Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Lutz mentions 6th gen Camaro!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-14-2009, 09:38 AM
  #31  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Z284ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicagoland IL
Posts: 16,179
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
How about a turbo V6?

Even that would make me sad. A Camaro without an available V8 (even if it's an exclusive, low-volume model) just doesn't make sense to me.

Well.....make your requests gents. Bob Lutz has opened the door for you.


Personally, I'd be happy with a 4, a turbo 4, and a V8 line up.

200 hp, 300 hp, 400 hp.

Last edited by Z284ever; 01-14-2009 at 09:40 AM.
Z284ever is offline  
Old 01-14-2009, 09:43 AM
  #32  
Registered User
 
ZZtop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,217
Originally Posted by Z284ever
Well.....make your requests gents. Bob Lutz has opened the door for you.


Personally, I'd be happy with a 4, a turbo 4, and a V8 line up.

200 hp, 300 hp, 400 hp.
And by the time the 6th Gen comes out, hopefully it will look like this: 37mpg, 32mpg, 27mpg
ZZtop is offline  
Old 01-14-2009, 11:02 AM
  #33  
Super Moderator
 
JakeRobb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Okemos, MI
Posts: 9,488
Originally Posted by Z284ever
Well.....make your requests gents. Bob Lutz has opened the door for you.


Personally, I'd be happy with a 4, a turbo 4, and a V8 line up.

200 hp, 300 hp, 400 hp.
I'd like to see something along the lines of the LNF, a turbo version of the DI 3.6, and a turbo/supercharged DI V8 (LSA?).
call it 260 (base), 400 (SS), and 550hp (Z28).

An all-forced-induction lineup would be sweet, and would contribute positively to the fuel economy ratings.
JakeRobb is offline  
Old 01-14-2009, 12:01 PM
  #34  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Z284ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicagoland IL
Posts: 16,179
Originally Posted by ZZtop
And by the time the 6th Gen comes out, hopefully it will look like this: 37mpg, 32mpg, 27mpg

I think those are very achievable ratings and would go a long way towards securing the brand's future.

Last edited by Z284ever; 01-14-2009 at 12:08 PM.
Z284ever is offline  
Old 01-14-2009, 02:57 PM
  #35  
Registered User
 
muckz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Toronto, ON Canada
Posts: 2,402
Originally Posted by teal98
If the car is light enough, the 182hp DI 2.4 could do a pretty good job with a 1/4 mile in the 15s. For a lot of folks, that'd be plenty fast. Add a turbo, and you'd have enough for almost everyone else. Engine technology may improve a bit by the time this came along (which is totally speculative right now).
It would need to weigh 2900-3000 lbs to run 1/4 mi in the 15s. With RWD and IRS? Don't think so.
muckz is offline  
Old 01-14-2009, 04:06 PM
  #36  
Registered User
 
teal98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 3,132
Originally Posted by muckz
It would need to weigh 2900-3000 lbs to run 1/4 mi in the 15s. With RWD and IRS? Don't think so.
With a manual? I was thinking more like 3200.

Anyway, you're probably right and it would likely be low 16s without more HP. That's still fast enough for a base model in a 40mpg CAFE world.
teal98 is offline  
Old 01-14-2009, 05:04 PM
  #37  
Registered User
 
SSbaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,123
Originally Posted by Z284ever
You do agree that the G8 is a completely different kind of car than what a Camaro should be....don't you?
All I will agree on is that the 5th Gen is a Camaro in every way. It's designed right (aggressive while beautiful). Has the right powertrains (V8 is still king otherwise what's the point of Camaro?). It's going to be priced right. It's the perfect modern day muscle car that will do its heritage proud.

Those who are on the 4 cyl turbo bandwagon are just destroying it's link to past Camaros... effectively sealing its fate. A Camaro is not a small car in the tradition of a BMW 3-series. European cars are too small for American (and Aussie) muscle car enthusiasts.
SSbaby is offline  
Old 01-14-2009, 06:20 PM
  #38  
Registered User
 
jg95z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oakland, California
Posts: 9,710
Originally Posted by SSbaby
Those who are on the 4 cyl turbo bandwagon are just destroying it's link to past Camaros... effectively sealing its fate. A Camaro is not a small car in the tradition of a BMW 3-series. European cars are too small for American (and Aussie) muscle car enthusiasts.
The people that suggest the Camaro should be a BMW 3-series sized coupe forget that the 3-series itself is an overweight bloated caricature of its former self. The 3-series evolved from/replaced the 2002, which by today's standards would be more comparable to a Chevy Cobalt or Ford Focus. Modern safety standards have made the Camaro what it is today, not lack of forethought or insight from GM's engineers.

That is not to say that there isn't room for a smaller 3-series sized line of RWD sports coupes powered by turbo Ecotecs in GM's line-up. It is only to say that such a car shouldn't be called "Camaro" and more correctly should probably be limited to Cadillac's line-up. And thus with the current recession and economies of scale, GM really needs to be focusing on inexpensive and efficient appliance cars for the average consumer. In a nutshell, the Cruze and Orlando are where they should be focusing their attention moving forward. Keep the Camaro alive on Zeta until GM turns the corner and can afford to spend a little money developing future niche vehicles like the Corvette and Camaro without having Washington and the Press jumping down their throats.
jg95z28 is offline  
Old 01-14-2009, 06:22 PM
  #39  
Registered User
 
97z28/m6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: oshawa,ontario,canada
Posts: 3,597
Originally Posted by jg95z28

That is not to say that there isn't room for a smaller 3-series sized line of RWD sports coupes powered by turbo Ecotecs in GM's line-up. It is only to say that such a car shouldn't be called "Camaro" and more correctly should probably be limited to Cadillac's line-up. .
i'd love a RWD "cobalt SS"
97z28/m6 is offline  
Old 01-14-2009, 07:44 PM
  #40  
Registered User
 
Gold_Rush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,870
Originally Posted by Z284ever

Personally, I'd be happy with a 4, a turbo 4, and a V8 line up.

200 hp, 300 hp, 400 hp.
Sounds good but i wouldn't mind seeing a small turbo 6 like the 2.8 or 3.0 in that middle 300hp bracket either.
Gold_Rush is offline  
Old 01-14-2009, 09:09 PM
  #41  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Z284ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicagoland IL
Posts: 16,179
Originally Posted by Gold_Rush
Sounds good but i wouldn't mind seeing a small turbo 6 like the 2.8 or 3.0 in that middle 300hp bracket either.
I wouldn't mind either. But I figured the other way would keep it CAFE positive enough to protect the availability of a V8.
Z284ever is offline  
Old 01-15-2009, 09:23 AM
  #42  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Z284ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicagoland IL
Posts: 16,179
Originally Posted by SSbaby
All I will agree on is that the 5th Gen is a Camaro in every way. It's designed right (aggressive while beautiful). Has the right powertrains (V8 is still king otherwise what's the point of Camaro?). It's going to be priced right. It's the perfect modern day muscle car that will do its heritage proud.

Those who are on the 4 cyl turbo bandwagon are just destroying it's link to past Camaros... effectively sealing its fate. A Camaro is not a small car in the tradition of a BMW 3-series. European cars are too small for American (and Aussie) muscle car enthusiasts.
Of course, you have a right to your own opinion, but considering where you live, have you even ever seen, ridden in, driven or owned a Camaro?
Z284ever is offline  
Old 01-15-2009, 09:41 AM
  #43  
Registered User
 
Z28x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 10,287
Originally Posted by Z284ever
Originally Posted by SSbaby
Those who are on the 4 cyl turbo bandwagon are just destroying it's link to past Camaros... effectively sealing its fate. A Camaro is not a small car in the tradition of a BMW 3-series. European cars are too small for American (and Aussie) muscle car enthusiasts.
Of course, you have a right to your own opinion, but considering where you live, have you even ever seen, ridden in, driven or owned a Camaro?
3 series too small? He needs to take a ride in a 4th gen. Big car with smaller than Aveo interior. I'd love Camaro interior as big as the 3 series interior.
Z28x is offline  
Old 01-15-2009, 10:00 AM
  #44  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Z284ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicagoland IL
Posts: 16,179
Originally Posted by Z28x
3 series too small? He needs to take a ride in a 4th gen. Big car with smaller than Aveo interior. I'd love Camaro interior as big as the 3 series interior.
The 3 series interior seems QUITE ABIT bigger than a 3rd or 4th gen - especially the back seat. In fact, I'd probably say that the 1 series coupe is closer in interior space to the Camaros we're used to.

The 5th gen back seat seemed to have alittle more leg room than previous Camaros though. But even the 5th gen doesn't feel roomier than a 3 series coupe - front seats or back. In fact the 3 coupe might even have abit more headroom in the back than the 5th gen. Not that this would influence any sort of buying decision for me.
Z284ever is offline  
Old 01-15-2009, 11:18 AM
  #45  
Registered User
 
zachisageek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Racine, WI
Posts: 112
Originally Posted by Z284ever
In fact, I'd probably say that the 1 series coupe is closer in interior space to the Camaros we're used to.
Have a look at the 135i vs. M3 some time. The 3 series (like most cars) have become so bloated, that the 135i can dust an M3 in a drag race and around corners.
zachisageek is offline  


Quick Reply: Lutz mentions 6th gen Camaro!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:31 AM.