GM's CEO Praises Obama, Calls on Gov't to Pump Up Gas, Income Taxes
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,398
From: Fairfax Station, VA. Formally Long Island :(
Interesting take on things.
http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=21839
http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=21839
"Republican" CEO admits taxpayers may lose $12B USD on bailout
It was almost two years ago this month that General Motors Comp. (GM) became the largest bankruptcy in U.S history and the largest nationalization. Taxpayer money was spent restructuring the company, removing unprofitable segments.
The approach worked. The company has since been profitable and enjoyed a successful initial public offering of stock. The only real issue for the company has been leadership turnover. The company has seen string of CEOs come and go -- Rick Wagoner, Fritz Henderson, and, most recently, Ed Whitacre.
I. GasTaxes++
The current CEO, Dan Akerson recently sounded off in an interview with The Detroit News, portions of which will likely offend some readers.
Most notably Mr. Akerson called for a massive gas tax hike in the U.S. commenting, "You know what I'd rather have them do — this will make my Republican friends puke — as gas is going to go down here now, we ought to just slap a 50-cent or a dollar tax on a gallon of gas. People will start buying more Cruzes and they will start buying less Suburbans."
Mr. Akerson argues a tax increase would be a better way to "protect the environment" and promote consumer fuel efficiency than direct increases the U.S. Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) regulations. The Obama administration and Congress are currently looking to extend increases in CAFE mandated fuel economy levels through 2025, with the current round of increases wrapping up in 2017.
GM currently is the only member of the U.S. "Big Three" to offer an electric vehicle. GM's Chevy Volt launched late last year and carries a $7,500 tax credit for buyers.
Mr. Akerson's comments echo those of a former senior advisor to President George W. Bush, who also advocates raising gas taxes as the only "practical" solution to escaping dependence on foreign oil.
Mr. Akerson suggested a tax of fifty cents on the dollar, which would make $4 USD/gallon gas cost $6 USD/gallon. This is slightly less than GM's previous suggestion to tax gas to $8 USD/gallon.
A Ford Motor Company (F) spokesperson refused to endorse the suggestion to raise fuel taxes, commenting, "[Ford] will leave the policy decision to Congress."
II. Akerson Praises Obama, Calls For More Taxes
The CEO, who bills himself as "a Colin Powell Republican — not a Sarah Palin Republican", praised U.S. President Barack Obama, stating he'd "done a pretty good job on the economy", which was a "nightmare" when he received it from former President George W. Bush.
Aside from gas taxes to incentivize buying fuel-efficient vehicles, Mr. Akerson also called for more taxes in general, stating, "Now, we need practical decisions. I think you need to cut the hell out of the budget and you've got to increase taxes … on everybody — including the middle class and the rich people."
He added that the U.S. government must increase the debt ceiling from $14.3T USD, a change that Congress has until Aug. 2 to think over. He states, "We're too good a nation to let ourselves be a banana republic" and calls the possibility of a government default "unimaginable."
Such a default could harm auto sales, he argues.
III. No More Government Motors?
During the interview Mr. Akerson said he though the U.S. government would soon divest its remaining stake in GM, commenting, "I actually think the government will be out this year — within the next 12 months, hopefully within the next six months."
"I have nothing but good things to say about them," Mr. Akerson says of his government "investors", but adds that the relationships is wearing on GM. He states, "It's kind of like your in-laws: It was a nice long weekend. We didn't say a week."
The U.S. Treasury Department once spent $49.5B USD to bail out GM and obtain a controlling 61 percent stake in the company. It offloaded much of that stake during the Nov. 2010 IPO. Mr. Akerson says a second PO could be incoming, commenting "[The Treasury] will likely look at another (stock) sale in August, after second-quarter earnings are announced."
His comments also hint that GM might buy back the stock directly, though he would only say "But we have a lot of cash."
If the U.S. gov't sold its stake now, it would have lost $12B USD in taxpayer money. But Mr. Akerson says that taxpayer sacrifice was worth it. He comments, "We are in the midst of transforming an iconic American company so 20 and 30 years from now (taxpayers) will look at this company and they'll say, 'Absolutely it was the right thing to do.' And it shouldn't be measured on did it sell for $43 or $53 (a share) or did they lose a couple billion dollars?"
Part of what is depressing tax prices is a 500 million-share stock PO, which has depressed prices of current shares 23 percent this year, down to $28.52 USD, well below the IPO price of $33 USD/share. Mr. Akerson admits, "I think that it is an overhang — to have 500 million shares sitting out there — it's a problem. They don't know when (the Treasury is) going to come out. Investors hate uncertainty."
IV. Akerson Says Taxpayer Loss Was Worth It
Despite the reality that taxpayers will likely lose quite a bit of money, Mr. Akerson infers that it's worth it and that taxpaying Americans are so "generous" they will surely be happy to foot the bill.
He compares GM to a disaster stricken region like New Orleans post hurricane Katrina, commenting, "We're the most generous country, even in terrible times. We don't walk to the disaster as a nation. … We can't wait to help."
According to Mr. Akerson, CBS's "Face the Nation" has invited him to be a guess, but complains he would be unable to go. He bemoans the hostility of "fellow" Republicans, stating, "I can't go on it. I'm toxic. I'm like a lightning rod. I couldn't have an intelligent discussion without someone saying, 'He's a welfare guy from the bailout.'"
Those Republicans don't realize the effects of a GM liquidation, he argues, stating, "If we had gone down, the supply chain would have gone down. … And Ford was hanging on by its fingernails, too."
He argues that taxpayers "took one of the team", so to speak, stating, "OK, we took the blow as a nation, we weathered the worst, and my God, we're back. It's why I came here. It was a story of underdog that tripped as we all have in our lives — it was a good feel-good story."
Mr. Akerson's interview will likely earn him some critics in Detroit, after he concluded, stating, "I have not seen a city in this bad a shape [Detroit] since I went to East Berlin in 1969."
It was almost two years ago this month that General Motors Comp. (GM) became the largest bankruptcy in U.S history and the largest nationalization. Taxpayer money was spent restructuring the company, removing unprofitable segments.
The approach worked. The company has since been profitable and enjoyed a successful initial public offering of stock. The only real issue for the company has been leadership turnover. The company has seen string of CEOs come and go -- Rick Wagoner, Fritz Henderson, and, most recently, Ed Whitacre.
I. GasTaxes++
The current CEO, Dan Akerson recently sounded off in an interview with The Detroit News, portions of which will likely offend some readers.
Most notably Mr. Akerson called for a massive gas tax hike in the U.S. commenting, "You know what I'd rather have them do — this will make my Republican friends puke — as gas is going to go down here now, we ought to just slap a 50-cent or a dollar tax on a gallon of gas. People will start buying more Cruzes and they will start buying less Suburbans."
Mr. Akerson argues a tax increase would be a better way to "protect the environment" and promote consumer fuel efficiency than direct increases the U.S. Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) regulations. The Obama administration and Congress are currently looking to extend increases in CAFE mandated fuel economy levels through 2025, with the current round of increases wrapping up in 2017.
GM currently is the only member of the U.S. "Big Three" to offer an electric vehicle. GM's Chevy Volt launched late last year and carries a $7,500 tax credit for buyers.
Mr. Akerson's comments echo those of a former senior advisor to President George W. Bush, who also advocates raising gas taxes as the only "practical" solution to escaping dependence on foreign oil.
Mr. Akerson suggested a tax of fifty cents on the dollar, which would make $4 USD/gallon gas cost $6 USD/gallon. This is slightly less than GM's previous suggestion to tax gas to $8 USD/gallon.
A Ford Motor Company (F) spokesperson refused to endorse the suggestion to raise fuel taxes, commenting, "[Ford] will leave the policy decision to Congress."
II. Akerson Praises Obama, Calls For More Taxes
The CEO, who bills himself as "a Colin Powell Republican — not a Sarah Palin Republican", praised U.S. President Barack Obama, stating he'd "done a pretty good job on the economy", which was a "nightmare" when he received it from former President George W. Bush.
Aside from gas taxes to incentivize buying fuel-efficient vehicles, Mr. Akerson also called for more taxes in general, stating, "Now, we need practical decisions. I think you need to cut the hell out of the budget and you've got to increase taxes … on everybody — including the middle class and the rich people."
He added that the U.S. government must increase the debt ceiling from $14.3T USD, a change that Congress has until Aug. 2 to think over. He states, "We're too good a nation to let ourselves be a banana republic" and calls the possibility of a government default "unimaginable."
Such a default could harm auto sales, he argues.
III. No More Government Motors?
During the interview Mr. Akerson said he though the U.S. government would soon divest its remaining stake in GM, commenting, "I actually think the government will be out this year — within the next 12 months, hopefully within the next six months."
"I have nothing but good things to say about them," Mr. Akerson says of his government "investors", but adds that the relationships is wearing on GM. He states, "It's kind of like your in-laws: It was a nice long weekend. We didn't say a week."
The U.S. Treasury Department once spent $49.5B USD to bail out GM and obtain a controlling 61 percent stake in the company. It offloaded much of that stake during the Nov. 2010 IPO. Mr. Akerson says a second PO could be incoming, commenting "[The Treasury] will likely look at another (stock) sale in August, after second-quarter earnings are announced."
His comments also hint that GM might buy back the stock directly, though he would only say "But we have a lot of cash."
If the U.S. gov't sold its stake now, it would have lost $12B USD in taxpayer money. But Mr. Akerson says that taxpayer sacrifice was worth it. He comments, "We are in the midst of transforming an iconic American company so 20 and 30 years from now (taxpayers) will look at this company and they'll say, 'Absolutely it was the right thing to do.' And it shouldn't be measured on did it sell for $43 or $53 (a share) or did they lose a couple billion dollars?"
Part of what is depressing tax prices is a 500 million-share stock PO, which has depressed prices of current shares 23 percent this year, down to $28.52 USD, well below the IPO price of $33 USD/share. Mr. Akerson admits, "I think that it is an overhang — to have 500 million shares sitting out there — it's a problem. They don't know when (the Treasury is) going to come out. Investors hate uncertainty."
IV. Akerson Says Taxpayer Loss Was Worth It
Despite the reality that taxpayers will likely lose quite a bit of money, Mr. Akerson infers that it's worth it and that taxpaying Americans are so "generous" they will surely be happy to foot the bill.
He compares GM to a disaster stricken region like New Orleans post hurricane Katrina, commenting, "We're the most generous country, even in terrible times. We don't walk to the disaster as a nation. … We can't wait to help."
According to Mr. Akerson, CBS's "Face the Nation" has invited him to be a guess, but complains he would be unable to go. He bemoans the hostility of "fellow" Republicans, stating, "I can't go on it. I'm toxic. I'm like a lightning rod. I couldn't have an intelligent discussion without someone saying, 'He's a welfare guy from the bailout.'"
Those Republicans don't realize the effects of a GM liquidation, he argues, stating, "If we had gone down, the supply chain would have gone down. … And Ford was hanging on by its fingernails, too."
He argues that taxpayers "took one of the team", so to speak, stating, "OK, we took the blow as a nation, we weathered the worst, and my God, we're back. It's why I came here. It was a story of underdog that tripped as we all have in our lives — it was a good feel-good story."
Mr. Akerson's interview will likely earn him some critics in Detroit, after he concluded, stating, "I have not seen a city in this bad a shape [Detroit] since I went to East Berlin in 1969."
Re: GM's CEO Praises Obama, Calls on Gov't to Pump Up Gas, Income Taxes
He just needs to keep his trap shut, much as Ford has done.
Anything the head of a company states about the tax payer taking $12 billion on the chin is going to come back to haunt the company. Moreover being a proponent of more tax. It's easy for Lt. Dan to state since he pays less of a percentage of his net income than middle class America does. And that $12 billion is still owed and will have to be funded by our kids or our kids kids. Unlike your brothers Dan at the Fed, we in the middle class have strict accounting that we have to abide by, when our bank accounts end up at $0, it's for real, we are not afforded the same hidden money distribution machine that is called the Fed that buys up treasuries leaving the ultimate bill to the US taxpayer that's in debit currently $14 trillion and growing every day.
If the tax increase would actually have benefit to our country I might consider it, but it will not. All we know how to do is create war Dan, that's all we've done for the last 40 years is create wars that haven't been declared by Congress. Unending war, with unending cost. This is all we spend money on. Seeing as your background comes from the infamous Carlyle group, I can understand where your elitist, create conflict, leave the responsibility and total liability up to the middle class American tax payer mentality sources.
Just zip it Danno, your much better off that way.
Anything the head of a company states about the tax payer taking $12 billion on the chin is going to come back to haunt the company. Moreover being a proponent of more tax. It's easy for Lt. Dan to state since he pays less of a percentage of his net income than middle class America does. And that $12 billion is still owed and will have to be funded by our kids or our kids kids. Unlike your brothers Dan at the Fed, we in the middle class have strict accounting that we have to abide by, when our bank accounts end up at $0, it's for real, we are not afforded the same hidden money distribution machine that is called the Fed that buys up treasuries leaving the ultimate bill to the US taxpayer that's in debit currently $14 trillion and growing every day.
If the tax increase would actually have benefit to our country I might consider it, but it will not. All we know how to do is create war Dan, that's all we've done for the last 40 years is create wars that haven't been declared by Congress. Unending war, with unending cost. This is all we spend money on. Seeing as your background comes from the infamous Carlyle group, I can understand where your elitist, create conflict, leave the responsibility and total liability up to the middle class American tax payer mentality sources.
Just zip it Danno, your much better off that way.
Last edited by Derek M; Jun 7, 2011 at 03:45 PM.
Re: GM's CEO Praises Obama, Calls on Gov't to Pump Up Gas, Income Taxes
I'm not even going to say what I think about this because it isn't appropriate. Who says Government Motors and politics didn't make bedfellows? 
I find it odd that while Akerson publicly seems to be in lockstep with the President and others in Washington, they are taking up the fight against the high CAFE standards along with the other automakers.

I find it odd that while Akerson publicly seems to be in lockstep with the President and others in Washington, they are taking up the fight against the high CAFE standards along with the other automakers.
Re: GM's CEO Praises Obama, Calls on Gov't to Pump Up Gas, Income Taxes
Sounds like someone could be not too happy with the sales of their golden child "Volt" and trying to drum up more sales for it.
Re: GM's CEO Praises Obama, Calls on Gov't to Pump Up Gas, Income Taxes
What a self serving jackass. Yeh lets raise all sorts of taxes, not just gas taxes. Do that and noone will be able to buy your cars. I have a good idea. Since he says GM has cash, how about giving that back to the tax payers.
Its quite obvious he only wants to tax gas even more so he can avoid the 62 mpg cafe that Obama wants. Maybe government motors really should be the new name. The whole thing sounds very shady to me.
Its quite obvious he only wants to tax gas even more so he can avoid the 62 mpg cafe that Obama wants. Maybe government motors really should be the new name. The whole thing sounds very shady to me.
Re: GM's CEO Praises Obama, Calls on Gov't to Pump Up Gas, Income Taxes
Always in the comments people bitching and complaining, but offering no better suggestions. Just keep spending more than we bring in cause they don't want to pay for it.
Gas tax is the best and most logical way to encourage people to buy small cars and get ourselves off foreign oil. My only complaint is that it should be phased in slowly.
Gas tax is the best and most logical way to encourage people to buy small cars and get ourselves off foreign oil. My only complaint is that it should be phased in slowly.
Re: GM's CEO Praises Obama, Calls on Gov't to Pump Up Gas, Income Taxes
Re: GM's CEO Praises Obama, Calls on Gov't to Pump Up Gas, Income Taxes
The current 18 cents a gallon tax isn't cutting it. We could use more money for road and bridge repair. The increased gas tax will cut consumption which will cut the trade deficit and keep a lot more of our money in the USA and out of the hands of OPEC.
They sell them as fast as they build them.
They sell them as fast as they build them.
Re: GM's CEO Praises Obama, Calls on Gov't to Pump Up Gas, Income Taxes
-Geoff
Re: GM's CEO Praises Obama, Calls on Gov't to Pump Up Gas, Income Taxes
Always in the comments people bitching and complaining, but offering no better suggestions. Just keep spending more than we bring in cause they don't want to pay for it.
Gas tax is the best and most logical way to encourage people to buy small cars and get ourselves off foreign oil. My only complaint is that it should be phased in slowly.
Gas tax is the best and most logical way to encourage people to buy small cars and get ourselves off foreign oil. My only complaint is that it should be phased in slowly.
And to be honest. The whole foreign oil thing is so overblown. I would argue China buying up all our debt is much more dangerous.


