Malibu outscores Camry in J.D.Powers
Malibu outscores Camry in J.D.Powers
Reported by a recent issue of a Union Mag, "Solidarity":
"According to consumer surveys by J.D. Power & Associates, the Malibu outranks the Camry on; mechanical quality, feature and accessory quality, and OVERALL Quality. The Camry does outpoint the Malibu on body and interior quality.
The car buyers surveyed by J.D.Power also say the Malibu is better on every quality measure than other comparable non-Union sedans, INCLUDING the Honda Accord and the Nissan Altima.(Rankings posted at www.jdpower.com )
Surprised ? We've been hearing for so long that Japanese and European branded cars are better than ours that just about everyone believes it - even if it ISN'T true.
False Statements:
#1)"I get better Quality out of a Japanese car." = False..."Not any more. Yes, there once was a "quality gap" between foreign branded vehicles and Big Three UAW made cars and trucks.
But why make today's purchasing decisions based on yesterday's news? FACT is the quality of all vehicles has risen dramatically in recent years. Cars and trucks made by UAW members HAVE caught up to the competition, and in some cases surpassed them.
J.D.Power, for example, awarded FIVE, UAW made vehicles its coveted "Best In Class"ranking in 2003, for the fewest defects reported per vehicle.
And industry expert James Harbour, founder of the "Harbour Report", wrote in the Detroit News last December that when the Big Three vehicles were compared to the other brands, "significant gaps in quality and productivity DO NOT EXIST". ( http://www.detnews.com/2003/editoria...13-340272.htm. )
#2) "I can get a better deal on a foreign car."= False...Kelly Blue Book at www.kbb.com , surveys vehicle transactions all over the country to determine current prices. Kelly priced a new 2004 Malibu, equipped with a 3.5L V6 at $20,323.oo.
That's almost $1,800 less than a similar 2004 Toyota Camry, selling for $22, 116.oo. The Malibu is about $2,400 than a similar Nissan Altima, and about $1,400 less than a similar Honda Accord.
#3) "My foreign brand gets better gas milage than your Big Three Gas Guzzler." = False...Actually according to the EPA reports that the UAW made vehicles get the best milage in Six out of Thirteen vehicle catagories. ( www.fueleconomy.gov )
According to the EPA, more tha "63" foreign branded vehicles soak up enough fuel to get tagged with a Federal Gas Guzzler Tax. But there are just "Four" UAW made vehicles in the Gas Guzzler category".........Outside the Media glare, the Big Three are getting ready to to provide Hybrid Engines as an option on high volume SUV's and Pick Up trucs. They're also equipping popular cars like the Pontiac Vibe and the Ford 500 and the Mercury Montego with advanced engines and transmissions that sharply improve fuel economy. Furthermore, the UAW has been a strong advocate for the Big Three to get their Hybrid vehicles to the showroom more quickly. Infact almost every category of vehicle- "Compact", "Mid-Sized" or "Luxury" car; minivan or cargo van, SUV's or Pick Ups- you can buy a UAW made vehicle with a milage rating nearly as good or better than the competition.
The V6 3.5L for example at 23mpg city and 32mpg Highway, gets better milage than a similar Toyota, Honda Accord, and Nisan Altima....According to the EPA, the average driver will save between $68 and $106 on anual fuel costs by driving a Malibu instead of the competition..Toyota Camry, Honda Accord and Nissan Altima..
(there's more but I'm tired...later..)
"According to consumer surveys by J.D. Power & Associates, the Malibu outranks the Camry on; mechanical quality, feature and accessory quality, and OVERALL Quality. The Camry does outpoint the Malibu on body and interior quality.
The car buyers surveyed by J.D.Power also say the Malibu is better on every quality measure than other comparable non-Union sedans, INCLUDING the Honda Accord and the Nissan Altima.(Rankings posted at www.jdpower.com )
Surprised ? We've been hearing for so long that Japanese and European branded cars are better than ours that just about everyone believes it - even if it ISN'T true.
False Statements:
#1)"I get better Quality out of a Japanese car." = False..."Not any more. Yes, there once was a "quality gap" between foreign branded vehicles and Big Three UAW made cars and trucks.
But why make today's purchasing decisions based on yesterday's news? FACT is the quality of all vehicles has risen dramatically in recent years. Cars and trucks made by UAW members HAVE caught up to the competition, and in some cases surpassed them.
J.D.Power, for example, awarded FIVE, UAW made vehicles its coveted "Best In Class"ranking in 2003, for the fewest defects reported per vehicle.
And industry expert James Harbour, founder of the "Harbour Report", wrote in the Detroit News last December that when the Big Three vehicles were compared to the other brands, "significant gaps in quality and productivity DO NOT EXIST". ( http://www.detnews.com/2003/editoria...13-340272.htm. )
#2) "I can get a better deal on a foreign car."= False...Kelly Blue Book at www.kbb.com , surveys vehicle transactions all over the country to determine current prices. Kelly priced a new 2004 Malibu, equipped with a 3.5L V6 at $20,323.oo.
That's almost $1,800 less than a similar 2004 Toyota Camry, selling for $22, 116.oo. The Malibu is about $2,400 than a similar Nissan Altima, and about $1,400 less than a similar Honda Accord.
#3) "My foreign brand gets better gas milage than your Big Three Gas Guzzler." = False...Actually according to the EPA reports that the UAW made vehicles get the best milage in Six out of Thirteen vehicle catagories. ( www.fueleconomy.gov )
According to the EPA, more tha "63" foreign branded vehicles soak up enough fuel to get tagged with a Federal Gas Guzzler Tax. But there are just "Four" UAW made vehicles in the Gas Guzzler category".........Outside the Media glare, the Big Three are getting ready to to provide Hybrid Engines as an option on high volume SUV's and Pick Up trucs. They're also equipping popular cars like the Pontiac Vibe and the Ford 500 and the Mercury Montego with advanced engines and transmissions that sharply improve fuel economy. Furthermore, the UAW has been a strong advocate for the Big Three to get their Hybrid vehicles to the showroom more quickly. Infact almost every category of vehicle- "Compact", "Mid-Sized" or "Luxury" car; minivan or cargo van, SUV's or Pick Ups- you can buy a UAW made vehicle with a milage rating nearly as good or better than the competition.
The V6 3.5L for example at 23mpg city and 32mpg Highway, gets better milage than a similar Toyota, Honda Accord, and Nisan Altima....According to the EPA, the average driver will save between $68 and $106 on anual fuel costs by driving a Malibu instead of the competition..Toyota Camry, Honda Accord and Nissan Altima..
(there's more but I'm tired...later..)
Last edited by 90rocz; Feb 24, 2004 at 12:11 AM.
Re: Malibu outscores Camry in J.D.Powers
Good for GM! I recently checked out a new Malibu and was very impressed - it looked solid. Yea, the styling is still terrible, but it's not exactly like other players in that segment have anything to brag about.
Man, you gotta love the way the numbers are twisted up in that claim
Originally posted by 90rocz
Reported by a recent issue of a Union Mag, "Solidarity":
#3) "My foreign brand gets better gas milage than your Big Three Gas Guzzler." = False...Actually according to the EPA reports that the UAW made vehicles get the best milage in Six out of Thirteen vehicle catagories. ( www.fueleconomy.gov )
According to the EPA, more tha "63" foreign branded vehicles soak up enough fuel to get tagged with a Federal Gas Guzzler Tax. But there are just "Four" UAW made vehicles in the Gas Guzzler category
Reported by a recent issue of a Union Mag, "Solidarity":
#3) "My foreign brand gets better gas milage than your Big Three Gas Guzzler." = False...Actually according to the EPA reports that the UAW made vehicles get the best milage in Six out of Thirteen vehicle catagories. ( www.fueleconomy.gov )
According to the EPA, more tha "63" foreign branded vehicles soak up enough fuel to get tagged with a Federal Gas Guzzler Tax. But there are just "Four" UAW made vehicles in the Gas Guzzler category
That's good to hear. Now we just need these types of articles to keep comming and drive theses stereotypes out of the non-believers. I'm thinking the comparison to the Camry might show up in some advertising.
On a side note, I am seeing a bunch more Malibu's on the street and the more I see them, the more I like them. It is still on the dull side but not on the hideous dull side like the Camry.
On a side note, I am seeing a bunch more Malibu's on the street and the more I see them, the more I like them. It is still on the dull side but not on the hideous dull side like the Camry.
I just saw a new Maxima on the street yesterday, man that car went to crap. First it got much smaller, at least in appearance. And thos butt-ugly tail lights gotta go!...Looks like the Altima is taking TOP spot for them...
Another tid-bit: Question:
"Ok, you've convinced me. I'm ready to buy a UAW-made vehicle. BUT I'm confused. Some foreign brands are non-Union, but I've heard that UAW members also assemble some Toyota, Mazda and Mitsubishi models. How do I know which is which?
Answer:
Yes, UAW members DO assemble some of those vehicles. To find out which ones, visit www.uaw.org and select "UAW-Made" from the left pull down menu for a list of 2004 UAW-made cars, trucks and vans.
Another tid-bit: Question:
"Ok, you've convinced me. I'm ready to buy a UAW-made vehicle. BUT I'm confused. Some foreign brands are non-Union, but I've heard that UAW members also assemble some Toyota, Mazda and Mitsubishi models. How do I know which is which?
Answer:
Yes, UAW members DO assemble some of those vehicles. To find out which ones, visit www.uaw.org and select "UAW-Made" from the left pull down menu for a list of 2004 UAW-made cars, trucks and vans.
When I can buy a Malibu that requires exactly $100 in corrective repairs over a 10 year period, then I'll go back.
Until such time, I'll stick with my Accord, which has shown me exactly that.
And, don't think for a second that I'm too interested in supporting the UAW.
Until such time, I'll stick with my Accord, which has shown me exactly that.
And, don't think for a second that I'm too interested in supporting the UAW.
Originally posted by Todd80Z28
When I can buy a Malibu that requires exactly $100 in corrective repairs over a 10 year period, then I'll go back.
Until such time, I'll stick with my Accord, which has shown me exactly that.
And, don't think for a second that I'm too interested in supporting the UAW.
When I can buy a Malibu that requires exactly $100 in corrective repairs over a 10 year period, then I'll go back.
Until such time, I'll stick with my Accord, which has shown me exactly that.
And, don't think for a second that I'm too interested in supporting the UAW.
I don't know you from Adam, and I am not trying to be smart here or anything, but just look at your reply.
You have no intention, no matter how good the Malibu may be, nor how bad the Accord could be in the future, to change back... how can you ever know if you'll pay exactly $100 in repairs over 10 years without buying one to begin with?
Again, I am not trying to be jerky, but you will never switch, and , to be quite honest, if you have only paid $100 in repairs in 10 years on your Accord, why should you?
When I can buy a Malibu that requires exactly $100 in corrective repairs over a 10 year period, then I'll go back.
Lifes about change, and nothing ever stays the same...to stay brand loyal b/c of a 20yr old stereotype, not weighing up-to-date information, just isn't using sound judgement..
And, don't think for a second that I'm too interested in supporting the UAW.
Unions are just Power to negociate with an employer for such things that w/o them you would never have a voice in...
Let me give you a little idea:
"Bush chooses to push for an even Freer Trade agreement that he knows will finish labor and manufacturing off in this country. WHY? Because unions are the Base of Power for organized Labor. Destroy the Unions and you effectively destroy the voice of the people. Workers in LOW-WAGE jobs frequently are labeled as "Lacking Skills" and in need of training to move into better-paying positions. But while education is a traditional route to higher pay, Shulman contends, "No job is inherently Low-Wage". "Take Autoworkers, who had "horrible" jobs that became good ones because of unions and their social legislation..."
Untied we bargain, Divided we beg...
It wasn't that long ago to the "Sweat-Shop" days of factories and Mills, and it seems to be heading back that direction, slowed ONLY by the Unions...
You have no intention, no matter how good the Malibu may be, nor how bad the Accord could be in the future, to change back... how can you ever know if you'll pay exactly $100 in repairs over 10 years without buying one to begin with?
Again, I am not trying to be jerky, but you will never switch, and , to be quite honest, if you have only paid $100 in repairs in 10 years on your Accord, why should you?
Again, I am not trying to be jerky, but you will never switch, and , to be quite honest, if you have only paid $100 in repairs in 10 years on your Accord, why should you?
to stay brand loyal b/c of a 20yr old stereotype, not weighing up-to-date information, just isn't using sound judgement..
Never mind that the Malibu styling and fit/finish just doesn't grab me, at all. I should know- I get one from Avis just about every time I travel on business.
I'm not anti-Big 3, but they don't build much of what I'm looking for these days (at least that I could afford- I'd take a CTS-V
). That's just how it is. I don't have to deal with that- they do.
It wasn't that long ago to the "Sweat-Shop" days of factories and Mills, and it seems to be heading back that direction, slowed ONLY by the Unions...
Todd
Way to go Malibu
On the topic of unions...
I have a bad taste in my mouth from working alongside some in the past. IMO, it used to be a good thing and now is not so much. Members (not all) would abuse their "rights" that were given to them by the union and I could routinely find them sleeping on the job or worse.
On the topic of unions...
I have a bad taste in my mouth from working alongside some in the past. IMO, it used to be a good thing and now is not so much. Members (not all) would abuse their "rights" that were given to them by the union and I could routinely find them sleeping on the job or worse.
I honestly hope this is true. And if this was announced regarding the newly redesigned model, I would be very likely to believe it, as many magazines have noticed the Malibu has really shaped up over its recent ground-up redesign.
However, considering that JDPower is referring to the previous style Malibu in their survey, instead of gaining faith in Chevrolet, I've lost faith in JD Power.
Go to www.carreview.com or www.eopinions.com or just about any other site that allows real owners to come in and write their own reviews and post them directly to a database. The Malibu, last time I checked, was ranked in dead last place out of over two hundred and fifty compact and mid-sized vehicles listed based on owner ratings.
It's true that many people only go to that site to complain about their car, but you've also got to realize that this is a constant for any model of car... not just the Malibu.
It seems that very sporadic eletrical gremlins as well as serious drivetrain issues plague the Malibu. That's not even getting into the very poorly assembled interior, but I've never really dogged on the Malibu for that since it's not a very expensive car and in that price class I'd honestly be willing to sacrafise a bit of interior fit and material quality for a more reliable drivetrain and accessory system.
Anyhow... I'm not saying the Camry is perfect, and I'm not saying the Malibu is absolute crap. But I am finding it strange that with all of the independent databases on the web, Malibu owners seem to be, on average, very unhappy with the reliability of their car, yet JD Power says that these same consumers are actually more satisfied with the reliability of their Malibu than Accord and Camry owners aree.
However, considering that JDPower is referring to the previous style Malibu in their survey, instead of gaining faith in Chevrolet, I've lost faith in JD Power.
Go to www.carreview.com or www.eopinions.com or just about any other site that allows real owners to come in and write their own reviews and post them directly to a database. The Malibu, last time I checked, was ranked in dead last place out of over two hundred and fifty compact and mid-sized vehicles listed based on owner ratings.
It's true that many people only go to that site to complain about their car, but you've also got to realize that this is a constant for any model of car... not just the Malibu.
It seems that very sporadic eletrical gremlins as well as serious drivetrain issues plague the Malibu. That's not even getting into the very poorly assembled interior, but I've never really dogged on the Malibu for that since it's not a very expensive car and in that price class I'd honestly be willing to sacrafise a bit of interior fit and material quality for a more reliable drivetrain and accessory system.
Anyhow... I'm not saying the Camry is perfect, and I'm not saying the Malibu is absolute crap. But I am finding it strange that with all of the independent databases on the web, Malibu owners seem to be, on average, very unhappy with the reliability of their car, yet JD Power says that these same consumers are actually more satisfied with the reliability of their Malibu than Accord and Camry owners aree.
Originally posted by Todd80Z28
Never mind that the Malibu styling and fit/finish just doesn't grab me, at all. I should know- I get one from Avis just about every time I travel on business.
Todd
Never mind that the Malibu styling and fit/finish just doesn't grab me, at all. I should know- I get one from Avis just about every time I travel on business.
Todd
I happen to think that the previous one was a decent car, but the new one is simply better.
Originally posted by Todd80Z28
And they served their purpose well. That was then, this is now, and it's a different world. Freedom is permeating its way into every single aspect of our lives, much to the chagrin of those in power, and in the end, there won't be anything that they can do about it. The unions can adjust to the times, or they can continue to shrink.
Todd
And they served their purpose well. That was then, this is now, and it's a different world. Freedom is permeating its way into every single aspect of our lives, much to the chagrin of those in power, and in the end, there won't be anything that they can do about it. The unions can adjust to the times, or they can continue to shrink.
Todd
Corporations always have been, and always will be, about the dollar. As long as success for them is measured in profit margins, they will be trying to shrink their workforces, either through headcount-cutting, or wage cuts. Unions will always exist in that environment. If a company can get by paying their employees the same as a union shop across the street, more power to them. But if there were no unions, can you really look me in the eye and tell me my job wouldnt be given to an illegal alien earning a quarter of what I do?
-FM, member, Local 769, International Brotherhood of Teamsters.
tell me my job wouldnt be given to an illegal alien earning a quarter of what I do?
If so, let the free market reign. If not, then what are you worried about?
Thats why I have to submit greivances on a weekly basis just to get paid for the hours I worked. Thats why managment routinely trys to get the lowest-wage earners to stay for overtime.
Todd


