Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

LS7...not so good

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 03:18 PM
  #46  
thesoundandthefury's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 862
From: Columbus, IN
Re: LS7...not so good

Originally Posted by Hoodshaker
There are many benefits to the Hypereutectic piston but if you look at the design of the engine, WEIGHT was probably the #1 factor in the decision. They are considerably lighter than a forged piston would be. Can anyone think why that might be important on a 427 cubic inch engine that spins to 7K?
But...but...our cousin Darryl heard from his brother Darryl who heard from his other brother Darryl that them dag'gone hyper-YOO-tactics ain't good fer nothin' but ashtrays and spitoons!

You'da thunk them thar' city slicker college boy injuneers coulda dun figgered that out by now if they wern't so bizzy playin' with them fancy tella-scope-thinga-majiggers and buildin' motors like cousin Darryl does! Knowhutimean?
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 03:22 PM
  #47  
graham's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,887
From: northeast Miss.
Re: LS7...not so good

Nah, we buy them from that Damned Yankee down the road who is always so expensive and says g**-damn all the time....

Old Dec 1, 2005 | 02:00 AM
  #48  
RussStang's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,011
From: Exton, Pennsylvania
Re: LS7...not so good

Originally Posted by graham
The deal with the forged pistons is that cast pistons (hypereutectic or not) have an offset pin bore to minimise noise on cold startup. That's why they have a dot on top to indicate the front of the motor. Forged pistons can be put in either way as long as the valve reliefs are symmetrical.

The "piston slap" we speak of in this thread has notihng to do with that. Chevy is just a lil inconsistent with its finish hone and there is just a fuzz too much cyl wall clearance until the piston gets a lil heat in it and expands a fuzz. No biggie actually.

I've met probably no less than 20 GM vehicle owners that hear a little lifter chatter and say that its piston slap. When they just really need to change their oil filter more frequently, lol. Some fools even hear the "click" of the injectors and think something is "ticking" inside the motor. lol

Its also my understanding that a forged piston can make life hard on a knock sensor too but i dunno...

I have piston slap constantly, it just goes away some when the engine is warmed. It is still there though, it isn't that hard to hear. This is something GM knows about, and I am sure they are trying their damnedest to make sure their $70,000 car makes no engine noise whatsoever, cold startup or otherwise. I don't know if this is the reason why their are cast pistons running in the LS7, but I wouldn't put it past GM, given how notorious these engines are for making noise.
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 03:06 AM
  #49  
mastrdrver's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,817
From: O-Town
Re: LS7...not so good

Originally Posted by Hoodshaker
I don't think cost had much to do with piston selection, if at all. The engine has lots of exotic parts that are not cheap, and I don't think they skimped here. There are many benefits to the Hypereutectic piston but if you look at the design of the engine, WEIGHT was probably the #1 factor in the decision. They are considerably lighter than a forged piston would be. Can anyone think why that might be important on a 427 cubic inch engine that spins to 7K? Those are very large pistons to sling around at that rpm...
EXACTLY!

Also, how would you protect such a exspensive roatating assembly from stupid people and wanting warrenty work on the motor after it blows?

But, I have to say that the weight thing probably had more to do with the decision. Kind of funny, I'm sure if this was in a BMW people would think it would have been a fluke, but IF this is true, then it is just another piece of cramp from GM.

Last edited by mastrdrver; Dec 1, 2005 at 03:24 AM.
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 06:33 AM
  #50  
PacerX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,979
Re: LS7...not so good

Originally Posted by mastrdrver
EXACTLY!

Also, how would you protect such a exspensive roatating assembly from stupid people and wanting warrenty work on the motor after it blows?

But, I have to say that the weight thing probably had more to do with the decision. Kind of funny, I'm sure if this was in a BMW people would think it would have been a fluke, but IF this is true, then it is just another piece of cramp from GM.
Why exactly are you asserting that a forged piston has to be heavier than a cast one?

The specific density of the materials is close, and as long as the cast part has no voids (which have a good chance of causing catastrophic failure and are a problem the forging simply doesn't have), the difference in density is offset by the fact that the forged piston can be designed with thinner walls due to it's inherently higher yield and ultimate tensile strength.

I'm not buying without better information, so please support your position with some data or other evidence.

Here's a little blurb from a performance company on the issue:

"There are disadvantages (to cast pistons) also, of course. The piston will be weaker in structure. It is often heavier since the manufacturer has to increase wall thickness in order to achieve sufficient strength. The heat expansion cannot be controlled and is therefore often not completely round since the piston pin requires some material on the inside. They are also produced in bulk with most manufacturers only producing sizes that are close to factory specifications. This also makes them more affordable."

Last edited by PacerX; Dec 1, 2005 at 06:41 AM.
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 04:24 PM
  #51  
30thZ286speed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,030
From: Frankfort, KY U.S.A.
Re: LS7...not so good

This whole thing is more than likey more rumors than facts
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 05:28 PM
  #52  
Hoodshaker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 284
From: Van Nuys, Ca.
Re: LS7...not so good

Originally Posted by PacerX
Why exactly are you asserting that a forged piston has to be heavier than a cast one?

The specific density of the materials is close, and as long as the cast part has no voids (which have a good chance of causing catastrophic failure and are a problem the forging simply doesn't have), the difference in density is offset by the fact that the forged piston can be designed with thinner walls due to it's inherently higher yield and ultimate tensile strength.

I'm not buying without better information, so please support your position with some data or other evidence.

Here's a little blurb from a performance company on the issue:

"There are disadvantages (to cast pistons) also, of course. The piston will be weaker in structure. It is often heavier since the manufacturer has to increase wall thickness in order to achieve sufficient strength. The heat expansion cannot be controlled and is therefore often not completely round since the piston pin requires some material on the inside. They are also produced in bulk with most manufacturers only producing sizes that are close to factory specifications. This also makes them more affordable."

Hypereutectic alloys are also slightly lighter (about 2 percent) than standard alloys. But the castings are often made thinner because the alloy is stronger, resulting in a net reduction of up to 10 percent in the piston’s total weight.
Read that and more here http://www.aa1car.com/library/2003/eb40354.htm

Remember we aren't talking about standard cast pistons vs forged, we're talking about hypereutectic pistons which contain at least 12.5% silicon for additional strength, less weight, better expansion/contraction properties which allows tighter tolerances for less noise, less blow-bye etc.
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 05:35 PM
  #53  
SSbaby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,123
From: Melbourne, Australia
Re: LS7...not so good

Originally Posted by 30thZ286speed
This whole thing is more than likey more rumors than facts
Given anyone who buys Z06 C6 would be an absolute enthusiast, I think owners of such vehicles would regularly contribute to reputable boards such as this one if they ran into a few technical problems with engines.

In other words, such information would come across as first hand... not innuendo.
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 06:12 PM
  #54  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Re: LS7...not so good

Originally Posted by thesoundandthefury
Forged pistons are noisier than hypereutectic. I'm sorry, it's just reality. Yet you said yourself that the piston slap in your LS1 left you with the impression that it was an "inferior" engine to your LT1. Do you honestly think that GM didn't take this into account when they built the LS7? Does it make sense that they would utilize a piston who's level of noise production could be mistakenly perceived as being the same condition found in the LS1, and therefore risk the impression of it being an "inferior" engine? Read between the lines.

Lemme break this down even further. If you had to choose between two "bad impressions" that the car you're building would go down in history as being known for, which would it be:

-Couldn't run NOS without changing the pistons

or

-A $70,000 Corvette with an engine that sounds like it came out of a $25,000
Camaro

Don't really give a hoot about NOS (to me it's lame, lowdown cheating anyway). But a high performance engine in an expensive car should IMO have parts that would make it bulletproof.

Noise was never a problem in my 5.0s, Ford's Mustang Cobras seem to have been able to make forged pistons that don't clank when cold, and my SC (outside of slight supercharger whine and Ford's typical noisy power steering pump) doesn't make a racket, so I don't buy theForged Pistons=Piston Slap school of thought.

Frankly, I know I'll never buy this Corvette or it's engine, even if I had the money (I feel the regular Corvette at 45K is a superior bargain to a $70K one....is it worth $25K over a regular Vette?! ), so on a practical basis, the LS7 pistons could be made of glass for all that affects me.
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 07:26 PM
  #55  
SSbaby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,123
From: Melbourne, Australia
Re: LS7...not so good

I'd sell my left nut for an LS7!!!
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 08:15 PM
  #56  
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,000
From: TX Med Ctr
Re: LS7...not so good

Originally Posted by guionM
Frankly, I know I'll never buy this Corvette or it's engine, even if I had the money (I feel the regular Corvette at 45K is a superior bargain to a $70K one....is it worth $25K over a regular Vette?! ),
But the Z06 badges alone are worth $15,000.
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 09:41 PM
  #57  
91Z28350's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,011
Re: LS7...not so good

Originally Posted by SSbaby
I'd sell my left nut for an LS7!!!
Right Nut " WTF is so special about the left nut? Why aren't we ever pimped out for something special?"
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 03:49 PM
  #58  
PacerX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,979
Re: LS7...not so good

Originally Posted by Hoodshaker
Read that and more here http://www.aa1car.com/library/2003/eb40354.htm

Remember we aren't talking about standard cast pistons vs forged, we're talking about hypereutectic pistons which contain at least 12.5% silicon for additional strength, less weight, better expansion/contraction properties which allows tighter tolerances for less noise, less blow-bye etc.
Wait a second here, your example is flat-out wrong.

The example above from the article is addressing cast hypereutectic vs. cast eutectic, and doesn't address forgings at all.

A hypereutectic cast piston is decidedly inferior to a forged piston of suitable material from a strength standpoint. Casting does not provide the grain control of forging, regardless of alloy.
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 05:24 PM
  #59  
Hoodshaker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 284
From: Van Nuys, Ca.
Re: LS7...not so good

Originally Posted by PacerX
Wait a second here, your example is flat-out wrong.

The example above from the article is addressing cast hypereutectic vs. cast eutectic, and doesn't address forgings at all.

A hypereutectic cast piston is decidedly inferior to a forged piston of suitable material from a strength standpoint. Casting does not provide the grain control of forging, regardless of alloy.
From a strength stand point, there is no question as to the superiority of the forged piston. However there is a weight penalty. That article was to address your point that the cast piston would require reinforcement that would make it heavier than a forged one. Perhaps that would be true if you were trying to make a cast piston with the exact same strength as a forged one. The benefit of a hyperuetectic is that it is stronger than a regular cast piston, yet lighter than a forged one. That seems about right for this application. I don't think a naturally aspirated LS7 that is not detonated will have a problem. If you run it way lean, you may have a problem. The factory tune will not allow this. But undoubtedly some of us that like to mod our cars will make mistakes like poor aftermarket tunes or poorly designed/underfueled forced induction and nitrous systems. That's our fault, not a design flaw of the car. So in conclusion I think they had to decide whether to go with a lighter piston that can't take as much blatent abuse vesus a heavier one that would have forced them to to lower the max rpm to protect the assembly, and miss out on some hp because of it. The slower revs and extra stress on the crank isn't worth it when the hyper is strong enough unless severely abused. Anything could be stronger. A lead parachute would never tear, but I think the benefit is outweighed by the penalty.

More on the subject that speaks directly to cast vs forged. http://www.glmmarine.com/castvsforged.html

The major disadvantages to forged pistons are actually a result of the forging process itself. Forging results in a piston that is considerably heavier, than cast pistons, and is limited in the aluminum alloys that can be used to produce the piston. Additionally, the forging process also limits the design configuration of the piston itself.
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 07:12 PM
  #60  
1fastdog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,808
From: FL/MI
Re: LS7...not so good

Originally Posted by PacerX
Cast (regardless of post-processing and metallurgy in the case of common piston materials) is less expensive than forged.

Now, the guy that sprayed the car and blew up his motor got what he deserved, and in no way is GM responsible...

BUT...

... all in all I think the inclusion of hyper-u-explode-it pistons in the LS7 is major failing on the part of Powertrain. There will be all kinds of reasons one way or another, and certainly trade-offs (expansion and noise come to mind...), but the overriding goal for the LS7 MUST BE a bullet-proof short block. Forged pistons are the way to remove a possible weak link.
Bulletproof is not a synonymous term for idiot proof..

Nothing at all "wrong" with the LS7. If you haven't driven a car with the new LS7... which I have... then allow a little room for doubt about "issies" in this foolishness.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:05 PM.