Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Motor Trend info on next gen GTO

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-24-2003, 02:45 PM
  #46  
Registered User
 
Jackass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Metairie La.
Posts: 269
Both GuionM and Z284ever bring up valid points.

So is VE just another version of Sigma? How different can they be?

I bet their is VERY little difference between the two.
Jackass is offline  
Old 09-24-2003, 02:53 PM
  #47  
Registered User
 
Bonequark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3
Lutz seems quite pleased with this new platform as a less-expensive V8/RWD solution than the Sigma (it is cheaper than Sigma...that's a big difference). He was quoted as saying this will show up in Pontiac and Chevy models, possibly as soon as 2005.

So the V8/RWD Monte Carlo rumors for 2005 are probably true. The 2007 Camaro seems on track. It's about time.

-Bone
Bonequark is offline  
Old 09-24-2003, 04:37 PM
  #48  
Registered User
 
guionM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The Golden State
Posts: 13,711
I've said it once, and I'll say it again. Don't automatically assume that the Monte Carlo is going RWD, or will even survive past 2005.

It may in fact become a RWD car or it's name may end up dead. How many of you refered to the upcomming midsize Pontiac or compact Chevrolet replacements as Grand Am and Cavalier just a month or 2 ago?

A RWD Monte Carlo is far from a certainty right now. 6-8 months ago, it was headed to the bone yard in 2005, so don't bet the farm just yet.
guionM is offline  
Old 09-24-2003, 05:08 PM
  #49  
Registered User
 
91_z28_4me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Pewee Valley, KY
Posts: 4,600
Guion I can only think of one thing that might show the similarities between Insigna and the Sigma chassis. If anyone can find out the cowl hieght on the Insigna. That, if I remember correctly, is one of the main reasons why a lowslung coupe couldn't be built on the true Sigma structure. If Insigna has a relatively low cowl height then that means that VE/Sigma light isn't just a rehashed Sigma there are differences. Lets see if we can figure this out.
91_z28_4me is offline  
Old 09-24-2003, 08:06 PM
  #50  
Registered User
 
Z284ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicagoland IL
Posts: 16,179
Originally posted by 91_z28_4me
Guion I can only think of one thing that might show the similarities between Insigna and the Sigma chassis. If anyone can find out the cowl hieght on the Insigna. That, if I remember correctly, is one of the main reasons why a lowslung coupe couldn't be built on the true Sigma structure. If Insigna has a relatively low cowl height then that means that VE/Sigma light isn't just a rehashed Sigma there are differences. Lets see if we can figure this out.
That's something I've been thinking of too.

What would you say if I told you that Insignia was built off of a well worn CTS donor car?


BTW, here are some dimensions.
http://www.conceptcarz.com/folder/ve...vehicleTypeID=

Last edited by Z284ever; 09-24-2003 at 08:26 PM.
Z284ever is offline  
Old 09-24-2003, 09:46 PM
  #51  
Registered User
 
Oz Mickey T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 114
Originally posted by guionM
I would really like to find out details about Insignia's chassis. Insignia is GM's new global RWD car chassis. I think it would put alot of questions to rest (when you get down to it, we're all really guessing to some degree or another).

As for struts, let's not put a blanket condemnation on them. Doesn't a BMW 3 series use them and the 4th gen use a variation of them as well? Both have stellar reputations as top handling cars over vehicles with more sophisicated front suspensions.

Low cost doesn't always mean low performance. If you want a great deal in your next Camaro, then be ready to pay a great deal for your next Camaro.

Senior Holden guy at Frankfurt show: "It (Insignia) is interesting, but it's not relevant to what we're doing."
Oz Mickey T is offline  
Old 09-24-2003, 10:01 PM
  #52  
Registered User
 
crYnOid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 384
Originally posted by Oz Mickey T
Senior Holden guy at Frankfurt show: "It (Insignia) is interesting, but it's not relevant to what we're doing."
chassis or body wise?
crYnOid is offline  
Old 09-24-2003, 10:11 PM
  #53  
Registered User
 
Z284ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicagoland IL
Posts: 16,179
Originally posted by Oz Mickey T
Senior Holden guy at Frankfurt show: "It (Insignia) is interesting, but it's not relevant to what we're doing."
If Sherlock Holmes were reading this, he would conclude:

A) GM is completely full of crap in the description of this "new" architecture and it's depiction of it as a "world RWD platform"

OR.............

B) VE will be mainly for Holden.

BTW, when this senior Holden guy said "we're"....was he refering to Holden specifically or GM?

Last edited by Z284ever; 09-24-2003 at 10:22 PM.
Z284ever is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
01-29-2015 07:10 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
01-11-2015 06:10 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
12-28-2014 06:20 PM
ChrisFrez
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
2
12-07-2014 11:32 AM
bgbchevy
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
12
06-29-2002 09:46 AM



Quick Reply: Motor Trend info on next gen GTO



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:22 AM.