Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Gas might be as high as $5.00 by the end of summer if oil stays at $125

Old May 15, 2008 | 12:35 PM
  #31  
FUTURE_OF_GM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 632
From: NC
Originally Posted by indieaz
People are going to take fewer trips, eat out less and buy fewer "luxury" items such as starbucks coffee in order to make up the difference. Basically the economy is going to suffere in order for us to keep sending money to foreign nations for oil so we can make it to work, so we can buy more gas to make it to work...and so on. This is why in my mind...even if i had to pay an equivalent $/mile for an alternative fuel source that was made 100% int he US I'd be fine with it.

People keep boohooing electric "well what it electric goes up?". Well, what if it does? Even if it goes up enough that it costs nearly as much to drive an electric vehicle wouldnt' you rather all yoru money go towards employing people in the US?

Too bad the food for oil argument will effectively kill those alternative sources.

And the greenies will never allow the electrical grid we need for electric cars.
Old May 15, 2008 | 12:36 PM
  #32  
Z28x's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by FUTURE_OF_GM
And the greenies will never allow the electrical grid we need for electric cars.
They are the ones pushing for electric and electric cars.... you sure you don't have them confused with the Amish?
Old May 15, 2008 | 12:39 PM
  #33  
FUTURE_OF_GM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 632
From: NC
Originally Posted by Z28x
They are the ones pushing for electric and electric cars.... you sure you don't have them confused with the Amish?
They are...

But at the same time, they are anti coal. And the ONLY way our economy/grid will support a massive switch will be through coal burning plants. Nuclear is nice, but it'll take YEARS to build those plants.

Wait and see... If (god forbid) we ever do switch to electric appliances as our primary means of conveyance, the bitching will be nonstop. You know, like the 20 years of bitching about CAFE and CO2
Old May 15, 2008 | 12:48 PM
  #34  
Z28x's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by FUTURE_OF_GM
They are...

But at the same time, they are anti coal. And the ONLY way our economy/grid will support a massive switch will be through coal burning plants. Nuclear is nice, but it'll take YEARS to build those plants.

Wait and see... If (god forbid) we ever do switch to electric appliances as our primary means of conveyance, the bitching will be nonstop. You know, like the 20 years of bitching about CAFE and CO2
They are pro wind and solar. Wind cost around the same as coal give or take a penny once you factor in all variables. Solar is expensive but when financed in with new construction it can be practical. Then of course no one seems to be talking about conservation. A kWh saved is as good as a new kWh created.
Old May 15, 2008 | 12:56 PM
  #35  
Tokuzumi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 602
From: Alpharetta, GA
Originally Posted by routesixtysixer
I'm curious to know what our "new elected leader" can do? The only plan of action I've heard from the politicians is raise taxes on the oil companies. Still trying to figure out how that will lower gas prices.
Corporations don't pay taxes. We pay the taxes for the corporations when we buy their product. On paper, it appears a business paid taxes, but they are not going to dip into their savings to pay higher taxes, and not pass some type of increase on to us. More taxes for oil companies = higher gas prices.
Old May 15, 2008 | 01:06 PM
  #36  
mdenz3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,173
Originally Posted by Z28x
Wind cost around the same as coal give or take a penny once you factor in all variables.
In NY when all the generators bid. Wind is the highest, coal is the lowest.
Old May 15, 2008 | 01:12 PM
  #37  
routesixtysixer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 669
From: Arcadia, OK
Originally Posted by mdenz3
In NY when all the generators bid. Wind is the highest, coal is the lowest.
Yes, but the cost of coal will increase over time. Wind is always free. When it's blowing, that is
Old May 15, 2008 | 02:16 PM
  #38  
Z28x's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by mdenz3
In NY when all the generators bid. Wind is the highest, coal is the lowest.
I was thinking from a new construction stand point. Plus there are hidden social cost to coal, like local health care increases from more people getting asthma and cancer. Acid rain, etc...
Old May 15, 2008 | 03:46 PM
  #39  
90 Z28SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,801
From: South Bend , IN
Originally Posted by Z28x
I bet if I put a gallon of E100 Ethanol in my riding mower I'll get a lot further than if I put a gallon in that horse
I would hope so , u put a gallon in that horse its just gonna lean it out so bad it would die where it stands
Old May 15, 2008 | 03:57 PM
  #40  
indieaz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 915
From: Tucson, AZ
Originally Posted by FUTURE_OF_GM
Too bad the food for oil argument will effectively kill those alternative sources.
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/...y/5781966.html

Old May 15, 2008 | 05:54 PM
  #41  
Derek M's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 538
Originally Posted by 97QuasarBlue3.8
Anyone wanna dig up some old gas threads from 2004?

I remember I was pissed because I had bought a 1997 S10 Blazer that got 17mpg. The price of gas rose to $2.14/gallon. $3/gallon gas was a BIG fear--I'd have to stop driving the thing if it got that high.
I can remember when I bought my truck fill ups were $38 to $42 on roughly a 32 gallon fill, 34 gallon tank.

Tank before last, filled up at a cost of $127. Sunday I gave big oil the finger, filled up on B100 Biodiesel. Still cost about the same, the bio was $.15 less a gallon, but there's some small justification in not buying their product.
Old May 15, 2008 | 06:07 PM
  #42  
Derek M's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 538
Originally Posted by indieaz
People keep boohooing electric "well what it electric goes up?". Well, what if it does? Even if it goes up enough that it costs nearly as much to drive an electric vehicle wouldnt' you rather all yoru money go towards employing people in the US?
That's a lost cause in this country, people have no want or desire for patriotism or pride in country. If you attempt to get in their way for buying cheap imported goods, get ready to be freight trained. Few really care what happens to their fellow Americans. Nor do they have a care in the world if jobs stay here, as long as me, my, I doesn't get affected, its carry on as usual.
Old May 16, 2008 | 07:21 AM
  #43  
Flip94ta's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 610
From: Akron, OH.
Originally Posted by Derek M
I can remember when I bought my truck fill ups were $38 to $42 on roughly a 32 gallon fill, 34 gallon tank.

Tank before last, filled up at a cost of $127. Sunday I gave big oil the finger, filled up on B100 Biodiesel. Still cost about the same, the bio was $.15 less a gallon, but there's some small justification in not buying their product.
Keep it up bro. I starting using B20 when I had a diesel USPS delivery truck. I thought I was kinda of pioneering it, come to find out the Postal Service had used 2.2 million gallons of bio in 2006 and planned on using 3+ million gallons in 2007. I left in 07 and I'm not sure how they are doing now but I really hope people start running more bio, especially truckers. Our biggest problem was a lack of pumps. There were only two pumps in the whole city. The Post Office did change over all the diesel in their onsite tanks to biodiesel. The 7-9 ton trucks and tractor trailers all used those tanks. I think its cool that all these USPS trucks are running around town on bio and no one knows about it, no bumper stickers, big ads, just doing the right thing when nobody's looking.
Soy prices aren't killing folks like the corn E85 issue.
Old May 17, 2008 | 07:03 PM
  #44  
mcsslover1987's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 158
From: Yreka CA
I think using any food for fuel is rediculous and E85 ethanol should be outlawed unless they can make it from some kind of waste. Just my .02
Old May 18, 2008 | 01:16 AM
  #45  
FUTURE_OF_GM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 632
From: NC
Originally Posted by Z28x
They are pro wind and solar. Wind cost around the same as coal give or take a penny once you factor in all variables. Solar is expensive but when financed in with new construction it can be practical. Then of course no one seems to be talking about conservation. A kWh saved is as good as a new kWh created.
Solar is a joke.

My GF is an architect, solar is not cost effective at all in that field much less for mass.

That's a lost cause in this country, people have no want or desire for patriotism or pride in country. If you attempt to get in their way for buying cheap imported goods, get ready to be freight trained. Few really care what happens to their fellow Americans. Nor do they have a care in the world if jobs stay here, as long as me, my, I doesn't get affected, its carry on as usual.
True that.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:00 AM.