Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

GM Fuel Economy Observation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 03:55 AM
  #31  
AdioSS's Avatar
West South Central Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,371
From: Kilgore TX 75662
Originally Posted by Silverado C-10
This is what I hate about the US... *if* GM did that, then the car would get ragged on by every magazine under the sun for being slow, lathargic, not fun to drive, etc... and some how, because it's not a foreign name plate, the "slowness" will get attributed to "low quality."
that's one of the good things about the 6 speed auto. It has the ability to have very steep low gears, but the high gears are good for the highway.
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 08:37 AM
  #32  
routesixtysixer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 669
From: Arcadia, OK
That's what is really frustrating about their choices. Stick a 6-speed auto behind the latest AFM 3.9 to achieve 35+ mpg (highway) in a full-size Impala and a powertrain that is significantly cheaper to build and would have above average performance. What's the downside?
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 09:28 AM
  #33  
DAKMOR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,406
From: Philaduhphia
The contracts for the 4speed autos...

The production capacity for the 6speed autos...

And strike after strike after strike by workers.
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 09:54 AM
  #34  
96_Camaro_B4C's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,650
From: Indianapolis, IN
Originally Posted by Eric Bryant
The nominal bore spacing is the same, but it's a different block (hell, the 3.9 even has offset bores), different heads, different crank... how many more new parts must an engine have to be considered "new"?
Gracias. That's what I thought.
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 11:53 AM
  #35  
mastrdrver's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,817
From: O-Town
Originally Posted by Eric Bryant
The nominal bore spacing is the same, but it's a different block (hell, the 3.9 even has offset bores), different heads, different crank... how many more new parts must an engine have to be considered "new"?
My beef wasn't with the new design, which just from the numbers and driving the two different engines, 3.4, 3.8 vs 3.5/3.9, tells me that there was a huge improvement for smoothness and power output. My problem is that they went and redesigned these new engines and they failed to fix the leaking gaskets that plagued the old GM V6s in the first place.

How you like to be told, when you get your oil changed at 50k, that your engine is leaking out of just about every gasket? I have yet to really see a Honda or Toyota, 4 or 6, have the abundance of problems that GM has with their V6s and 4spd autos leaking.
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 02:53 PM
  #36  
96_Camaro_B4C's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,650
From: Indianapolis, IN
Originally Posted by mastrdrver
My beef wasn't with the new design, which just from the numbers and driving the two different engines, 3.4, 3.8 vs 3.5/3.9, tells me that there was a huge improvement for smoothness and power output. My problem is that they went and redesigned these new engines and they failed to fix the leaking gaskets that plagued the old GM V6s in the first place.

How you like to be told, when you get your oil changed at 50k, that your engine is leaking out of just about every gasket? I have yet to really see a Honda or Toyota, 4 or 6, have the abundance of problems that GM has with their V6s and 4spd autos leaking.
How do you know they haven't come up with newer gasket designs and/or materials, even though the head/block/intake interface is still similar to the design of the old 3.4 (referring to the common intake manifold coolant leak that the 3.4L had)?

I've not heard anything about 3.4s having excessive oil leaks from other areas, if that is what you mean. But even if they did, it is quite possible that they have changed to different materials or designs of the gaskets where leaking was a problem...

Old Apr 17, 2008 | 06:21 PM
  #37  
mastrdrver's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,817
From: O-Town
Originally Posted by 96_Camaro_B4C
How do you know they haven't come up with newer gasket designs and/or materials, even though the head/block/intake interface is still similar to the design of the old 3.4 (referring to the common intake manifold coolant leak that the 3.4L had)?

I've not heard anything about 3.4s having excessive oil leaks from other areas, if that is what you mean. But even if they did, it is quite possible that they have changed to different materials or designs of the gaskets where leaking was a problem...

Of the two 3.5s I remember looking at intently and remember the mileage, they both had oil pans leaking. As noted the G6 had ~50k on it and was an 05/06. The Malibu was an 07 with only 7k on it and had the same problem! While the Malibus had just started, the G6 was quite excessive. The valve cover and intake gaskets do look like they will hold longer, the valve covers looked RTVed. Though, I do remember looking at one 3.5 at one point in time and seeing what looked like the intake end seals were starting to leak.

Lets make something clear, I think the new 3.5/3.9 are a big step forward in smoothness and power over the old GM v6s. My beef is that they did not fix the one thing that probably turned more people off of GM v6s than anything else, oil leaks. I know that the new Toyota 2.4 and older 1.5/1.6 Honda 4s have oil pans that do end up leaking, but all the Hondas I've seen all have over 100k on them and the Toyotas are actually quite easy to fix, from a labor stand point. Even the old Toyota 2.2s have problems with cam covers leaking, though it again is not a problem until over 100k. This is what I see at work, day in and day out, changing oil on cars for a living. In a college town you see a lot of small cars covering a lot of years.

Like I've said, I'm glad that GM is going to start only using the 3.6 and hopefully the 6spd auto will replace all the 4spds. I can only hope that GM has used better materials when it comes to gaskets this time around. I have reason to hope since all the Ecotec engines I have seen have not had a single problem with them when it comes to leaks. This is what a lot of people will call reliability problems when they are questioned about it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
3TAS4ME
LT1 Based Engine Tech
12
Apr 15, 2015 02:24 PM
CARiD
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Jan 27, 2015 06:27 AM
CARiD
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Dec 26, 2014 04:20 AM
JurisAg02
LS1 Based Engine Tech
8
Jul 27, 2002 11:49 AM
VetteThreat
LS1 Based Engine Tech
9
Jul 18, 2002 07:40 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:31 PM.