified as a truck, and would face a 25% tarriff.
Check into it yourself.
It's classified as a truck, and would face a 25% tarriff.
The easy solution would be to import the Cross8, which is an enormous crew-cab UTE concept, due for production this year. It would be equipped with AWD, unlike the current Ute, and might be a very hot product. Crew cab trucks sell, and a car with this body style would have no competion, save the underpowered Subaru Baja.
The only downside is that a few people might buy an LS1 Cross8 instead of an Avalanche or Envoy XUV. When you consider that GM literally OWNS the crossover pick up market, internal competition might not be a good thing for the bottom line.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post