Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Mustang goes to EU to race without a SRA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 15, 2010 | 05:31 PM
  #1  
super83Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,214
From: City of Champions, MA, USA
Mustang goes to EU to race without a SRA

Looks nice but damn that is a big wing

http://www.autoblog.com/2010/04/15/c...ropean-champi/





The Marc VDS Racing Team’s official launch at Gosselies, Belgium was the venue for the world premiere of the all-new Marc VDS Mustang GT3, which will be campaigned in this year’s GT3 European Championship by Belgian Eric De Doncker and Canadian Scott Maxwell.

The latest addition to the GT3 grid weighs in at just 1350kg(2976lbs) and features a 5.3 litre V8 engine, which produces 560BHP. These performance figures, combined with the all-new transaxle on the Ford Mustang Marc VDS GT3 guarantee that the car will be a serious contender during it’s debut season.

The first car, with the chassis number MVDS001/001, was built by the team’s project partner Multimatic in Canada before being shipped to the United Kingdom, where it underwent a successful initial shakedown test at Ford’s European test facility near Luton, Bedfordshire.

De Doncker and Maxwell will race the #98 Ford Mustang Marc VDS GT3, while the drivers for the #99 car will be announced by the Marc VDS Racing Team shortly.

The Marc VDS Racing Team, together with Multimatic, will build additional cars to order, for customer race teams looking for a competitive GT3 package off the shelf. The cost of the Ford Mustang Marc VDS GT3 has yet to be confirmed.

For more information please contact the Ford Mustang Marc VDS GT3 Project Manager, Eric De Doncker, at eric@marcvds-group.com.

Last edited by super83Z; Apr 15, 2010 at 05:34 PM.
Old Apr 15, 2010 | 06:37 PM
  #2  
TOO Z MAXX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 666
From: Stockton, Ca. USA
Transaxle????? Could this be going into a future Mustang
Old Apr 15, 2010 | 08:35 PM
  #3  
SSbaby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,123
From: Melbourne, Australia
That does look nice!

With the IRS in place I'd have to add "Ford, please bring Mustang downunder." to my sig. No wait, it's only the racecar! Doh!
Old Apr 15, 2010 | 10:52 PM
  #4  
Sax1031's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 604
From: Elgin,SC
Ford is getting serious.
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 12:02 AM
  #5  
bossco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,977
From: SeVa
pffttt.. whatever, why dont they just throw in a set of pushrods and a DSG so it can be some generic Camaro/M3 wanna-be instead of a Mustang.
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 12:30 AM
  #6  
MauriSSio's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 378
From: San Jose
just wondering but why do they make the front wheel arches so huge for those types of race cars??
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 07:18 AM
  #7  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
I must have missed the part that says this car has an independent rear suspension. "New transaxle" doesn't necessarily mean new suspension setup.
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 07:35 AM
  #8  
SSbaby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,123
From: Melbourne, Australia
Originally Posted by Z28Wilson
I must have missed the part that says this car has an independent rear suspension. "New transaxle" doesn't necessarily mean new suspension setup.
Don't be lazy. Do some research!

Front Suspension:
Macpherson Strut, Dynamics suspension DSSV 4 way adjustable dampers

Rear Suspension:
Double Wishbone with pushrods, Dynamics suspension DSSV 4 way adjustable dampers

http://www.marcvds.com/gt3/page/the-gt3-car.cfm

Last edited by SSbaby; Apr 16, 2010 at 07:46 AM.
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 07:44 AM
  #9  
soul strife's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 824
From: North of Cincy
Looks good save for the huge wing and chin lip. I'm sure it needs those for this racing series though.
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 08:27 AM
  #10  
1fastdog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,808
From: FL/MI
Originally Posted by Z28Wilson
I must have missed the part that says this car has an independent rear suspension. "New transaxle" doesn't necessarily mean new suspension setup.
It would be rather stupid to design a solid transaxle setup.
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 08:38 AM
  #11  
1fastdog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,808
From: FL/MI
Originally Posted by MauriSSio
just wondering but why do they make the front wheel arches so huge for those types of race cars??
It gets very hot with the engine and brakes doing what they do... Getting air out is key for temp control and minimizing lift.

A splitter will do a lot to keep lift from building under the car, particularly under the hood.

The canard flaring at the wheelwells creates a vacuum which assists in drawing air through the wheels and wheelwells. That can be a plus-plus. Cool the brakes and draw underhood circulation while adding downforce in the process.

The wheelarch size can mean one or two things... The size can be mandated via the rules and/or the heat control mandates having the arches be as large as possible as the frame length and body rules do not allow laying the radiator back.

More overhang is actually a good thing aerowise as it's conducive to getting the air over the car, but the rules for body shape can dictate just how far you can get the leading edge from the production version of a vehicle..

The 'stang is an aero "brick" and it's clear they are going as far as the rules allow to get the splitter and rear wing as far fore and aft as they can.

Last edited by 1fastdog; Apr 16, 2010 at 08:52 AM.
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 09:07 AM
  #12  
SSbaby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,123
From: Melbourne, Australia
Originally Posted by 1fastdog
It gets very hot with the engine and brakes doing what they do... Getting air out is key for temp control and minimizing lift.

A splitter will do a lot to keep lift from building under the car, particularly under the hood.

The canard flaring at the wheelwells creates a vacuum which assists in drawing air through the wheels and wheelwells. That can be a plus-plus. Cool the brakes and draw underhood circulation while adding downforce in the process.

The wheelarch size can mean one or two things... The size can be mandated via the rules and/or the heat control mandates having the arches be as large as possible as the frame length and body rules do not allow laying the radiator back.

More overhang is actually a good thing aerowise as it's conducive to getting the air over the car, but the rules for body shape can dictate just how far you can get the leading edge from the production version of a vehicle..

The 'stang is an aero "brick" and it's clear they are going as far as the rules allow to get the splitter and rear wing as far fore and aft as they can.
Boy you sure know your stuff, 1fastdog!

You're not kidding either with the aero bits because this Mustang is near limousine length at just over 5m!!!

Aero balance is absolutely crucial in this class of racing!
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 09:19 AM
  #13  
1fastdog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,808
From: FL/MI
Originally Posted by SSbaby
Boy you sure know your stuff, 1fastdog!

You're not kidding either with the aero bits because this Mustang is near limousine length at just over 5m!!!

Aero balance is absolutely crucial in this class of racing!
How nice of you to say so... I am always asking questions and digesting what I learn as best I can.

I'm fortunate to have met and have gotten to speak with some folks that truly know their stuff. I have also found that the sharpest engineers are happy to explain the physics and mindset involved in problem solving.

You would be surprised what folks will tell you if you are actually interested. I sometimes marvel at how lucky I am.

Last edited by 1fastdog; Apr 16, 2010 at 09:22 AM.
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 09:34 AM
  #14  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by MauriSSio
just wondering but why do they make the front wheel arches so huge for those types of race cars??
In addition to everything 1fastdog said, it's also important that the arches cover the wheels.
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 10:03 AM
  #15  
SSbaby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,123
From: Melbourne, Australia
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
In addition to everything 1fastdog said, it's also important that the arches cover the wheels.
Although I detect some sarcasm there, you are right. The wheels/tires are 13" wide!!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:21 PM.