Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Magazine scribes roll Toyota Kluger (Highlander)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 25, 2008 | 07:46 PM
  #31  
DvBoard's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 940
From: Southern Indiana
Originally Posted by Robert_Nashville
I am not an engineer nor did I say at a Holiday Inn Express last night but I’ve been around long enough to know that if you want to do real testing of a type of system between different brands/models of vehicles, the only want to REALLY know how well the system is doing is to remove all other variables – that means controlled circumstances.

Same driver or not…professional driver of not, there are probably dozens if not hundreds of factors that could come into play in testing like this and just because the guy manages to roll the Toyota cannot be taken as hard evidence that their system was at fault.

It may be, I may not be but you’ll never know from testing like this.

Not that I expect you to believe me; we are, after all, talking about an evil Toyota – it must be the vehicle’s fault!
You missed my point that the system failed to respond in a situation that it should have. It has nothing to do with variables etc. that are beyond control of the driver.

If the system had performed as promised, there would have not been a roll over. But then again i don't expect you to understand, your not of an engineering mindset.
Old Jan 25, 2008 | 09:27 PM
  #32  
Robert_Nashville's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,938
Originally Posted by DvBoard
You missed my point that the system failed to respond in a situation that it should have. It has nothing to do with variables etc. that are beyond control of the driver.

If the system had performed as promised, there would have not been a roll over. But then again i don't expect you to understand, your not of an engineering mindset.
What difference would my being an engineer make to you...you are already disagreeing with those who are engineers.

You don't have to be an engineer to understand the difference between scientific and objective testing mthods where variables are held to a minimum (or eliminated) vs. unscientific and non-objective methods with no control over variables that can have a direct affect on testing results.
Old Jan 25, 2008 | 11:08 PM
  #33  
mastrdrver's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,817
From: O-Town
Originally Posted by Robert_Nashville
What difference would my being an engineer make to you...you are already disagreeing with those who are engineers.

You don't have to be an engineer to understand the difference between scientific and objective testing mthods where variables are held to a minimum (or eliminated) vs. unscientific and non-objective methods with no control over variables that can have a direct affect on testing results.
but Robert, shouldn't the system have prevented him from even entering that situation? That is the problem I have with what happened that the system allowed the driver to get into a situation that which there was only one out come.

BTW, I fail to believe that he was going 180kph. He would have rolled several times if that would have happened.
Old Jan 25, 2008 | 11:44 PM
  #34  
SSbaby's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,123
From: Melbourne, Australia
Originally Posted by mastrdrver
BTW, I fail to believe that he was going 180kph. He would have rolled several times if that would have happened.
I tend to agree. Why would this journo 'waste' his time in the Kluger when he is supposedly conducting a legitimate test for COTY? Wheels would have had zillions of cars to get through... and most were far more exciting to drive. There were also numerous other 'guest' drivers invited to partake as judges for COTY... so it's a bit hard to pull the wool over the insurance company's eyes, methinks.

Btw, the Merc C-class won 2008 COTY, outpacing the Mondeo and Mazda2. A bit exorbitant for most so make of the prize what you will!
Old Jan 26, 2008 | 12:01 AM
  #35  
94Camaro_Z_28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 888
From: La Porte City, Iowa
He should've never been able to get it into that slide to begin with. No one is arguing that only the Toyota would roll hitting that ditch at 60mph sideways.....the arguement is that the ESP shouldn't have let it get that far away to begin with.

No way in hell that was 180kph.
Old Jan 26, 2008 | 07:28 AM
  #36  
Eric Bryant's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,400
From: Michigan's left coast
Originally Posted by mastrdrver
but Robert, shouldn't the system have prevented him from even entering that situation? That is the problem I have with what happened that the system allowed the driver to get into a situation that which there was only one out come.
It's not impossible to "get ahead" of stability control systems through deliberate control inputs (such as the Scandinavian Flick).

BTW, I fail to believe that he was going 180kph. He would have rolled several times if that would have happened.
I was the passenger in a car that left the road doing 105MPH, and I tend to agree that the pictures don't look like an accident at a similar speed. Regardless, cornering at 60MPH on a gravel road might be reckless in its own way.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RUENUF
Cars For Sale
6
Mar 13, 2016 03:37 PM
Quickss96
Cars For Sale
6
Jan 29, 2016 05:56 PM
93 RedBird
Fuel and Ignition
4
Nov 15, 2015 08:24 AM
Rittmeister
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
4
Aug 7, 2015 01:13 AM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Aug 5, 2015 08:35 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:34 PM.