Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

It's Official - Exxon Hits Record Profits for Any Corporation Ever

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 26, 2008 | 06:42 AM
  #331  
SSbaby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,123
From: Melbourne, Australia
Originally Posted by indieaz
^If it wasn't a supply/demand issue...why would opec cut production? IF it had nothing to do with oil demand cutting consumption would have no effect.

Gasoline and oil inventories are all up more than expected...a clear indication of demand destruction (unless you believe they make all that **** up). All you have to do is remove yoru tin foil hat a few times a day and read some articles. One of thousands of examples right now if you search google news will pull up this: http://www.reuters.com/article/domes...49K7ES20081021.
How could you possibly say that when the price has more than doubled and fallen by almost the same amount in a relatively short period... then you have the gall to use a measly figure of 6.4% to justify the equation.

Please don't pass off that stupidity as sound reason, I'm far too clever than that!

To answer your question regarding OPEC... that's baloney. They'll say what the main consumers want them to say. They'll make their money regardless. People depend on oil. It's a necessity, so even if the price skyrockets, the drop in demand is not great!

Please also explain how the reasons for the increase was due to China and India consuming too much... what now, don't tell me they've stopped using oil. That $2,000 Indian car must have been a huge flop, hey!
Old Oct 26, 2008 | 12:47 PM
  #332  
5thgen69camaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,802
From: Annapolis MD
Originally Posted by muckz
OK, I will answer the S&D crowd

There are great economic slowdowns happening. You bet that the demand for EVERYTHING will go down as people will concentrate on day-to-day survival, at least if we're going to end up in a depression (and while I'm not claiming that it will happen for sure, there is good indication that it might). But, IS IT HAPPENING RIGHT NOW? And if yes, to what extent?

It's not like we hit depression between July 2008 and now, October 2008, and people started realizing that they cannot afford gas. It's not like people started to divert money away from gasoline to foods, at least not yet. This is a too short period of time.

People's driving habits in North America did not change much when gas was going up steadily yet steeply. Then gas became cheaper, and prices at the pump fell. Wouldn't this encourage people to resume their driving habits? That would ensure the demand, if it dropped due to extraordinary high price of crude in July, would now start to climb back up, no?

Now that OPEC cut production, thus reducing SUPPLY, the prices do not seem to change. Maybe it will take time, we'll see, but so far no changes in the upward direction. On the contrary, they fell more.

If you are suggesting that the entire world is using less gas right now, and that's why prices are cheaper - I have a question for you. Is that so? It could be so, but I don't see the evidence for it. Maybe I'm not looking for that evidence at the right places, so if you do, I'll be glad to read it. Are people driving less these days? Are transportation companies shutting down because they cannot afford gas? To what extent is the transportation industry affected RIGHT NOW to cause a drop in demand? I am not saying that it is not happening, but so far, I don't see the evidence for this. It appears that the business is as usual for most, and everyone's attention is on the worldwide economy.

Once worldwide depression ensues (if it will, that is), that's when you can expect companies shutting down, and that's when demand for gasoline will wane, to be replaced by diversion of funds toward essentials - food, clothing, housing.

Basically, to summarize, we have not seen any global changes that would affect the daily use of gasoline. No region started to move to ethanol in the last 3 months. No region converted to electrical cars (read up on Shai Agassi's project - very intriguing). There are no food shortages at grocery stores to indicate that transportation companies closed their doors. Strikes by truckers on high oil prices have stopped. Everything returned to normal, now that has is 50% cheaper than it was in July.
Yes OPEC cut prices because the price dropped more than they liked. They did it as they always do to reduce supply and bring up price. It hasnt had an effect yet but I think it will. Thats the whole purpose of OPEC to control price by adjusting supply to get the price they want.

Why its dropped now Im not sure. Like you said people have been cutting back on everything. I went to 3 brothers resturant the day the stocks feel the first day and it was uncarachteristicly empty. Completely. Gas to get to resterants and other things is cutting back, and Im sure people are cutting back on going places that arent neccesary. I dont know about lay offs but if there has been thats people not even driving to work but I doubt that has happened that quickly. Is this a reason for the drop? I dont know. Just some ideas...
Old Oct 26, 2008 | 12:52 PM
  #333  
5thgen69camaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,802
From: Annapolis MD
Originally Posted by SSbaby
To answer your question regarding OPEC... that's baloney. They'll say what the main consumers want them to say. They'll make their money regardless. People depend on oil. It's a necessity, so even if the price skyrockets, the drop in demand is not great!
I may be a glutton for a headache here but what do you think the reason for OPECs existance is if not as a make shift monopoly to adjust supply Supply to get the desired profit?
Old Oct 26, 2008 | 06:09 PM
  #334  
SSbaby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,123
From: Melbourne, Australia
Originally Posted by 5thgen69camaro
I may be a glutton for a headache here but what do you think the reason for OPECs existance is if not as a make shift monopoly to adjust supply Supply to get the desired profit?
Google is your best friend.

http://www.opec.org/home/

But please, don't avoid the basic question... oil is just on $60/bbl today and using the above figures of 6.4% drop in oil demand, there is no good reason for oil to more than double (> $US140) and restore its price in a little over a year. And that's with OPEC's influence. Now explain to me what OPEC's role was, again!

The oil price increase is probably what caused the global economic downturn in the first place... families on the edge, tipped over the edge. Result? Houses and business being lost to the banks...
Old Oct 26, 2008 | 06:54 PM
  #335  
indieaz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 915
From: Tucson, AZ
Originally Posted by SSbaby
Please also explain how the reasons for the increase was due to China and India consuming too much... what now, don't tell me they've stopped using oil. That $2,000 Indian car must have been a huge flop, hey!
The US is the world's largest oil product, thus we have the biggest effect on prices. 8.5% drop in demand here in the the last 4 weeks versus last year (http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...Q&refer=canada).

Couple that with poor economic conditions worldwide (including China) and stagnant if not lower oil demand globally and you get lower prices. It's simple. There is a grand conspiracy - that conspiracy is to keep production as close to demand as possible to maximize profits. Beyond that, it's unprovable conspiracy theories.
Old Oct 26, 2008 | 10:23 PM
  #336  
SSbaby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,123
From: Melbourne, Australia
Originally Posted by indieaz

Couple that with poor economic conditions worldwide (including China) and
Errr, did you read the link you supplied, by any chance?

China's gross domestic product increased 9 percent in the third quarter from a year earlier, the weakest pace in five years, as the global slowdown saps demand for Chinese products. China is the world's biggest oil consumer, after the U.S.
So given China (mainly) was blamed for the price increases previously, and, IN FACT, China is still experiencing growth, hasn't that reason now proven to be inaccurate (dropping from $147 to $60)?
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 02:08 PM
  #337  
5thgen69camaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,802
From: Annapolis MD
Originally Posted by SSbaby
Google is your best friend.

http://www.opec.org/home/

But please, don't avoid the basic question... oil is just on $60/bbl today and using the above figures of 6.4% drop in oil demand, there is no good reason for oil to more than double (> $US140) and restore its price in a little over a year. And that's with OPEC's influence. Now explain to me what OPEC's role was, again!

The oil price increase is probably what caused the global economic downturn in the first place... families on the edge, tipped over the edge. Result? Houses and business being lost to the banks...
From your link

http://www.opec.org/home/ OPEC's mission is to coordinate and unify the petroleum policies of Member Countries and ensure the stabilization of oil markets in order to secure an efficient, economic and regular supply of petroleum to consumers, a steady income to producers and a fair return on capital to those investing in the petroleum industry.

How they ensure a "fair" return on capital, is through the makeshift Monopoly as Ive said. They adjust supply as demand fluctuates to get the profit they want. Oil is NOT what caused overinflated housing bubble to burst. They were way over inflated
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 02:58 PM
  #338  
5thgen69camaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,802
From: Annapolis MD
Originally Posted by indieaz
The US is the world's largest oil product, thus we have the biggest effect on prices. 8.5% drop in demand here in the the last 4 weeks versus last year (http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...Q&refer=canada).

Couple that with poor economic conditions worldwide (including China) and stagnant if not lower oil demand globally and you get lower prices. It's simple. There is a grand conspiracy - that conspiracy is to keep production as close to demand as possible to maximize profits. Beyond that, it's unprovable conspiracy theories.
excellent link! Thanks
Old Jan 30, 2009 | 09:38 AM
  #339  
super83Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,214
From: City of Champions, MA, USA
Good to know they are still cranking them out of the park.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28931011
Old Jan 30, 2009 | 05:52 PM
  #340  
SSbaby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,123
From: Melbourne, Australia
Originally Posted by super83Z
Good to know they are still cranking them out of the park.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28931011
Irving, Texas-based Exxon said net income slid sharply to $7.8 billion, or $1.55 a share, in the October-December period. That compared to $11.7 billion, or $2.13 a share, in the same period a year ago, when Exxon set a U.S. record for quarterly profit.
That's still a healthy profit despite the low oil prices for that period. It seems the low oil prices do not seem to adversely affect EM's bottom line. A huge profit is still a huge profit.

Despite the fall in profits for the last quarter, I don't see that jobs will be at risk at EM despite the concerns from some here.
Old Jan 31, 2009 | 04:09 PM
  #341  
ProudPony's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,180
From: Yadkinville, NC USA
Originally Posted by super83Z
Good to know they are still cranking them out of the park.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28931011
I thought aabout bringing this old thread back to gage the temperment of folks now that gas is back below $2/gal, but decided not to lame sorryness!

There has been much said and uncovered regarding the fleecing we took last year. Several documentaries on the subject. I find it interesting that those who said it was all market-driven supply/demand have not tried to discredit the investigative journalists who have now interviewed and written about the investor who bailed from oil because of fears of governmental intervention and also because of the explosion in foreclosures and the housing slump.

It appears that folks in America spend more on their mortgage payments every month than they do on their gasoline... hmmm. The big boys hunt where the big game is.
Old Jan 31, 2009 | 08:56 PM
  #342  
Dest98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 140
From: Dacula, GA
Originally Posted by SSbaby
That's still a healthy profit despite the low oil prices for that period. It seems the low oil prices do not seem to adversely affect EM's bottom line. A huge profit is still a huge profit.
Well you have really let the cat out of the bag with this statement. Surely you would not argue that we're being fleeced at the pump at this point in time yet you are really miffed that this company is so successful and the question is, why? May I suggest Atlas Shrugged the next time you are looking for a little light reading.

Despite the fall in profits for the last quarter, I don't see that jobs will be at risk at EM despite the concerns from some here.
Yes what a crying shame more people aren't losing their jobs. I personally don't like to hear about this happening to anybody at all, except maybe that Wall Street ******* who spent seven figures redecorating his office after accepting bailout money. This is where the real fleecing is going on. I read the other day that less than 10% of executives at financial firms accepting bailout money have been shown the door. This concerns me. XOM, at this time, does not.
Old Feb 1, 2009 | 06:50 PM
  #343  
SSbaby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,123
From: Melbourne, Australia
Originally Posted by Dest98
Yes what a crying shame more people aren't losing their jobs. I personally don't like to hear about this happening to anybody at all, except maybe that Wall Street ******* who spent seven figures redecorating his office after accepting bailout money. This is where the real fleecing is going on. I read the other day that less than 10% of executives at financial firms accepting bailout money have been shown the door. This concerns me. XOM, at this time, does not.
My comment about jobs was in reference to some persons creating panic and hysteria about jobs being lost within the oil industry if oil drops to $30/bbl... allegations which are unfounded (see stars1010 post for reference), if EM's profits are anything to go by.

As far as the banks fleecing us, no arguments from me... see my post!
Old Feb 1, 2009 | 07:48 PM
  #344  
super83Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,214
From: City of Champions, MA, USA
Should just make this one a sticky.
Old Feb 2, 2009 | 01:12 AM
  #345  
5thgen69camaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,802
From: Annapolis MD
j
Originally Posted by ProudPony
There has been much said and uncovered regarding the fleecing we took last year. Several documentaries on the subject. I find it interesting that those who said it was all market-driven supply/demand have not tried to discredit the investigative journalists who have now interviewed and written about the investor who bailed from oil because of fears of governmental intervention and also because of the explosion in foreclosures and the housing slump.

It appears that folks in America spend more on their mortgage payments every month than they do on their gasoline... hmmm. The big boys hunt where the big game is.
I have to admit to not knowing what youre talking about with what investor bailed or what youre driving at so Ill risk sounding dumb here. Who wouldnt bail with risk of govt intervention? Im thinking with the housing slump and market plunge and this is a total guess, that one possible explination in the drop in demand might be a drop in fleet/commercial vehicle use as business dropped, as well as those laid off employees not driving to work everyday maybe? Housing slump and market forclosure explosion is killing demand for most everything. I dont know, but OPEC cut supply its going back up. Im also thinking with the unemployment on the rise housing prices might fall even lower as well with the amount of people that can afford them dropping.

Last edited by 5thgen69camaro; Feb 2, 2009 at 01:17 AM.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:43 AM.