Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

G8 test drrive....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 04:54 PM
  #16  
R377's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,712
From: Ontario
Originally Posted by Z284ever
Also, the G8 concept looked so badass with it's more agressive wheels/tires/stance, but when I see a photo of a regular production G8, I just think....ehh.
Actually I'm the opposite. Manufacturer's studio teaser pics always seem a little cold to me since every nuance of lighting and angles is calculated to the nth degree. You kinda get the feeling you're not seeing how the car will *really* look. But the pic of the black car in that article shows some nice lines under natural lighting, and I think gives you a better idea of how it will look in the real world. It looks pretty darn good to me and I can't wait to see one in person.
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 10:16 PM
  #17  
crYnOid's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 384
From: Australia
Originally Posted by poSSum
Sure hope that was a misstatement.
Nope it isn't. My VE has bad wheel hop (in the wet) from the driver side rear wheel, but none from the passenger side rear! A tuner in aus explored this issue and tried everything with all the bushes in the IRS (including replacing the bushes with custom made metal bushes!) and was not able to cure it with bushes. He found that replacing the standard spring/shock with a good aftermarket spring/shock combo almost completely fixed the issue.

This seems to be what I have found with my car. After complaining to the dealer, all they did was tell me my tyre pressures were to high then dropped them way to low (didn't fix the issue either...). I took my car to the local pedders and they put it on their shock testing machine. While the front 2 shocks were identical the rear 2 weren't. The driver side rear (the one that has the wheel hop) was found to be softer than the other rear shock. Pedders didn't believe it would be outside of the 'manufacturing tolerances' of the OEM shock (but it was getting close to their tolerance), so it looks like I just got unlucky.

On the VE it is all about getting the shock to control the wheel and spring, and my softer shock isn't capable of doing that

On wheels, anything less than 19" looks small, simple as that!! There is a reason you can order 20" wheels from the factory on every VE model 18" wheels should be the bare minimum on the VE! 22" are not uncommon (aftermarket)

18" = meh
19" = good
20" = nice

The G8 concept had 20" HSV wheels. They are easy to get confused with 19" as HSV sells the concept wheels in both 19" and 20".

BTW, if your looking to buy the concept wheels you had better have a thick wallet. Expect US$3000 minimum (!!!!) for a set.
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 01:31 AM
  #18  
formula79's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,698
From: USA
Originally Posted by Z284ever
Yeah, I know what you mean.
So all those times GM let enthusists from this board drive the concept Camaro and post what they thought is meaningless also?

For me, the G8 is a GTO with all the negatives fixed, like back seats I can get in and a usable trunk. I think many GTO owners (including myself) will be seriously looking at one of these. I also suspect that many of the people who passed on the GTO because they need a car with a usable trunk, and backseat (there were a lot of them) will be all over this car. What will be interesting will be how the traditional Gran Prix buyers adapt to this car and RWD. Chicago was the Grand Prix biggest maket...and I can't see many current GP owners there going for RWD in the snow.

The biggest disappointments in this car I see so far are XM or and touchscreen stereo without the nav. I also do not like any of the current wheels offered.
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 01:38 AM
  #19  
formula79's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,698
From: USA
Also the car in the top picture is a V6 car if you go by the wheels, which is why it looks so homely.
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 01:58 AM
  #20  
crYnOid's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 384
From: Australia
I thought I should add a pic of 22" wheels on a VE. They aren't very good 22" but I can't help that :P This car is also lowered and those wheels make the HSV brakes look small!

Old Jan 1, 2008 | 11:05 AM
  #21  
97z28/m6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,597
From: oshawa,ontario,canada
^that looks nasty.
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 12:50 PM
  #22  
OutsiderIROC-Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,688
From: Middle of Kansas
Originally Posted by 97z28/m6
i love it. only wish they'd make a 2dr one.
+1....
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 02:05 PM
  #23  
5thgen69camaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,802
From: Annapolis MD
Originally Posted by formula79
So all those times GM let enthusists from this board drive the concept Camaro and post what they thought is meaningless also?

For me, the G8 is a GTO with all the negatives fixed, like back seats I can get in and a usable trunk. I think many GTO owners (including myself) will be seriously looking at one of these. I also suspect that many of the people who passed on the GTO because they need a car with a usable trunk, and backseat (there were a lot of them) will be all over this car. What will be interesting will be how the traditional Gran Prix buyers adapt to this car and RWD. Chicago was the Grand Prix biggest maket...and I can't see many current GP owners there going for RWD in the snow.

The biggest disappointments in this car I see so far are XM or and touchscreen stereo without the nav. I also do not like any of the current wheels offered.
Good post!
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 02:27 PM
  #24  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by formula79
So all those times GM let enthusists from this board drive the concept Camaro and post what they thought is meaningless also?

For me, the G8 is a GTO with all the negatives fixed, like back seats I can get in and a usable trunk. I think many GTO owners (including myself) will be seriously looking at one of these. I also suspect that many of the people who passed on the GTO because they need a car with a usable trunk, and backseat (there were a lot of them) will be all over this car. What will be interesting will be how the traditional Gran Prix buyers adapt to this car and RWD. Chicago was the Grand Prix biggest maket...and I can't see many current GP owners there going for RWD in the snow.

The biggest disappointments in this car I see so far are XM or and touchscreen stereo without the nav. I also do not like any of the current wheels offered.

No, I didn't say it was meaningless. The G8 is a real car. Just saying that an unbiased review would probably be more interesting. As far as using the Camaro Concept as an example, I don't know where you're going with that. Although interesting to read, those concept test drive reports had about ZERO to do with what a production car driving experience might be like.

With all that said, I'd consider a G8 over a GTO any day - that is, for my specific needs. I'd need an M6 though, or "no sale".

Last edited by Z284ever; Jan 1, 2008 at 03:03 PM.
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 02:51 PM
  #25  
Threxx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 4,320
From: Memphis
Originally Posted by formula79
So all those times GM let enthusists from this board drive the concept Camaro and post what they thought is meaningless also?
Since you directed this at somebody who was agreeing with my comment I'll clarify what I'm surprised isn't already obvious.

The review isn't meaningless - it's just that anyone with half a brain is going to take this positive review with a grain of salt.

A review doesn't have to be unbiased to have some good feedback in it, and just because a review has good feedback in it doesn't mean it is at all unbiased.

Last edited by Threxx; Jan 1, 2008 at 02:54 PM.
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 06:01 PM
  #26  
graham's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,887
From: northeast Miss.
When will it have a manual transmission?
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 06:23 PM
  #27  
Dragoneye's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 801
From: New York
.......later.

All I've heard is that it won't be launched with one.
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 10:56 PM
  #28  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by graham
When will it have a manual transmission?
I'm getting the feeling - never.
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 11:32 PM
  #29  
graham's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,887
From: northeast Miss.
Simply ridiculous...
Old Jan 2, 2008 | 10:16 AM
  #30  
Geoff Chadwick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,154
From: All around
Originally Posted by 2001Firehawk
http://www.g8board.com/08G8/It does have AFM (Active Fuel Management). There is no light or notice when you are in "V4" mode - in fact I could not tell at all. It is rated for an estimated 15 city 24 hwy economy.
The 300C is rated 15/23 for the V8 RWD and 15/22 for the V8 AWD. 18/26 for the V6.

The FWD Impala V8 is rated at 16/24 and the V6 18/28.

Call me crazy - but I think GM will skip on putting the V6 diesel in the G8.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:57 PM.