Monte SS/Imapla SS pricing
Monte SS/Imapla SS pricing
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...4_frst2_chevy/
Base: $27,500 ???
Am I wrong for thinking thats a lot of money for "not that much" car? I mean, I guess I can understand you having to add the package price to the base price of the car, but is that an accurate estimate? I could much faster see myself in an Accord V6 or a fully equipped Maxima for that price.
Base: $27,500 ???
Am I wrong for thinking thats a lot of money for "not that much" car? I mean, I guess I can understand you having to add the package price to the base price of the car, but is that an accurate estimate? I could much faster see myself in an Accord V6 or a fully equipped Maxima for that price.
Re: Monte SS/Imapla SS pricing
Originally posted by bigsteve7
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...4_frst2_chevy/
Base: $27,500 ???
Am I wrong for thinking thats a lot of money for "not that much" car? I mean, I guess I can understand you having to add the package price to the base price of the car, but is that an accurate estimate? I could much faster see myself in an Accord V6 or a fully equipped Maxima for that price.
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...4_frst2_chevy/
Base: $27,500 ???
Am I wrong for thinking thats a lot of money for "not that much" car? I mean, I guess I can understand you having to add the package price to the base price of the car, but is that an accurate estimate? I could much faster see myself in an Accord V6 or a fully equipped Maxima for that price.
TCamaroBoy96Z28
Thats GM for ya, over-priced low quality. Thats what they stand for nowadays.
Thats GM for ya, over-priced low quality. Thats what they stand for nowadays.
How is $27,500 for a presumable loaded, now supercharged, Monte Carlo overpriced? That is UNDER the National Average for a new car right now... and that is just STICKER RPICE, not what you'll actually pay.
Last edited by Darth Xed; May 2, 2003 at 03:07 PM.
I think this is the only website in the universe where the average car in the real world costs $30,000, and we bemoan a $27,000, supercharged Impala.
The identical under the skin Buick Regal costs $28,000, and the Pontiac GTP starts at just under $26,000. That puts Impala in the middle, a grand in either direction.
Is it the lowest price for this type of car from GM? No. But it's not the highest either. But it's still right in the neighborhood to where it should be. If you want 20 horsepower and save $1000, simply buy a GTP (assuming you are even interested in buying a FWD sedan)...... so stop yer bellyaching!
The identical under the skin Buick Regal costs $28,000, and the Pontiac GTP starts at just under $26,000. That puts Impala in the middle, a grand in either direction.
Is it the lowest price for this type of car from GM? No. But it's not the highest either. But it's still right in the neighborhood to where it should be. If you want 20 horsepower and save $1000, simply buy a GTP (assuming you are even interested in buying a FWD sedan)...... so stop yer bellyaching!
Last edited by guionM; May 2, 2003 at 02:57 PM.
Seeing thats the same price as a GTP I can't see why anyone would buy an IMPY unless they are thrown by the styling or don;t research much. Also keep in mind that after the $3000 rebate it will only run $24,000 which is VERY competitive with whatelse is on the market.
By the way, where is the data coming from for an average new-car cost of $30K? This is the closest I've found, and it only supports an average cost of MAYBE $22,000, given straight-line extrapolation:
http://www.ott.doe.gov/facts/archives/fotw219.shtml
Are those numbers from the automakers, based on MSRP before rebates? Or are they real numbers paid by real people? Or did people lose their mind in 2002 and drive up the average cost by $8000 over 2001?
http://www.ott.doe.gov/facts/archives/fotw219.shtml
Are those numbers from the automakers, based on MSRP before rebates? Or are they real numbers paid by real people? Or did people lose their mind in 2002 and drive up the average cost by $8000 over 2001?
Re: Monte SS/Imapla SS pricing
Originally posted by bigsteve7
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...4_frst2_chevy/
Base: $27,500 ???
Am I wrong for thinking thats a lot of money for "not that much" car? I mean, I guess I can understand you having to add the package price to the base price of the car, but is that an accurate estimate?
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...4_frst2_chevy/
Base: $27,500 ???
Am I wrong for thinking thats a lot of money for "not that much" car? I mean, I guess I can understand you having to add the package price to the base price of the car, but is that an accurate estimate?
Originally posted by bigsteve7
I could much faster see myself in an Accord V6 or a fully equipped Maxima for that price.
I could much faster see myself in an Accord V6 or a fully equipped Maxima for that price.
Re: Re: Monte SS/Imapla SS pricing
Originally posted by Z28x
LOL good luck getting a fully loaded Maxima for $27,500, they go for about $35,000, talk about not that much car for the money
LOL good luck getting a fully loaded Maxima for $27,500, they go for about $35,000, talk about not that much car for the money

Anyways, I just thought that these cars seemed a little overpriced. I understand that theyre right around the price that they techinically "should" be at, but I really dont see Chevy selling too many of these when you can get many comprable performers for much less. If I was a consumer, and looking for a 4 door sedan, I would look at probably the Mazda 6, Honda Accord, Impala and Maxima. The Impala SS offers comprable performance to these cars and seems to be on the larger end of the price spectrum.
I also understand that there is the GTP and Buick equivalents of these cars, but I always percieved Chevy as the "average man's" car, being affordable and whatnot when compared to GM's other branches. I guess you blame it on inflation, but I guess I just never expected to see this car priced so close to $30k.
_____
*a little off topic*
Id also like to ask how the average price of a car was calculated out to be $30,000. I understand that quoting that average price helps to explain the price placement of cars, but I dont necessarily think it serves as a justification for the price of various car models. There will always be a consumer group (probably mostly young buyers) who will be purchasing cars in the under $20k price range. Car companies seem to be forgetting about this group. One notable exception I can think of is the Mazda 6, a stout performing practical car which comes in right over $20k. What if anything is GM offering, or planning to offer for these buyers?
Overpriced, if you ask me. Those 2 cars are leftovers from the late 90s anyway. In the next 5 years, watch how quickly they are forgotten. Not unlike the 80s Nova. I'm trying as best as I can to be optimistic about something new and fresh from Chevy in the next 2 - 3 years. And I don't mean the Aveo
I think the new Malibu and Maxx might be one to succeed in bringing a forward-looking flair to Chevy to get away from those snoozer-fleet models and point toward something better to follow. I mean jeez,when you're at a new bottom, you gotta think to yourself "I can't continue here dragging at the bottom forever. Even by dumb luck, something has to improve some time". That's how I see Chevy today (and GM's overall car program).
gt
I think the new Malibu and Maxx might be one to succeed in bringing a forward-looking flair to Chevy to get away from those snoozer-fleet models and point toward something better to follow. I mean jeez,when you're at a new bottom, you gotta think to yourself "I can't continue here dragging at the bottom forever. Even by dumb luck, something has to improve some time". That's how I see Chevy today (and GM's overall car program).gt
Last edited by kizz; May 2, 2003 at 09:57 PM.
Originally posted by kizz
Overpriced, if you ask me. Those 2 cars are leftovers from the late 90s anyway. In the next 5 years, watch how quickly they are forgotten. Not unlike the 80s Nova.
gt
Overpriced, if you ask me. Those 2 cars are leftovers from the late 90s anyway. In the next 5 years, watch how quickly they are forgotten. Not unlike the 80s Nova.
gt
Yes, I'd like to see some styling freshening on any car at this point, but at least they are addressing the HP issue.
Originally posted by centric
By the way, where is the data coming from for an average new-car cost of $30K? This is the closest I've found, and it only supports an average cost of MAYBE $22,000, given straight-line extrapolation:
http://www.ott.doe.gov/facts/archives/fotw219.shtml
Are those numbers from the automakers, based on MSRP before rebates? Or are they real numbers paid by real people? Or did people lose their mind in 2002 and drive up the average cost by $8000 over 2001?
By the way, where is the data coming from for an average new-car cost of $30K? This is the closest I've found, and it only supports an average cost of MAYBE $22,000, given straight-line extrapolation:
http://www.ott.doe.gov/facts/archives/fotw219.shtml
Are those numbers from the automakers, based on MSRP before rebates? Or are they real numbers paid by real people? Or did people lose their mind in 2002 and drive up the average cost by $8000 over 2001?
You may be right in that one is based on MSRP and the other is based on actual consumer price after rebates & incentives, since one is from the Commerce Department and my figure is from National Automotive Dealers Association.
Last edited by guionM; May 3, 2003 at 02:18 PM.


