Here we go again...A new 5th gen drawing
#1
Here we go again...A new 5th gen drawing
Ok, heres a new drawing I did.
Ill be the first to say (before I get slammed) that its very rough and slightly mishapen. Just pay attention to the general "feel" of it, and tell me if you like the vibes you get.
http://www.designerspace.com/cars-l/...0712134903.jpg
------------------
---Ted Krygier-->
TED ONLINE
Ill be the first to say (before I get slammed) that its very rough and slightly mishapen. Just pay attention to the general "feel" of it, and tell me if you like the vibes you get.
http://www.designerspace.com/cars-l/...0712134903.jpg
------------------
---Ted Krygier-->
TED ONLINE
#4
TED I like it myself but it has a very edgy aggressive look. And I think one of the problems with the current 4th gen F-car is they are too aggressivly styled. IF GM designs a new Camaro I would imagine it would look more tame than the current car.
------------------
2002 Z28 white/neutral A4 3.23
13.33 @ 104.7 - 650 miles
286rwhp/311rwtq - 1300 miles
STOCK for now!
Gone but not forgotten,
1999 Silver SS 6M #3956
1997 Black Z28 A4 3.23
------------------
Ryan S.
------------------
2002 Z28 white/neutral A4 3.23
13.33 @ 104.7 - 650 miles
286rwhp/311rwtq - 1300 miles
STOCK for now!
Gone but not forgotten,
1999 Silver SS 6M #3956
1997 Black Z28 A4 3.23
------------------
Ryan S.
#5
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by 99SilverSS:
TED I like it myself but it has a very edgy aggressive look. And I think one of the problems with the current 4th gen F-car is they are too aggressivly styled. IF GM designs a new Camaro I would imagine it would look more tame than the current car.
</font>
TED I like it myself but it has a very edgy aggressive look. And I think one of the problems with the current 4th gen F-car is they are too aggressivly styled. IF GM designs a new Camaro I would imagine it would look more tame than the current car.
</font>
I hope the next Camaro stands out in a crowd.
Hopefully they will view the Camaro as a reasonably priced niche vehicle as described in Ruess's speech... this way they won't have to appeal to everyone to meet their sales projections.
[This message has been edited by Darth Xed (edited July 12, 2002).]
#6
Its obviously exaggerated, and that's OK. I can actually imagine a car with similar lines coming from a Sigma chassis.
------------------
Owner, Nashville Speed & Performance
1996 Trans Am WS6
------------------
Owner, Nashville Speed & Performance
1996 Trans Am WS6
#8
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by 99SilverSS:
TED I like it myself but it has a very edgy aggressive look. And I think one of the problems with the current 4th gen F-car is they are too aggressivly styled. IF GM designs a new Camaro I would imagine it would look more tame than the current car.
</font>
TED I like it myself but it has a very edgy aggressive look. And I think one of the problems with the current 4th gen F-car is they are too aggressivly styled. IF GM designs a new Camaro I would imagine it would look more tame than the current car.
</font>
I like Ted's drawing, although I would change the front a bit. First, I know you're paying homage to earlier Camaros with your headlights, but I personally don't go for the 'retro' look. Evolving the character of a car is good (2nd gen to 3rd gen is a perfect example, very well executed), but you still need to move forward. Also, I would eliminate the 'dip' in the middle of the grille-- it looks like it's grinning or something, and takes away from the natural flow of the lines.
Man, I wish I could draw like you .
------------------
2000 Z28, Arctic White, Ebony leather, A4, 2.73, RS-A, 13.3 @ 105.9 stock
#12
abdefghijkmopqrtuwxyz
P1eaze forgibe my zpe11ig. My keyboard haz krapped out, & I habe ha1f a dozem dead keyz.
AWEZOME dezigm, obera11. Yeah, itz a 1it11e miz-proportiomed, & the detai1z kou1d uze zome tweakimg, but the "fee1" of the kar iz great.
I uze your ko11age of Kamaro drawigz az wa11paper. I wizh Bob 1utz wou1d hire you.
P1eaze forgibe my zpe11ig. My keyboard haz krapped out, & I habe ha1f a dozem dead keyz.
AWEZOME dezigm, obera11. Yeah, itz a 1it11e miz-proportiomed, & the detai1z kou1d uze zome tweakimg, but the "fee1" of the kar iz great.
I uze your ko11age of Kamaro drawigz az wa11paper. I wizh Bob 1utz wou1d hire you.
#13
I agree with things said by R377. I too want it to be a car that constantly gets looks lik ethe previous Gens. Use cues from all Gens but alot of new design also. I think the shape of the car pretty good, but I don't really like anything else.
[This message has been edited by IZ28 (edited July 13, 2002).]
[This message has been edited by IZ28 (edited July 13, 2002).]
#14
I like it, Ted. Particularly the fenders and rear quaters. It definitely adds some "muscular" look into the drawing ...
------------------
'99 SS #4414, 6-Spd, T-tops
B&M Ripper, SLP Shift ****, BMR STB PHR, GW SFCs
TA Diff Cover, MacEwen Overlays w/TransAm Bezel
------------------
'99 SS #4414, 6-Spd, T-tops
B&M Ripper, SLP Shift ****, BMR STB PHR, GW SFCs
TA Diff Cover, MacEwen Overlays w/TransAm Bezel
#15
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by R377:
I disagree-- I think the current Camaro looks to soft and aerodynamic, whereas the Mustang has a nice, aggressive look to it. And we don't need to be reminded how the sales war ended up.
</font>
I disagree-- I think the current Camaro looks to soft and aerodynamic, whereas the Mustang has a nice, aggressive look to it. And we don't need to be reminded how the sales war ended up.
</font>