Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Introducing, your 6th gen Camaro lineup*

Old 05-19-2010, 04:05 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Z284ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicagoland IL
Posts: 16,179
Introducing, your 6th gen Camaro lineup*

1) The Budget GT
Camaro Sport Coupe:
-Standard engine: normally aspirated 2.4L Ecotec. 210 hp.
-Optional engine: turbo 2.0L Ecotec. 285 hp.
-F41 performance package available.
Weight: 3350 -3400 pounds (coupe)


2) The Luxury GT
Camaro SS:
-Standard engine: turbo 2.0L Ecotec. 315 hp.
-Optional engine: Gen V 6.2L V8. 415 hp.
-Various high content options available.
Weight: 3450-3575 pounds. (coupe)


3) The Performance GT
Camaro Z/28
-Specific engine: Gen V 6.2L V8. 465 hp.
-Optional engine: None.
-Specific "Special Performance Package"
-Content and options limited.
Weight: 3395 pounds. (coupe only)









* Long way from any final specs or weights, but I'd call these possible - plus it's fun.


Discuss!

Last edited by Z284ever; 05-19-2010 at 04:10 PM.
Z284ever is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 04:32 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
super83Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: City of Champions, MA, USA
Posts: 1,214
What do you think the torque ratings would be on those Ecotecs? I am worried about a 4-cylinder feeling gutless.
super83Z is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 04:38 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Meatyshells's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 218
gen V 6.2?
was thinking more like a 5.5 at 430hp
and 490ish for the z28
Meatyshells is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 04:40 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
z28 justin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Perrysburg, OH
Posts: 427
Good luck on anything with a V8 weighing in less than 3500lbs with a backseat with all the stupid safety crap the gubberment keeps tacking on
z28 justin is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 04:57 PM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Z284ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicagoland IL
Posts: 16,179
Originally Posted by super83Z
What do you think the torque ratings would be on those Ecotecs? I am worried about a 4-cylinder feeling gutless.
My guess? 180-ish lbsft for the 2.4 and 280-ish for the turbos.

Originally Posted by Meatyshells
gen V 6.2?
was thinking more like a 5.5 at 430hp
and 490ish for the z28
The 5.5 is for Corvette racing only. It's a destroked 6.2 not destined for production.

Originally Posted by z28 justin
Good luck on anything with a V8 weighing in less than 3500lbs with a backseat with all the stupid safety crap the gubberment keeps tacking on

Yup, the Z/28's theoretical 3395 pounds will take some 'sweating the details'.
Z284ever is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 05:00 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
z28 justin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Perrysburg, OH
Posts: 427
Originally Posted by Z284ever
Yup, the Z/28's theoretical 3395 pounds will take some 'sweating the details'.
Manual windows, locks, seats. 1LE style, I'd rock a car like that
z28 justin is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 06:15 PM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Z284ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicagoland IL
Posts: 16,179
Originally Posted by z28 justin
Manual windows, locks, seats. 1LE style, I'd rock a car like that
I don't know about manual windows, but I could do without fluff like heated and cooled seats, automatic rear window shades, backup warning sensors, etc..
Z284ever is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 06:40 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
Sixer-Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Coppell, Texas
Posts: 1,215
Weird thinking that checking off an option box will get you an extra 4.2L of engine.
Sixer-Bird is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 06:40 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
Geoff Chadwick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: All around
Posts: 2,154
Didn't I make a comment about a Camaro that jumped from turbo4 to v8?

To me, I cannot see the Turbo 4 replacing a N/A V6. The engine simply costs more to build and maintain while coming with a negative stigma to many consumers (and it would sound like a 4 banger as well). I see the merits of replacing a V6 with a turbo I4 - but not for Camaro.

It makes sense for the new Sonata or the Regal or even Malibu - when you engineer a V6 out of the picture so you only ever have a 4 cylinder lineup with motor mounts and transmissions in the same locations. Then you could hopefully offset the increased engine cost with reducing the overall platform costs and reduce variations along the way.

Now, to the realism of those numbers, the Genesis 2.0T 3294 / 3362 (MT/AT) and the 3.8L is 3389 / 3397 (MT/AT). Possible? Sure. I tend to think though Camaro's worst enemy is the styling department - they need to make the vehicle smaller on the outside and bigger on the inside - which means the long-hood-wide-body styling has to go.
Geoff Chadwick is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 07:31 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
Z28x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 10,287
No 330HP V6?

415HP isn't much for a 6.2L V8 considering a 5.7L non DI was putting out 405HP in 2002 and a 5.0L Mustang V8 is 411HP in 2011. I could see getting that number out of a 5.3 or 5.5L though.
Z28x is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 09:06 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
Ken S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: OR
Posts: 2,368
4 engine options? Too complicated. Just give 2. Whatever has a good balance of power, fuel economy, and cost on the low end, and the 5.5L V8 on the high.


GM should seriously enter the Camaro in Grand Am GT racing, (or an equivalent series) with a factory backed team. Then offer the suspension equipment as GM Performance aftermarket.


Originally Posted by Geoff Chadwick
I tend to think though Camaro's worst enemy is the styling department - they need to make the vehicle smaller on the outside and bigger on the inside - which means the long-hood-wide-body styling has to go.
GM can still go ahead and build the car, but don't bother calling it a Camaro then.
Ken S is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 09:12 PM
  #12  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Z284ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicagoland IL
Posts: 16,179
Originally Posted by Geoff Chadwick
Didn't I make a comment about a Camaro that jumped from turbo4 to v8?

To me, I cannot see the Turbo 4 replacing a N/A V6. The engine simply costs more to build and maintain while coming with a negative stigma to many consumers (and it would sound like a 4 banger as well). I see the merits of replacing a V6 with a turbo I4 - but not for Camaro.
I think if they can squeeze another mpg or two out of a turbo 4 compared to a V6, GM may be willing to eat the extra cost for it. Well, not actually eat it, the rest of the line up would subsidize it. But your point is well taken.

If it gets a V6 it'll probably be a 3.6. I've heard the 3.0 will be leaving the US market since it's theoretical mpg advantage never materialized. It'll go to other markets where displacement limits are an issue. Too bad, since it's a smoother, freer revving motor than the 3.6 - it would have made for a fun engine in a lighter Camaro.
Z284ever is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 09:17 PM
  #13  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Z284ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicagoland IL
Posts: 16,179
Originally Posted by Z28x
No 330HP V6?

415HP isn't much for a 6.2L V8 considering a 5.7L non DI was putting out 405HP in 2002 and a 5.0L Mustang V8 is 411HP in 2011. I could see getting that number out of a 5.3 or 5.5L though.
The only way a pushrod motor competes with a DOHC motor is displacement - 6.2 seems to be the magic number, especially when the DOHC competition has 5.0L.

I think the hp wars are winding down. 415 hp is plenty for a base 6.2L V8 when you consider the the fuel economy and emissions targets it'll have to hit.
Z284ever is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 09:23 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
Ken S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: OR
Posts: 2,368
A lot of signs point to a 5.5L V8 Corvette engine though, so I would guess that is what the Camaro would get.
Ken S is offline  
Old 05-19-2010, 09:29 PM
  #15  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Z284ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicagoland IL
Posts: 16,179
Originally Posted by Ken S
A lot of signs point to a 5.5L V8 Corvette engine though, so I would guess that is what the Camaro would get.
5.5L is not planned for production. Gen V will have 5.3 and 6.2L
Z284ever is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Introducing, your 6th gen Camaro lineup*



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:01 PM.