Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Henderson: New GM to be faster with decisions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 18, 2009 | 01:58 PM
  #1  
95redLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,505
From: Charleston, WV
Henderson: New GM to be faster with decisions

General Motors has often been criticized for being a slow and overly bureaucratic, but GM CEO Fritz Henderson says the new General Motors will be much more nimble and quicker to make decisions. The new GM could emerge from bankruptcy by August.

Henderson says the automaker is focusing on its restructuring its business, but is also working to reorganize the company so decisions can be made faster. “As part of the General Motors moving forward, you don’t normally think of us as speedy or fast, and that’s what we should be,” Henderson told Automotive News. “But when you’re fast you do make mistakes. My view is if you’re slow, you make more mistakes. You just don’t notice it.”

To help reduce the amount of internal red tape, GM is planning to cut its global management team by about 34 percent. That move should help to get ideas to the top much quicker.

GM was most recently criticized for being slow to react when gas topped $4 a gallon last summer. Whereas fuel efficient vehicles like the Honda Civic smashed sales records, most GM dealers were saddled with fuel-thirsty SUVs and trucks and little in the way of fuel efficient vehicles.

GM is also working on several other measures to change the culture at GM, but Henderson failed to elaborate on those. “That will be a discussion with you on a different day,” he said.

If all goes according to plan, GM is hopeful it can emerge from Chapter 11 protection by early August.
http://www.leftlanenews.com/henderso...decisions.html
Old Jun 18, 2009 | 02:00 PM
  #2  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Good! I hope this is more than just talk.
Old Jun 18, 2009 | 02:21 PM
  #3  
95redLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,505
From: Charleston, WV
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
Good! I hope this is more than just talk.
I think the first quote I put in bold hit the nail on the head for the old GM
My view is if you’re slow, you make more mistakes. You just don’t notice it.”
Old Jun 18, 2009 | 05:40 PM
  #4  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Sure hope so.
Old Jun 18, 2009 | 05:41 PM
  #5  
Ed 2001 SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 499
From: Miami, Fl USA
Can someone point to which sales records were smashed when gas topped $4.00 per gallon? If I recall correctly, the entire industry suffered, not just GM.
Old Jun 18, 2009 | 08:53 PM
  #6  
95redLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,505
From: Charleston, WV
Originally Posted by Ed 2001 SS
Can someone point to which sales records were smashed when gas topped $4.00 per gallon? If I recall correctly, the entire industry suffered, not just GM.
Heres about Honda from May 2008 there is more at the link below...
TORRANCE, Calif., June 3 -- American Honda Motor Co., Inc., May sales of 167,997, up 11.3 percent on a daily-selling-rate basis(1), shattered the company's all-time sales record for any month as Civic sales reached 53,299, up 28.3 percent versus last May and surpassing the previous monthly record for any car in the lineup.

New all-time records set in May included (previous record in parentheses):

-- American Honda total vehicle sales of 167,997 (August 2007: 158,342)
-- American Honda total car sales of 114,796 (August 2002: 95,686)
-- Honda Division total vehicle sales of 153,104 (August 2007: 141,906)
-- Honda Division total car sales of 105,548 (August 2003: 84,390)
-- Honda Civic Sales of 53,299 (May 2007: 39,993)
-- Honda Civic Hybrid sales of 4,676 (May 2007: 4,520)
-- Honda Fit sales of 8,205 (March 2008: 6,835)
-- Acura TSX sales of 4,564 (April 2006: 3,911)
http://www.theautochannel.com/news/2...03/088826.html
Old Jun 18, 2009 | 09:12 PM
  #7  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
$4+ gas is great for 35mpg+ cars. $2 is great for trucks. A good company needs to be able to make money in both. Ford is lining its self up to do just that, from the Fusion hybrid and Fiesta to the F-150 Raptor and GT500.

Come 2011 GM should be in a similar position with the Volt, Cruze and Spark out.
Old Jun 18, 2009 | 10:22 PM
  #8  
formula79's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,698
From: USA
GM was most recently criticized for being slow to react when gas topped $4 a gallon last summer. Whereas fuel efficient vehicles like the Honda Civic smashed sales records, most GM dealers were saddled with fuel-thirsty SUVs and trucks and little in the way of fuel efficient vehicles.
This part is silly. GM sells plenty of small cars like Cobalt, HHR, and Astra. The problem is, when people go to buy something small and fuel efficiant..they don't think GM. While it is a problem that needs to be fixed....GM's management cannot flip a switch and fix it in 6 months. They could not last year, and will not be able to now.
Old Jun 19, 2009 | 02:56 AM
  #9  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Originally Posted by Ed 2001 SS
Can someone point to which sales records were smashed when gas topped $4.00 per gallon? If I recall correctly, the entire industry suffered, not just GM.
Sales records during $4 per gallon gas?

Malibu sales were up 129% retail & 73% overall, Chrysler Town & Country sales were up 24%, Viper sales were up 19%, Escape sales were up 17%, Focus was up 23%, Volvo C70 sales jumped 57.7%, Cobalt sales were up about 22%, CTS sales climbed 16%, STS sales were up 12%, Vibe was up 23%, Auras were up 26% and Sky was up 44%.

July 2008, Mitsubishi was down 6.8%.

Honda was down 8%

Mazda was down 13%

Ford's sales were down 15%.

Toyota was down 17%.

GM was down 27%.

Volkswagen, Subaru, and Kia were all up, 4, 5, & 5% respectively.

BMW and Audi were up 2 & 4.5% respectively.

Nissan was up 10%.

Daimler was up 25%

No, the entire industry didn't suffer.... not nearly as bad as GM.

The only company that was worse than... let along anywhere nearly as bad as... GM was Chrysler, which saw sales drop 29%.


The entire industry wasn't impacted until last fall when the recession (not fuel prices) dominated the market.

GM and Chrysler took a bloodbath at $4 per gallon.

Both GM and Chrysler were dependent on large trucks and SUVs.

GM and Chrysler ended up in bankruptcy court.
Old Jun 19, 2009 | 09:54 AM
  #10  
mzgp5x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,174
From: MI
Sorry, I worked there. Salary Eng between union and mgt. It's all talk. BS. The level(s) of gm mamgement was astounding. I was on the floor & design of automation for vehicle launch install/ start-up/ production runs. Levels of mgt organization has not changed (even today). Most of mgt does not know cars or how to build them efficently. They have made progress on vehicle design since the Aztek, but, I did like the Aztek (better than the hondo-toyota box). B.
Old Jun 19, 2009 | 09:59 AM
  #11  
95redLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,505
From: Charleston, WV
Henderson's strategy to fix GM....

More to this....good read!
With the Obama Administration pressuring for quick results, the CEO's first job is to remake a bureaucracy notoriously resistant to change

The clock is ticking for Frederick A. "Fritz" Henderson. Tapped by the Treasury Dept. to run General Motors after the feds fired his old boss, Rick Wagoner, CEO Henderson understands that he needs to take a wrecking ball to the automaker's rigid culture or he could be history, too. "I know I have to re-prove myself," he says.

Henderson, who joined GM in the 1980s as a financial analyst, vows he will make the company less bureaucratic and nimbler. But his government minders are determined to provide adult supervision. They have installed as chairman former AT&T (T) boss Edward E. Whitacre Jr., considered a pragmatic change agent by Treasury officials for his successful reign at the telecom giant. And they're pushing Henderson to recruit other outsiders who can bring dramatic change to an organization that has long resisted it—and may still push back despite the near-death experience of bankruptcy.

Whitacre declined to discuss his new role, but Treasury officials say they are counting on him to help Henderson turn GM into a more consumer-focused company, much as Whitacre did at AT&T. Kent Kresa, who will be the interim chairman until GM emerges from bankruptcy and Whitacre takes over, says the former AT&T boss was so keen to fix GM that he volunteered for the job. "He's the kind of guy who will assess what's wrong, what should be done, and how we will get there," Kresa says. As chairman, Whitacre will stress-test Henderson's strategies and, says one Treasury official, help the CEO build the right management team.

The feds want Henderson and Whitacre to lure the kind of talent that will help GM reach consumers the way it did when legendary Chairman Alfred P. Sloan Jr. turned the company into one of the best carmakers in the world. Task force insiders say they don't want to pick who stays and who goes. But they have suggested that GM find new people who can help it get a quicker read on consumer tastes and build on the handful of recent hit models. "It's about Fritz and Ed picking a winning team," says an Administration official. "There will be a talent search."

Ditching Bottlenecks
In the meantime, Henderson is tackling GM's glacial decision-making process. A couple of four-hour meetings have been cut in half. Gone are the "premeetings," when the agenda for the real meeting was set. "I don't have time for that," Henderson says. Delegation, never GM's strong suit, is now an imperative. In early April, just after Treasury made him CEO, Henderson and several executives were discussing whether to add some pricey features to a future Buick model. Some wanted to save a few bucks while others figured they needed to step out and show consumers that the brand is truly upscale. After some debate, Henderson turned to Buick-GMC boss Susan Docherty. "You're the vice-president of Buick," Docherty recalls him saying. "Make the call." She opted to spend the money, and that was fine with the CEO. "Fritz is creating a culture where we don't need 17 meetings," Docherty says. "In the old GM, we would have to hear from everybody."

Last month, Henderson hired Booz & Co. consultant Jon R. Katzenbach to help make GM's middle managers less risk-averse and more willing to make decisions. Katzenbach and his team have begun scouring the company for mavericks adept at getting their ideas past a recalcitrant bureaucracy. Katzenbach asked each department chief to name five candidates. In most cases, he says, they aren't top managers or people on the fast track. Typically they have toiled at GM for a long time and know how to game the system. The plan is to make their attitudes and work habits the norm, not just a rarity among the few who will buck the system.
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine...mpaign_id=yhoo
Old Jun 19, 2009 | 10:05 AM
  #12  
95redLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,505
From: Charleston, WV
page 2...
Henderson may ditch one managerial bottleneck, a star chamber known as the Automotive Strategy Board. Its 16 members decide where money is spent, what strategy every business unit should take, and who gets promoted. Traditionally, the group has convened monthly. So if the automaker needed to make big calls like cutting checks for a new car or slashing production, those decisions languished until meeting time. GM insiders say Henderson may replace the strategy board with smaller teams that meet weekly and make decisions further down in the company.

Culture of Fear
Henderson has been careful not to criticize Wagoner. But he has begun dismantling some of his mentor's initiatives. Wagoner was a data geek who used nearly 10 metrics to measure his executives' performance. Not all were particularly relevant. Henderson says he has boiled those down to the five most vital for each department, with a much bigger emphasis on sales and profits. Under Wagoner, people were focused on minute details that meant more to their own departments than the overall company. "We got a little crazy with metrics," says Chris Oster, GM's organizational czar.

So far so good. But is Henderson willing to do what it takes? GM's new chief restructuring officer, Al Koch, previously advised the company as a consultant and has an outsider's perspective. "Fritz is more hands-on in enforcing decisions than Rick was," he says. But old habits endure. In a June 1 blog post to employees, Henderson asked for suggestions and criticism. Several workers said people are afraid of challenging the status quo. When pressed in an interview on the culture of fear, Henderson said he gets criticism all the time, and then added: "I've never had a situation where people were afraid to speak up." Maybe so, but that doesn't mean managers further down won't discourage new ideas from their underlings.

Henderson also says GM's product planning group is just fine. Yet it has routinely missed major trends and rarely sets them. GM's top-selling Chevrolet division, for example, is just this year launching decent crossover SUVs; rivals have been selling them for years. Plus, the product planners' indecisiveness has led to many delays on new programs. It's not that GM's designers and engineers can't work fast. They often wait for the "numbers dummies," as GM product adviser Robert A. Lutz calls them, to hash over the research. By the time the green light comes on, GM has missed the moment.

Fixing that is one of Henderson's biggest tasks. Lutz, the company's maverick-in-chief, is scheduled to retire at yearend. He's the one who did an end run around or bulldozed over the bureaucracy, says James N. Hall, principal of 2953 Analytics, a Detroit-area consulting firm. But Lutz never created a formal system that will replace his product savvy when he retires. That, say GM insiders, is why Lutz may stay on past his Dec. 31 departure date.

Either way, Henderson will have to make the product planning group— GM's most vital department—work faster and read the market better. He'll also have to prove wrong the critics who think GM needs not a company man as CEO but an outsider like Ford's (F) Alan R. Mulally. Right now it's fair to say that Henderson is moving faster than his predecessor, the incrementalist Wagoner. For the foreseeable future, his fate will rest in the hands of government minders who expect dramatic results—and quickly.
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine...880_page_2.htm
Old Jun 19, 2009 | 06:03 PM
  #13  
flowmotion's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,502
Originally Posted by formula79
This part is silly. GM sells plenty of small cars like Cobalt, HHR, and Astra. The problem is, when people go to buy something small and fuel efficiant..they don't think GM. While it is a problem that needs to be fixed....GM's management cannot flip a switch and fix it in 6 months. They could not last year, and will not be able to now.
There were some silly things that were close to "flipping a switch". For example, you previously couldn't buy a top-level trim Malibu/Aura with an I-4 engine. GM finally offered this option and it was a huge retail hit.
Old Jun 19, 2009 | 07:41 PM
  #14  
matLT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 957
From: Berkley, MI
Originally Posted by mzgp5x
Sorry, I worked there. Salary Eng between union and mgt. It's all talk. BS. The level(s) of gm mamgement was astounding. I was on the floor & design of automation for vehicle launch install/ start-up/ production runs. Levels of mgt organization has not changed (even today). Most of mgt does not know cars or how to build them efficently. They have made progress on vehicle design since the Aztek, but, I did like the Aztek (better than the hondo-toyota box). B.
But they are more than happy to tell you how to do it
Old Jun 20, 2009 | 01:41 PM
  #15  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Nice to see that someone else caught up to what I've been saying about GM almost since I joined this site:

It's not that GM's designers and engineers can't work fast. They often wait for the "numbers dummies," as GM product adviser Robert A. Lutz calls them, to hash over the research. By the time the green light comes on, GM has missed the moment.
I have said for years that the problem wasn't the people in the trenches doing the engineering and design. Every since at least 2003 when I had the chance to see how things were done at Holden, and by association General Motors (Holden's ability was actually less advanced than GM-North America!), and later by Bob Lutz's own claim that GM had the ability to get a new vehicle from idea to production in 18 months.... and the bulk of that involved suppliers developing parts that passed GM's certification. The catch was, as I also said , was that GM's decision making process took up to many years!

Also, GM's product approval process was set up to kill new projects. Either with data, or money, or nothing more than internal politics.

One glaring and inexcusable example of how all 3 work against a seemingly simply, logical, and virturally necessary item was on interiors. Bob Lutz had to fight tooth and nail, and faced endless resistence to using better materials and tighter fit in interiors. Finance resisted because it cost a few dollars more, and in their view spread out over hundreds of thousands of vehicles cheaper materials would save GM alot of money. Then there was the data guys who decided they had to study the subject of interiors to death, collecting analysis and actually coming up with an idea as to how cheap an interior a vehicle could be before it hurt sales. Then there were the people who simply didn't like Bob Lutz and decided to poke holes in his ideas for no or little other reason.... and he's a Vice Chairman!

Meanwhile, over at Ford, the CEO simply mandated better interiors, had accountants cost them out, and suddenly as new interiors came out, they were instantly better.

A brainless decision decided and done.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:30 PM.