Lamborghini Ferruccio
Lamborghini Ferruccio

By Mike Elwin
First official pictures
01 April 2008 10:57
This is the Lamborghini that never was: the stillborn Ferruccio project that has just been put on ice owing to a lack of orders.

Designed by Italian coachbuilder Magvisio, the Ferruccio was a rebodied Murcielago LP640 and would have been faster than any current car wearing the Lamborghini badge, with a claimed top speed of 230mph. Although not an official Lamborghini project, Sant'Agata was monitoring the scheme ‘with interest’, according to its creators.

Magvisio specialises in customisation jobs for private clients, and the Ferruccio was to be its first stab at designing a car from the ground up. The concept is named after the founder of Automobili Lamborghini, Ferruccio Lamborghini.
Designer Pule Magau told CAR Online this week: ‘We have only had three orders, and no one has put down a deposit yet. Let’s just say it’s on ice.’
Ferruccio: a harder, faster Murcielago

On the outside the Ferruccio takes design cues from Lambos of the past, with rear haunches from the Countach and ‘eyelash’ light clusters from the Miura. And under that dramatic bodywork, it is based on the LP640, borrowing its 6.5-litre V12 and four-wheel drive system.
That means 630bhp and 660lb ft of torque with performance figures to match. Magvisio claims a 0-60mph time of 3.0sec dead, with 100mph dispatched in a smidgeon under six.

Dinner plate 330mm ceramic discs with six-pot callipers keep the Ferruccio on the straight and narrow. The body and chassis are made from lightweight carbon-fibre composites to keep weight down. The cabin is sprinkled with lightweight materials too – the seats are carbon, the dash is carbon and the doors are carbon. And you wonder why this car would have been so expensive...

Any directional tire of that design should point forward. The artist screwed up.

They should be counter-clockwise
Doesn't really look that good to me
In addition to the above explanation, they also have to roll so that the tire can pump water out the side. if you have it reversed, the tire would compress water towards the middle of the tire when driving in the wet. Would make an interesting handler in the rain to be sure.
I guess so?!
Although this isn't a snowmobile track that we're talking about
(which often work better for traction if run "backwards", but then you suffer worse braking).
Yes, that is the obvious purpose for running the tires the proper direction
. I realize I left the "tech" out of my first response
.
Although this isn't a snowmobile track that we're talking about
(which often work better for traction if run "backwards", but then you suffer worse braking).In addition to the above explanation, they also have to roll so that the tire can pump water out the side. if you have it reversed, the tire would compress water towards the middle of the tire when driving in the wet. Would make an interesting handler in the rain to be sure.
.


