Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Lamborghini Ferruccio

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 09:15 AM
  #1  
Gripenfelter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,647
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Lamborghini Ferruccio



By Mike Elwin

First official pictures

01 April 2008 10:57

This is the Lamborghini that never was: the stillborn Ferruccio project that has just been put on ice owing to a lack of orders.



Designed by Italian coachbuilder Magvisio, the Ferruccio was a rebodied Murcielago LP640 and would have been faster than any current car wearing the Lamborghini badge, with a claimed top speed of 230mph. Although not an official Lamborghini project, Sant'Agata was monitoring the scheme ‘with interest’, according to its creators.



Magvisio specialises in customisation jobs for private clients, and the Ferruccio was to be its first stab at designing a car from the ground up. The concept is named after the founder of Automobili Lamborghini, Ferruccio Lamborghini.

Designer Pule Magau told CAR Online this week: ‘We have only had three orders, and no one has put down a deposit yet. Let’s just say it’s on ice.’

Ferruccio: a harder, faster Murcielago



On the outside the Ferruccio takes design cues from Lambos of the past, with rear haunches from the Countach and ‘eyelash’ light clusters from the Miura. And under that dramatic bodywork, it is based on the LP640, borrowing its 6.5-litre V12 and four-wheel drive system.

That means 630bhp and 660lb ft of torque with performance figures to match. Magvisio claims a 0-60mph time of 3.0sec dead, with 100mph dispatched in a smidgeon under six.



Dinner plate 330mm ceramic discs with six-pot callipers keep the Ferruccio on the straight and narrow. The body and chassis are made from lightweight carbon-fibre composites to keep weight down. The cabin is sprinkled with lightweight materials too – the seats are carbon, the dash is carbon and the doors are carbon. And you wonder why this car would have been so expensive...

Old Apr 5, 2008 | 09:18 AM
  #2  
Gripenfelter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,647
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Anyone else notice the rear tire mounted backwards?
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 09:31 AM
  #3  
CLEAN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,574
From: Arlington, Texas
LOL, I was gonna say, that was the first thing I noticed! Hard to order a car from a company that can't even put tires on a 230mph car correctly.
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 11:00 AM
  #4  
Gripenfelter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,647
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Well its the artist's fault actually.
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 11:25 AM
  #5  
YARDofSTUF's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 456
From: USA
Side view is kinda ugly.
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 11:38 AM
  #6  
DAKMOR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,406
From: Philaduhphia
And their reputation has been saved.
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 11:55 AM
  #7  
R377's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,712
From: Ontario
Is there any way to stop the forum software from re-sizing the pictures and making them all jaggy?
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 12:19 PM
  #8  
ckt101's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 385
From: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by Gripenfelter
Anyone else notice the rear tire mounted backwards?
Seriously, I must be dumb with tires, but I can't see that in any of the pics. How can you tell?
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 12:43 PM
  #9  
Capn Pete's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,308
From: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Originally Posted by ckt101
Seriously, I must be dumb with tires, but I can't see that in any of the pics. How can you tell?
The very first picture of the car, taken from the back. The "V-groove" pattern of the tread is pointing rearward. They should be pointing FORWARD!

Any directional tire of that design should point forward. The artist screwed up.
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 12:51 PM
  #10  
R377's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,712
From: Ontario
Originally Posted by Capn Pete
The very first picture of the car, taken from the back. The "V-groove" pattern of the tread is pointing rearward. They should be pointing FORWARD!

Any directional tire of that design should point forward. The artist screwed up.
Maybe they mounted the tires for maximum braking traction
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 01:12 PM
  #11  
shock6906's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,577
From: Sandy VJJville
Looks like a wanna-be Enzo from the side and like a Toyota MR2 Spyder from the back. I don't really like it.
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 01:35 PM
  #12  
My Red 93Z-28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,503
From: BFE, Ohio
Originally Posted by Capn Pete
The very first picture of the car, taken from the back. The "V-groove" pattern of the tread is pointing rearward. They should be pointing FORWARD!

Any directional tire of that design should point forward. The artist screwed up.
They are...on the bottom

They should be counter-clockwise

Doesn't really look that good to me
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 01:39 PM
  #13  
CLEAN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,574
From: Arlington, Texas
Originally Posted by ckt101
Seriously, I must be dumb with tires, but I can't see that in any of the pics. How can you tell?
In addition to the above explanation, they also have to roll so that the tire can pump water out the side. if you have it reversed, the tire would compress water towards the middle of the tire when driving in the wet. Would make an interesting handler in the rain to be sure.
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 02:23 PM
  #14  
Good Ph.D's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,597
From: Mack and Bewick
Looks overdone, if it were dialed back a bit it could be nice.

One day I hope to be one of the guys who doesen't want a Lamborghini, "like everyone else's"
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 03:43 PM
  #15  
Capn Pete's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,308
From: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Originally Posted by R377
Maybe they mounted the tires for maximum braking traction
I guess so?! Although this isn't a snowmobile track that we're talking about (which often work better for traction if run "backwards", but then you suffer worse braking).

Originally Posted by CLEAN
In addition to the above explanation, they also have to roll so that the tire can pump water out the side. if you have it reversed, the tire would compress water towards the middle of the tire when driving in the wet. Would make an interesting handler in the rain to be sure.
Yes, that is the obvious purpose for running the tires the proper direction . I realize I left the "tech" out of my first response .



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:29 AM.