Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

How about a 75hp and 60ft-lbs increase from going to E85 for gas?

Old Jan 14, 2008 | 07:22 PM
  #16  
DOOM Master's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 615
From: Pekin, IL, United States
Originally Posted by Omegalock
And that is the problem. Nobody know where to find the stuff and even if it is available locally it's usually only at one or two stations. I think the last I checked there are SEVEN public gas station in all of Dallas that offer E85 fuel. And I mean that as in Dallas Fort Worth and most of the surrounding communities.
Move to IL. It's everywhere here. Even most of the little towns now have an E85 pump at at station or two. I've been thinking about building an E85 specific engine out of the extra LT1 I've got in the garage.
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 08:43 PM
  #17  
bossco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,977
From: SeVa
Originally Posted by CaminoLS6
Ethanol is fast becoming not only viable, but superior to gasoline.
I dunno about superior, but its got its perks, mix it with a little nitromethane and you got yourself a superior fuel.
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 09:08 PM
  #18  
indieaz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 915
From: Tucson, AZ
Originally Posted by robvas
Ethanol is useless until they find a better way to make it.
Goverment has paid some farmers to replace their corn for E85 with switchgrass. They found they get about 5 times the amount of fuel out of the switchgrass crop with the equivalent amount of inputs (water, land, farm equipment and manpower).

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=...nol-than-corn&

EDIT: rephrase...looks like corn ethanol is generally about 24% (24% of the energy you put into it)...switchgrass is 540% efficient.
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 09:10 PM
  #19  
indieaz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 915
From: Tucson, AZ
Originally Posted by Omegalock
And that is the problem. Nobody know where to find the stuff and even if it is available locally it's usually only at one or two stations. I think the last I checked there are SEVEN public gas station in all of Dallas that offer E85 fuel. And I mean that as in Dallas Fort Worth and most of the surrounding communities.
Interesting...even little old Tucson has multiple E85 stations.
Old Jan 16, 2008 | 04:29 PM
  #20  
FUTURE_OF_GM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 632
From: NC
I would much rather run ethanol... It's a better/more powerful fuel IF the engine is built for it (Unlike the E85 compromises we have today)
Old Jan 16, 2008 | 04:32 PM
  #21  
Silverado C-10's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,897
From: Greenville, SC
^ Is it 10:1 compression? Or is it 9:1?
Old Jan 20, 2008 | 12:28 AM
  #22  
AdioSS's Avatar
West South Central Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,371
From: Kilgore TX 75662
anybody who doesn't care for E85 needs to check out what fuel ALL of the Dynomax Challenge finalists were running. The winner put down over 1600hp!
Old Jan 20, 2008 | 02:12 AM
  #23  
90 Z28SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,801
From: South Bend , IN
Originally Posted by Eric Bryant
FWIW, if I could find E85 locally, I'd love to run it through my high-compression (11.7:1) 396 and see how it does.
My Cobalt is making the switch to E85 fuel this spring , all I really need to do is run a bigger injector and seriously re-work my fuel maps . It consumes about 30% more fuel at light loads and about 50% more at WOT ....it is pretty attainable around these parts .



Outside of using as a performance tool like the Saab and Lincoln engines or somone like me using as cheap race gas , I just dont see the draw of flex fuel vehicle . If say , u had a e-flex Impala or whatever , why would u want to fill up with E85 ? Its about as expensive as regular fuel and since it takes more energy to burn your mileage is less .

Last edited by 90 Z28SS; Jan 20, 2008 at 02:15 AM.
Old Jan 20, 2008 | 09:34 AM
  #24  
toneloc12345's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 586
From: OHIO
E85 is about 50 cents cheaper around these parts.
Old Jan 20, 2008 | 09:44 AM
  #25  
Jim the Nomad's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 215
From: ********.com
Originally Posted by 90 Z28SS
Outside of using as a performance tool like the Saab and Lincoln engines or somone like me using as cheap race gas , I just dont see the draw of flex fuel vehicle . If say , u had a e-flex Impala or whatever , why would u want to fill up with E85 ? Its about as expensive as regular fuel and since it takes more energy to burn your mileage is less .

I think I remember reading somewhere that a flex-fuel car gets artificially inflated MPG when if comes to CAFE regulations... consumers were never really expected to do a mass switch to ethanol, if I'm understanding this correctly.


I hadn't thought of the turbocharging and boost controller stuff as a flex-fuel solution... that might make an interesting project for when I'm no longer a poor college student, although I'm sure something that simple would have been hit on by the auto industry by now...
Old Jan 20, 2008 | 09:55 AM
  #26  
FUTURE_OF_GM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 632
From: NC
Under the new CAFE flexfuel vehicles will not get extra credits (Unfortunately)

I think it's BS.
Old Jan 20, 2008 | 05:53 PM
  #27  
90 Z28SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,801
From: South Bend , IN
Originally Posted by Jim the Nomad
although I'm sure something that simple would have been hit on by the auto industry by now...
Yea , but no reason to release something like this when E85 is pretty much unattainable in several markets .
Old Jan 21, 2008 | 02:53 PM
  #28  
detltu's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 658
From: Madisonville, Louisiana
http://www.ethanol.org/news/index.php?newsid=25

Kind of cool article but should definately be taken with a grain of salt or grain or whatever. They (the American coalition for ethanol, the people who are releasing the info and definately a biased group) found that E20 to E30 may actually be more efficient than regular gasoline. This + more efficient ways of producing ethanol could make it a strong alternative to pure gasoline.
Old Jan 21, 2008 | 08:44 PM
  #29  
bossco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,977
From: SeVa
Diesel fuel 128,450 BTU(LHV) per gallon
Gasoline 116,090 BTU(LHV) per gallon
LPG 84,950 BTU(LHV) per gallon
Natural gas 983 BTU(LHV) per cubic ft.
Electricity 3,412 BTU(LHV) per kwh
Coal 9,773 BTU(LHV) per pound
Ethanol 76,330 BTU(LHV) per gallon

For comparison
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 06:09 PM
  #30  
bossco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,977
From: SeVa
or a crap ton of compression in N/A form.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nayr
LT1 Based Engine Tech
7
Mar 3, 2023 08:34 PM
Jeff1904
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
5
Jun 5, 2016 05:00 PM
93 RedBird
Fuel and Ignition
4
Nov 15, 2015 08:24 AM
WobblySausage
Drivetrain
4
Oct 7, 2015 10:09 AM
Matt Dreessen
Fuel and Ignition
1
Sep 9, 2015 09:58 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:28 PM.