Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

New Elky?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 26, 2003 | 03:32 PM
  #1  
bulldoguav's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 143
From: Marietta, GA
New Elky?

Remember a few years ago when the Commodore was tauted as the next Elky? Any chance we'l see anything like that in the next ten years? I mean performance trucks are all anyone ever does anymore. Trucks like the S-10, Ranger get lowered and V8s put in them and they are now show trucks. That, and 15" lift F150s.

Anyone else think bringing back a Elky in low-volume form would be a good idea?

It'd be a lot better looking than the Colorado, that's for sure.
Old Jan 26, 2003 | 03:54 PM
  #2  
0toinsanein5.4sec's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,381
You mean like this?

I would love to have it here
Old Jan 26, 2003 | 04:02 PM
  #3  
bulldoguav's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 143
From: Marietta, GA
Originally posted by 0toinsanein5.4sec
You mean like this?

I would love to have it here
Sure, but I'm partial to my old one...

http://www.imagestation.com/picture/...2/fd2e87f3.jpg


Last edited by bulldoguav; Jan 26, 2003 at 04:04 PM.
Old Jan 26, 2003 | 05:03 PM
  #4  
JEDCamino's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 857
From: Murfreesboro, TN
Originally posted by bulldoguav
Sure, but I'm partial to my old one...

http://www.imagestation.com/picture/...2/fd2e87f3.jpg


I don't usually like those years, but that looks dang good.
Old Jan 27, 2003 | 11:41 AM
  #5  
Caps94ZODG's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,748
From: New England
who did that elky with the Impy rear??? is it in Aus? or built here on a FWD Impy?? any other pics of it? I like it
Old Jan 27, 2003 | 04:30 PM
  #6  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Re: New Elky?

Originally posted by bulldoguav
Remember a few years ago when the Commodore was tauted as the next Elky? Any chance we'l see anything like that in the next ten years? ....
As far as I can tell, the biggest thing holding it back is the 25% tarriff on all imported trucks. My understanding is that's why it wasn't imported before the Monaro/GTO.

Of all the Holdens, the UTE needed the least amount of redoing to be imported into the US (especially if imported as a pickup truck). Even the fuel tank is already relocated!

The development that went into the GTO was initially planned for more than just one vehicle. At the moment, seems the plan is to wait till GM North America get's their version of the VE before they take it up again.

Unless the Tariff's repealed very soon (it was brought up in the Bush Administration a couple of months ago), don't count on seeing El Camino return till sometime after 2006.
Old Jan 28, 2003 | 02:21 AM
  #7  
Evil Turbo SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 781
From: Houston TX (Chicago/Evanston IL)
Its not a truck.... Its a car with a BED. Its on a CAR frame.. Its a freaking car. Thats not the reason. If DCX can call the PT cruser a truck than GM can make the UTE a car because it is a car.
Old Jan 28, 2003 | 06:04 AM
  #8  
jrp4uc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,724
From: Hebron, KY
Originally posted by Evil Turbo SS
Its not a truck.... Its a car with a BED. Its on a CAR frame.. Its a freaking car. Thats not the reason. If DCX can call the PT cruser a truck than GM can make the UTE a car because it is a car.
A large percentage of SUVs are based off of cars as well, that doesn't mean they are classified as cars. Especially in a day when trucks are matching the level of luxury in some cars, (IMO) car + bed = truck.
Old Jan 28, 2003 | 08:52 AM
  #9  
Mikes25thAnnTA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 244
From: From Akron, OH to Raleigh, NC
For those who don't know the Ute SS

Here's the Ute SS in all of it's Aussie glory...

The Ute SS

Man... I might end up moving to Austrailia myself... just for the cars they have over there...

Know how much this costs in USD? $23,100.

And yes... that includes the 5.7L.

I'LL TAKE IT!
Old Jan 28, 2003 | 09:08 AM
  #10  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Originally posted by Evil Turbo SS
Its not a truck.... Its a car with a BED. Its on a CAR frame.. Its a freaking car. Thats not the reason. If DCX can call the PT cruser a truck than GM can make the UTE a car because it is a car.
Check into it yourself.

It's classified as a truck, and would face a 25% tarriff. The fact it's based off car components is irrelevent. As you pointed out, a PT Cruzer is a truck according to it's classification, even though it's basically a rebodied Neon. The old El Caminos were classified as trucks as well. Even GMC sold a version of it.

Also, it works out towards GM's benefit to classify the UTE as a truck. Alot less money to certify it to US standards (why it was initially planned to be here possibly before GTO was).

Just for the record, seems Mr Lutz was even hotter on importing the UTE than he was the GTO. In short, if there's a way to get around the tarrif, he'll have it found.
Old Jan 28, 2003 | 11:26 AM
  #11  
Chuck!'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 2,610
From: Cincinnati, OH
What is the 25% chaged based on (price wise)?
Old Jan 28, 2003 | 12:03 PM
  #12  
Pandamonkey's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,417
From: Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Damn! That Ute SS has 465 lbs of Torque!!!
That's it, I'm moving to Australia.
Old Jan 28, 2003 | 12:29 PM
  #13  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Originally posted by Pandamonkey
Damn! That Ute SS has 465 lbs of Torque!!!
That's it, I'm moving to Australia.
That's 465 newton-meters of torque, which is what about 360 ft/lbs? No time to find a conversion calculator right now...
Old Jan 28, 2003 | 12:45 PM
  #14  
redzed's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,954
Originally posted by guionM
Check into it yourself.

It's classified as a truck, and would face a 25% tarriff.
As I understand it, the 25% tarriff only applieds to regular cab pick ups and 2-door SUVS. (That's precisely why the U.S. will never see the short-wheel-base Land Rover Freelander.) In addition, the current Ute lacks a rear bumper - an addition that would require a complete reworking of the tailgate. The Holden Ute might start at $14,000, but add the tarif, redesigned tailgate and the cost of Pacific transhipment, and you might be looking at Silverado Z71 money for a 2WD, V8 El Camino.

The easy solution would be to import the Cross8, which is an enormous crew-cab UTE concept, due for production this year. It would be equipped with AWD, unlike the current Ute, and might be a very hot product. Crew cab trucks sell, and a car with this body style would have no competion, save the underpowered Subaru Baja.

The only downside is that a few people might buy an LS1 Cross8 instead of an Avalanche or Envoy XUV. When you consider that GM literally OWNS the crossover pick up market, internal competition might not be a good thing for the bottom line.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Airshowman
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
2
Jun 17, 2011 11:09 AM
ca1st2010ss
2010 - 2015 Camaro Technical Discussion
8
May 27, 2009 01:46 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:23 PM.