I'm confused...2007 model year? or calender year?
Re: I'm confused...2007 model year? or calender year?
Originally Posted by guionM
If it debuted in the spring of 2007, it would be a 2008 model year car.
Why couldn't they have it debut in early 2007 as a 2007, even if it is a short run?
Re: I'm confused...2007 model year? or calender year?
I am sooo tired of this cloakl and dagger crap.......192,000 mustangs have sold. GM gave all the sales right to Ford~ How do you not make a Camaro to cut into that market share ? I am losing faith by the bucketfull. Super Dumbasses~
Re: I'm confused...2007 model year? or calender year?
Originally Posted by HardtopSS
If there isn't a concept or some strongly backed talk by Scott by January of 06, I might just go ahead an buy a new GTO. 

That's what I'd do. See the fella above.
Re: I'm confused...2007 model year? or calender year?
18-24 months! What if the car was already approved, but somehow All the insiders couldn't find evidence of it (or knew the consequences of a leak)? It's possible, IMO especially considering the climate of "mums the word", as far as Camaro goes! And isn't it also possible that work began on a 5th gen shortly after it was canceled, even if no one could find any proof! I still say there will be an 07 Camaro, and I hope I'm right!
Re: I'm confused...2007 model year? or calender year?
Originally Posted by SCNGENNFTHGEN
18-24 months! What if the car was already approved, but somehow All the insiders couldn't find evidence of it (or knew the consequences of a leak)? It's possible, IMO especially considering the climate of "mums the word", as far as Camaro goes! And isn't it also possible that work began on a 5th gen shortly after it was canceled, even if no one could find any proof! I still say there will be an 07 Camaro, and I hope I'm right! 

FWIW, there were some "parts" that were already well along before money & resources were frozen and diverted to the GMT900.
Originally Posted by SGT Posaune
Didn't the GTO debut in the spring of 2004 as a 2004?
Why couldn't they have it debut in early 2007 as a 2007, even if it is a short run?
Why couldn't they have it debut in early 2007 as a 2007, even if it is a short run?
It's all based on when the car begins production. The original Mustang went on sale in April 1964. However it's actually a 1965 Mustang not a '64 1/2. The "1/2" came from the press, not Ford, which called it the 1965 Mustang.
Not a new phenomenon.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
F'n1996Z28SS
Cars For Sale
8
Aug 23, 2023 11:19 PM
Lt1son
Drivetrain
1
Dec 31, 2014 01:35 PM
mspennyhughes
South Atlantic
0
Nov 28, 2014 03:22 PM
guionM
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
14
Jun 19, 2002 08:30 AM



