Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Mazda 6 Rust problem?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 10, 2003 | 01:35 PM
  #16  
Doug Harden's Avatar
Prominent Member
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,282
PacerX,

Great answer.....very informative!

Explain also, why I see some panels with a cancer out in the field of the area and not in a typical spot, like a bottom edge, etc... is it due to impurities?

Do the imports use dip galvanizing or some other over-all rust inhibitor?

The pictures of the Mazda and the Evo appear to be cars without any primer or rust inhibitor what so ever..
Old Oct 10, 2003 | 08:50 PM
  #17  
smackkk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 472
From: Texarkana, Tx
Originally posted by PacerX
Up here in the North, we use salt to clear the roads of ice. In Europe they use sand.

Significant issue for a car manufacturer.



Now... let's see here...

What can we get you from GM that's something like or better than a Mazda 6?

Here's what I came up with, I have to ignore destination and sales tax and plate fees (cause you live in Canada - note that all prices are in US dollars):

A full-book 2003 Mazda 6 with the 220hp V6, 5-spd, leather, moonroof, etc... came in at $27,025, the incentives are either $2000 back OR 0% financing...

OK, so let's say your credit is perfect, that means that your payment on the Mazda 6 comes out to $450 per month. Mazda states clearly that they won't give the 0% to everyone.



A full-book 2004 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP with the Competition Group, HUD, leather, premium audio, 260hp V6, TAP shift automatic, moon roof, 1 year of OnStar, yadda yadda yadda... comes in at $32,375, $30,375 after incentives.

BUT, the Pontiac ALSO offers 0% financing ON TOP OF the $30,075 price after the cash back. So, the payment works out to right around $505/month over 60 months.

You can pretty quickly take another $2000 off the Pontiac by not getting leather, or the premium sound system or the moon roof, but that's all a personal decision for you. I don't buy a real car without leather... you may be different. If you were to do that, your payment would drop to $467/month.

At ~$17 more per month, there is no real choice in my mind. The Pontiac just up and blows the Mazda away. Bigger, faster, the bulletproof 3800 V6, safer, vastly more potential for performance, etc...


I just built a V6 Mazda 6 on Edmunds website. Fully loaded with leather, power seats, homelink, bose audio, moonroof, and the 5 speed sport automatic transmission the price was $25,330 before destination. Assume we drop the leather($1500), moonroof(700), bose audio(600) and the homelink(250).thats $3000 off of $25330. So we are at $22330/60 months the payments drop to $372 per month for a comparable Mazda 6 V6. That is a savings of $95 per month. You can save another $900 and get the 5 speed manual(an option not offered by Pontiac). That pushes your savings to over $110/month on the Mazda 6 V6.

Bigger is not always better as some people dont want a car the size of the Grand Prix, which also adds to weight. The GTP weighs close to 400lbs more than the 6 which comes close to voiding the hp advantage of the Grand Prix.

The 6 has side impact airbags which the GP does not. The 6 also a 4 yr/50,000 mile warranty vs a 3/36k for the GP. One more thing, the 6 also has automatic climate control which again, the GP does not. So, when comparing similiar vehicles, I can see why someone would choose the Mazda 6 for app. $100 less per month. Oh, two more things..the 5 speed auto in the 6 is a manually shiftable auto plus the 6 has rear seat heater ducts.

Also, Pontiac does not hand out 0% to everybody that walks in. You have to have pretty good credit to get 0% through anybody.
Old Oct 10, 2003 | 09:29 PM
  #18  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Originally posted by smackkk

The 6 has side impact airbags which the GP does not.
This is not true.

Click here:

http://www.pontiac.com/grandprix/ind...?source=hmlnav

and click on the "Designed to be the safest Grand Prix Ever button."
Old Oct 10, 2003 | 10:23 PM
  #19  
smackkk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 472
From: Texarkana, Tx
ok, oops, I was going by what the Edmunds site had using the compare features feature
Old Oct 10, 2003 | 11:10 PM
  #20  
PacerX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,979
Originally posted by smackkk
I just built a V6 Mazda 6 on Edmunds website. Fully loaded with leather, power seats, homelink, bose audio, moonroof, and the 5 speed sport automatic transmission the price was $25,330 before destination. Assume we drop the leather($1500), moonroof(700), bose audio(600) and the homelink(250).thats $3000 off of $25330. So we are at $22330/60 months the payments drop to $372 per month for a comparable Mazda 6 V6. That is a savings of $95 per month. You can save another $900 and get the 5 speed manual(an option not offered by Pontiac). That pushes your savings to over $110/month on the Mazda 6 V6.

Bigger is not always better as some people dont want a car the size of the Grand Prix, which also adds to weight. The GTP weighs close to 400lbs more than the 6 which comes close to voiding the hp advantage of the Grand Prix.

The 6 has side impact airbags which the GP does not. The 6 also a 4 yr/50,000 mile warranty vs a 3/36k for the GP. One more thing, the 6 also has automatic climate control which again, the GP does not. So, when comparing similiar vehicles, I can see why someone would choose the Mazda 6 for app. $100 less per month. Oh, two more things..the 5 speed auto in the 6 is a manually shiftable auto plus the 6 has rear seat heater ducts.

Also, Pontiac does not hand out 0% to everybody that walks in. You have to have pretty good credit to get 0% through anybody.
Pffft...

I went MSRP for a reason. Edmunds can claim whatever they want to claim, but the fact of the matter is that you have to go in and make the deal.

Secondly, Mazda 6 vs. Grand Prix GTP in an acceleration contest? My money is on the GTP. Give me 30 minutes and $80 and I'll make it really ugly.

Bigger, faster, safer.... and it doesn't seem to rust...
Old Oct 10, 2003 | 11:10 PM
  #21  
RiceEating5.0's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,313
Personally, the only v6 coupe i'd bother spending near 30g's on would be the Infiniti G35.

Both the GTP and mazda6 seem to be good values too.
Old Oct 10, 2003 | 11:14 PM
  #22  
PacerX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,979
Originally posted by Doug Harden
PacerX,

Great answer.....very informative!

Explain also, why I see some panels with a cancer out in the field of the area and not in a typical spot, like a bottom edge, etc... is it due to impurities?
Most likely one of the following:

1) Damaged paint.

2) Poor adhesion of the electrogalvanization/e-coat.

3) A corrosion problem that existed before the panel was plated and painted.


Originally posted by Doug Harden
Do the imports use dip galvanizing or some other over-all rust inhibitor?
I thought so. But they generally use poorer grade steels and tools. The tools are a significant part of the issue.


[/B][/QUOTE] The pictures of the Mazda and the Evo appear to be cars without any primer or rust inhibitor what so ever.. [/B][/QUOTE]

Oh my...
Old Oct 10, 2003 | 11:27 PM
  #23  
smackkk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 472
From: Texarkana, Tx
Those were msrp prices, I didnt list what Edmunds suggests you pay.......i can screen capture if you wish

Also, I know a GP can be made to be alot faster...but ya know what...my wife and many other wives could care less...lol

I'm not knocking the GP, I like it. I just think the 6 has alot going for it.
Old Oct 10, 2003 | 11:33 PM
  #24  
smackkk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 472
From: Texarkana, Tx
How can you tell if the car has a rust inhibitor applied? Ya know, besides the rust...lol
Old Oct 11, 2003 | 03:47 PM
  #25  
SFireGT98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,232
From: Orlando, FL USA
Theres that awesome foreign car quality that everyone must be talking about
Old Oct 21, 2003 | 09:22 PM
  #26  
Mazda6i's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3
Dang, I can't believe this issue is on a Camaro forum. I found this site linked from a Mazda site. I have a Mazda6i and I have light rust on my doors. It sucks.

Anyway, I had to comment on all of the remarks about "foreign" cars.

As some of you probably already know, the Mazda6 is built in Flat Rock Michigan at Auto Alliance International, a factory co-owned with Ford. I doubt Mazda ships steel to the Flat Rock plant from Japan, so "cheap Japanese steel" is not the issue.

Speaking of "foreign" cars, do any of you remember the Chevy ads for the Camaro that said something like "From the country that brought you Rock & Roll.......the Chevrolet Camaro...."

Weird, I didn't know Canada brought us Rock & Roll. They brought us Bryan Adams and the Camaro, but Rock & Roll?

Keep up the cool forum.....I'm a Mustang guy, but I like Camaros too, I hope GM finds a way to bring it back.
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 09:17 AM
  #27  
stars1010's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,121
From: Houston
Originally posted by Mazda6i
Dang, I can't believe this issue is on a Camaro forum. I found this site linked from a Mazda site. I have a Mazda6i and I have light rust on my doors. It sucks.

Anyway, I had to comment on all of the remarks about "foreign" cars.

As some of you probably already know, the Mazda6 is built in Flat Rock Michigan at Auto Alliance International, a factory co-owned with Ford. I doubt Mazda ships steel to the Flat Rock plant from Japan, so "cheap Japanese steel" is not the issue.

Speaking of "foreign" cars, do any of you remember the Chevy ads for the Camaro that said something like "From the country that brought you Rock & Roll.......the Chevrolet Camaro...."

Weird, I didn't know Canada brought us Rock & Roll. They brought us Bryan Adams and the Camaro, but Rock & Roll?

Keep up the cool forum.....I'm a Mustang guy, but I like Camaros too, I hope GM finds a way to bring it back.
You doubt Mazda ships steel in? Really, because Bob Lutz says differently. Well your wrong, and I don’t know what the 4th Gen being built at St. Therese had anything to do with foreign poor build quality.

Read this from a recent interview with Mr. Lutz.


Why do you think the Japanese continue to gain market share in the U.S.? Is it simply product-related or does it go beyond that?
Part of it is, of course, exchange rates. Adjusted for costs in the respective countries, the yen is just too weak. And considering the cost of doing business in the United States in U.S. dollars, the Japanese still have a cost advantage of three to four thousand dollars per vehicle, which they can either use to pricing advantage or margin advantage or putting more equipment into a car at a given price. And it doesn't matter whether they produce the cars in the U.S. or not, because a lot of the content is still imported. People say, "Well, Toyotas are built in the United States now." Yes, many are assembled in the United States, many are not assembled in the United States,and even the ones that are assembled in the U.S. contain a high percentage of Japanese or other offshore parts. The exchange rate issue is real. The other thing is, I don't think there is a real, measurable quality difference anymore. If you look at J.D. Power ranking by make — by nameplate — as opposed to by corporation, Toyota is actually now in ninth place. And Buick, Chevrolet and Cadillac are ahead of Toyota. It's only when you lump Lexus and Toyota together that Toyota barely squeaks out a first-place position — a little known fact, by the way. So the reality is we've closed the quality gap but the lag in customer perception is still huge. The average person still believes that the Japanese cars' quality and reliability is head-and-shoulders above General Motors, and it simply is no longer the case.

Last edited by stars1010; Oct 22, 2003 at 09:22 AM.
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 09:46 AM
  #28  
1990 Turbo Grand Prix's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 764
From: Crystal Falls, MI USA
Re: Mazda 6 Rust problem?

Originally posted by Joe K. 96 Zeee!!
Check out this link....may hear more about this in the future...

http://www.4doorzoom.1hwy.com/m6_rust.html

And pictures...

http://www.4doorzoom.1hwy.com/m6_rust_gallery.html
Can't expect them to last forever!
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 10:36 AM
  #29  
Mazda6i's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3
Originally posted by stars1010
You doubt Mazda ships steel in? Really, because Bob Lutz says differently. Well your wrong, and I don’t know what the 4th Gen being built at St. Therese had anything to do with foreign poor build quality.

Read this from a recent interview with Mr. Lutz.


Why do you think the Japanese continue to gain market share in the U.S.? Is it simply product-related or does it go beyond that?
Part of it is, of course, exchange rates. Adjusted for costs in the respective countries, the yen is just too weak. And considering the cost of doing business in the United States in U.S. dollars, the Japanese still have a cost advantage of three to four thousand dollars per vehicle, which they can either use to pricing advantage or margin advantage or putting more equipment into a car at a given price. And it doesn't matter whether they produce the cars in the U.S. or not, because a lot of the content is still imported. People say, "Well, Toyotas are built in the United States now." Yes, many are assembled in the United States, many are not assembled in the United States,and even the ones that are assembled in the U.S. contain a high percentage of Japanese or other offshore parts. The exchange rate issue is real. The other thing is, I don't think there is a real, measurable quality difference anymore. If you look at J.D. Power ranking by make — by nameplate — as opposed to by corporation, Toyota is actually now in ninth place. And Buick, Chevrolet and Cadillac are ahead of Toyota. It's only when you lump Lexus and Toyota together that Toyota barely squeaks out a first-place position — a little known fact, by the way. So the reality is we've closed the quality gap but the lag in customer perception is still huge. The average person still believes that the Japanese cars' quality and reliability is head-and-shoulders above General Motors, and it simply is no longer the case.
Actually, according to my window sticker, my car has 50% US/Canadian content and about 25% Japanese content. The rest came from Mexico. The transmission came from Japan and I'm assuming that it counts for much of the 25% Japanese content. If all of the sheetmetal was shipped from Japan, the Japanese content listed on the window sticker would be much more than 25%. Considering NAFTA and the fact that domestic companies are moving a lot of production to Mexico, the whole "domestic" and "foreign" thing is kinda blurred. Buying "domestic" just because it's "domestic" doesn't make a whole lot of sense anymore. Considering how domestic companies are moving a lot of production out of the United States, it seems a little foolish to buy a domestic because it's the patriotic, flag waving thing to do. Moving production to Mexico or Canada certainly isn't very patriotic if you ask me, and besides, my Mazda6 was made in a Union factory by a company that is controlled by Ford. The American workers who made my car are contributing to the local and federal tax base......Canadian and Mexican workers do not.

Last edited by Mazda6i; Oct 22, 2003 at 11:50 AM.
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 10:46 AM
  #30  
Mazda6i's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3
and just to shoot another hole in the "cheap Japanese steel" theory, the Japanese-made Mazda6 that is shipped everywhere but North America does not have this rust problem.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:39 PM.