Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

This Forums FAQ's...

Old Sep 3, 2003 | 10:58 PM
  #1  
Demon_Cleaner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 71
From: Long Beach, CA
This Forums FAQ's...

I noticed that there are MANY misconceptions regarding the decisions GM made to axe the Camaro. I also noticed a large number of new members asking the future of the Fbodies in this forum.

I think we should create a FAQ's sticky next to the sticky about the concept Camaro. In it, we should include the decisions/theories of why GM decided to hiatus the Fbody, what we know now, and what we can we expect in the near future. It should answer most questions/misconceptions people seem to have in this forum, as well as others.
Old Sep 4, 2003 | 08:45 PM
  #2  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
What role did the windshield play in the F-body's demise?


The "A" pillar's close proximity to the front passenger's heads would have mandated a redesign of those pillars or the inclusion of air-curtains in the F-body for the 2003 model year.

Why didn't either one happen?

The "A" pillar is already thick. The addition of air curtains in the pillar would have made them unacceptibly thicker. Curtains based just above the side windows would have not only ended the T-tops, but would have affected entry-exit ease (already dicey with taller people).

Redesigning the "A" pillar would have meant redesigning the greenhouse, either by moving the "A" pillar away from the heads of the front seat passengers, or by raising the roof to allow installation of side air curtains. 2 very serious issues there:

1. Redesigning the roof without redoing the rest of the cars proportions would have made the F-body look pretty odd (sleek car/ tall greenhouse).
2. Redesigning just the roof would have been expensive enough to simply go the rest of the way & design a whole new structure (remember, GM didn't even want to initially pay for the 1998's new nose, till it turned out to be necessary for the LS1).

Why didn't they do a new structure then?

Too expensive. To make Camaro worthwhile, it HAS to share most if not all of it's structure with another car or sell in large volume. GM had no other RWD structure to use, and Camaro isn't going to sell in massive volumes on it's own (say 2-300,000 as a likely guess), so just this alone was enough to shut them down. There are a laundry list of other reasons, but this is just one area.
Old Sep 5, 2003 | 04:20 AM
  #3  
IZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,647
From: At car shows and cruise nights!
We tried to get a few informative posts regarding the 5th Gen and why the Camaro is on hiatus put as a FAQ on the top of this page but no1 ever did anything about it.
Old Sep 5, 2003 | 03:34 PM
  #4  
R377's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,712
From: Ontario
Unfortunately, we already saw how many people pay attention to "stickies" when we tried to prevent the endless threads on that Camaro concept.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CARiD
2010 - 2015 Camaro Interior, Exterior, Paint & Body, Electronics/Car Audio
0
Jul 7, 2015 08:19 AM
KYWes
Site Help and Suggestions
4
Apr 25, 2015 09:12 AM
willie-d-nice
Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes
1
Feb 13, 2015 06:40 AM
DropZ
Site Help and Suggestions
3
Jan 15, 2015 10:40 AM
JasonD
Site Help and Suggestions
9
Jul 15, 2002 02:17 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:39 PM.