Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Getting better by getting smaller...when is it sucessful?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 16, 2008 | 09:45 PM
  #1  
formula79's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,698
From: USA
Getting better by getting smaller...when is it sucessful?

Everyone seems to think that the big 3 will get better by getting smaller. I am sure it has happened...but can anyone point out an actual sucess story where a company lopped itself smaller and ended up better long term? I mean all I have seen is as GM offers less models...they sell less cars....
Old Dec 16, 2008 | 11:09 PM
  #2  
FUTURE_OF_GM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 632
From: NC
It's not successful...

It's called surrendering.
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 01:46 AM
  #3  
5thgen69camaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,802
From: Annapolis MD
Originally Posted by formula79
Everyone seems to think that the big 3 will get better by getting smaller. I am sure it has happened...but can anyone point out an actual sucess story where a company lopped itself smaller and ended up better long term? I mean all I have seen is as GM offers less models...they sell less cars....
GE Jack Welch with its "Fix Sell or close" idea sold off its Air Conditioning to Trane, and cutting cost in its Appliances which up till that point was what people identified GE with. He turned the company around.

Last edited by 5thgen69camaro; Dec 17, 2008 at 01:53 AM.
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 02:16 AM
  #4  
Ryan's LT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 561
From: Ventura County, CA
Apple. Different industry, but same principle.
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 03:15 AM
  #5  
Dan Daly's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 167
From: USA
Originally Posted by 5thgen69camaro
GE Jack Welch with its "Fix Sell or close" idea sold off its Air Conditioning to Trane, and cutting cost in its Appliances which up till that point was what people identified GE with. He turned the company around.
Originally Posted by Ryan's LT1
Apple. Different industry, but same principle.
Damn, both of you took the first two responses that popped in my head. Home Depot is another example.
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 07:56 AM
  #6  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Kmart
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 08:09 AM
  #7  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
GM had great success when they downsized and elimiated Oldsmobile.......

oh wait...

they lost Corporate volume almost identical to the number of Olds sales, if I remember right....
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 09:22 AM
  #8  
Wild Willy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 439
From: upstate New York
Probably lost all the faithful Oldsmobile guys- Olds had a loyal following and a good reputation- other than when they put chevy engines in the Olds back in the late 70's, and took a beating for that-

The cutting in GE started before Nuetron Bomb Jack (leave the buildings, get rid of the people) I was laid off from GE in '81- and GE had dumped most of their small appliances and electric motor manufacturing by then- the inability of this country to build new power plants hurt GE, who was big in the steam turbine business for power generation. They continued to build gas-fired turbines, and jet engines- even had some defense contracts- but they are way down in manufacturing- They also got into finance, similar to what GM did with GMAC- I have wondered how that has affected both those companies now with the economic condtions-
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 10:16 AM
  #9  
nowandthen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 72
Egghead ---> Newegg
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 11:13 AM
  #10  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
I think the point would be to not sell fewer cars, but to sell the same number with fewer nameplates.
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 11:25 AM
  #11  
hey01's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 505
From: Jax,FL
wouldn't it be intersting if GM actually let each go and let them become their own car company like they were before GM started gobbling everyone up.
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 11:59 AM
  #12  
Dan Daly's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 167
From: USA
Originally Posted by hey01
wouldn't it be intersting if GM actually let each go and let them become their own car company like they were before GM started gobbling everyone up.
Now that WOULD be interesting. I'm not saying it's the best solution, but it should be entertaining along the way.
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 12:10 PM
  #13  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by Z284ever
I think the point would be to not sell fewer cars, but to sell the same number with fewer nameplates.

Idealy, yes, but I think the Oldsmobile situation proved that is not what happens.
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 12:41 PM
  #14  
Chuck!'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 2,610
From: Cincinnati, OH
Originally Posted by 5thgen69camaro
GE Jack Welch with its "Fix Sell or close" idea sold off its Air Conditioning to Trane, and cutting cost in its Appliances which up till that point was what people identified GE with. He turned the company around.
Which is why he'd be the perfect car czar.
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 01:14 PM
  #15  
Wild Willy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 439
From: upstate New York
I guess GM and GE are really just money-making corporations, with no real product loyalty- they will manufacture or sell whatever gives them the biggest profit- GM bought Fridgidare years ago- And you can still buy GE lightbulbs- just not made in this country any more- Is that is what's next- GM just becoming an importer of cars selling their 'brand' that is built overseas?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:18 PM.