LED Taillights trend
LED Taillights trend
I've noticed a lot more vicheals coming from the factory using LED taillights. Id imange this would have a few advantages.
1. Less power used
2. One goes bad the rest are still good.
3. Long lasting.
Trade off would be:
1. Higher cost up front.
2. Having to replace the whole unit.
Am I wrong on these assumptions?
1. Less power used
2. One goes bad the rest are still good.
3. Long lasting.
Trade off would be:
1. Higher cost up front.
2. Having to replace the whole unit.
Am I wrong on these assumptions?
I also think the LED unit is lighter than a comparative bulb and socket (although it is miniscule).
Plus, LEDs last forever I think.
From an ergonomic standpoint, I've noticed that I react faster to LED brake lights because they come on and off much quicker than bulbs without the "fade in/out" effect.
Plus, LEDs last forever I think.
From an ergonomic standpoint, I've noticed that I react faster to LED brake lights because they come on and off much quicker than bulbs without the "fade in/out" effect.
I put LED's on the back of my 75 chevy short bed step side C-10...love them..low maintenance, no bulb breakage due to vibration or shorts due to water getting in lense. they are very bright. if you can get them your your application consider it. for me they were a good investment...
G
G
Just a guess, but I can't see an LED cluster being any lighter than a regular reflector and bulb, at least not with the number of LEDs most taillights are using. And with all those bulbs I can't see it consuming any less power either.
LEDs are great for indicators, where high light output is not a concern. But once you start needing higher candlepower their power consumption and heat output advantages versus incadescent bulbs is not as great.
LEDs are great for indicators, where high light output is not a concern. But once you start needing higher candlepower their power consumption and heat output advantages versus incadescent bulbs is not as great.
LEDs are way better IMO.
They last a pretty long time, much longer than bulbs. And I think they look better and are more visible.
The only downside is the cost of replacement once they do go out, however that cost has come down alot.
They last a pretty long time, much longer than bulbs. And I think they look better and are more visible.
The only downside is the cost of replacement once they do go out, however that cost has come down alot.
Just a guess, but I can't see an LED cluster being any lighter than a regular reflector and bulb, at least not with the number of LEDs most taillights are using. And with all those bulbs I can't see it consuming any less power either.
LEDs are great for indicators, where high light output is not a concern. But once you start needing higher candlepower their power consumption and heat output advantages versus incadescent bulbs is not as great.
LEDs are great for indicators, where high light output is not a concern. But once you start needing higher candlepower their power consumption and heat output advantages versus incadescent bulbs is not as great.
Led "bulbs" are not the same as conventional bulbs. Just because there may be 20 bulbs in a LED tail lamp assy, it doesn't mean it requires the same power as 20 incandescent bulbs.. I believe even Xenon headlamps are more energy efficient than conventional halogen headlamps, but require higher voltage.
There's all sorts of stuff related to LED headlamp technology...look on google. A draft has already been approved by the SAE, and if memory serves me correctly, they are still working on achieving the correct light spectrum for LED headlamps.
Just a guess, but I can't see an LED cluster being any lighter than a regular reflector and bulb, at least not with the number of LEDs most taillights are using. And with all those bulbs I can't see it consuming any less power either.
LEDs are great for indicators, where high light output is not a concern. But once you start needing higher candlepower their power consumption and heat output advantages versus incadescent bulbs is not as great.
LEDs are great for indicators, where high light output is not a concern. But once you start needing higher candlepower their power consumption and heat output advantages versus incadescent bulbs is not as great.
LED's actually draw VERY LITTLE current, and if you just try to "plug one in" like you would a light bulb, they often don't work. You have to wire in a given amount of resistance into the circuit to bring the voltage down to the level that the LED actually requires. So overall, I guess they would use almost the "same" amount (given the fact of an in-line resistor) but the LED's themselves are almost negligable for power consumption
.
.
I also think the LED unit is lighter than a comparative bulb and socket (although it is miniscule).
Plus, LEDs last forever I think.
From an ergonomic standpoint, I've noticed that I react faster to LED brake lights because they come on and off much quicker than bulbs without the "fade in/out" effect.
Plus, LEDs last forever I think.
From an ergonomic standpoint, I've noticed that I react faster to LED brake lights because they come on and off much quicker than bulbs without the "fade in/out" effect.
Question for those who know about such things:
The final version of the Lincoln Mark VIII (in addition to using HID lighting up front) used a Neon lighting tube as the full width tail light. Those things (for some strange reason) seem to cut through fog better than conventional lights. Why haven't that lighting technology caught on? What's the drawbacks? Serious question.
I've always wondered about that, and since we're on the subject, and I see at least 1 person who seems to be an expert on this.... ?
I have a few LEDs out in my 3rd brake light on the SS. So they do go out. It bugs me so I've been wondering how I can find a replacement for the board. Any ideas? 
I remember that big neon tail light on the Mark VIII cars. I'm thinking perhaps they can't make the neon burn bright enough to be a viable option for headlights? I'm no expert so I don't know.

I remember that big neon tail light on the Mark VIII cars. I'm thinking perhaps they can't make the neon burn bright enough to be a viable option for headlights? I'm no expert so I don't know.


