Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Ford's 6.7-Liter "Scorpion" Power Stroke Turbocharged V8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 31, 2009 | 04:06 PM
  #1  
ImportedRoomate's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,647
From: Jupiter, FL
Ford's 6.7-Liter "Scorpion" Power Stroke Turbocharged V8

http://jalopnik.com/5349202/fords-67...yline=true&s=i

This is it. The 6.7-liter "Scorpion" Power Stroke V8 is Ford's first diesel motor for its 2011 F-Series HD pickups to be developed entirely in-house after three decades partnering with outside engine-maker Navistar.


No power specs yet. They also went with the reversed intake/exhaust. Well actually I guess they're the first since theirs is actually making it to the market.
Old Aug 31, 2009 | 04:11 PM
  #2  
rlchv70's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 681
Not very elegant if you ask me. Compare to this, Navistar's 2010 V8, the engine Ford coulda had:

http://www.maxxforce.com/Content/pdf...MaxxForce7.pdf
Old Aug 31, 2009 | 04:20 PM
  #3  
ImportedRoomate's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,647
From: Jupiter, FL
Well looks don't mean much when it comes to the power plant. We'll see how reliable Ford's is compared to Navistar's previous attempt.

More pics:
http://jalopnik.com/5349413/fords-sc...color/gallery/
Old Aug 31, 2009 | 04:50 PM
  #4  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Every time I see a picture of a diesel engine, I'm reminded of all of the times I've heard diesel proponents argue that diesels are mechanically simpler than gas engines. Boy, they sure don't look simpler!
Old Aug 31, 2009 | 09:10 PM
  #5  
formula79's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,698
From: USA
There is more **** bolted on the engine than there is actual engine. I would thing having the exhaust manifolds inside the V would make the engine run hotter.
Old Aug 31, 2009 | 09:20 PM
  #6  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
I didn't realize Ford did this in house. I can't wait to see some performance numbers.
Old Aug 31, 2009 | 09:24 PM
  #7  
SSbaby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,123
From: Melbourne, Australia
Under Mullaly, it seems to be a marked contrast to how Nasser ran Ford. Ford are returning to an R&D culture by developing more technologies in-house.

I wonder if GM patented that reverse exhaust manifold idea?
Old Sep 1, 2009 | 08:21 AM
  #8  
My Red 93Z-28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,503
From: BFE, Ohio
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
Every time I see a picture of a diesel engine, I'm reminded of all of the times I've heard diesel proponents argue that diesels are mechanically simpler than gas engines. Boy, they sure don't look simpler!
Diesels have come a long way in a rather short period of time. Emissions standards have a lot to do with it.
Old Sep 1, 2009 | 08:23 AM
  #9  
My Red 93Z-28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,503
From: BFE, Ohio
Originally Posted by SSbaby
Under Mullaly, it seems to be a marked contrast to how Nasser ran Ford. Ford are returning to an R&D culture by developing more technologies in-house.

I wonder if GM patented that reverse exhaust manifold idea?
I believe BMW already uses it on their 4.4L Twin Turbo V8, not sure if they were the first to develop it.


Old Sep 1, 2009 | 11:16 AM
  #10  
R377's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,712
From: Ontario
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
Every time I see a picture of a diesel engine, I'm reminded of all of the times I've heard diesel proponents argue that diesels are mechanically simpler than gas engines. Boy, they sure don't look simpler!
Even seen under the beauty cover of a Lexus IS-F gasoline engine?



Gotta love the LSx ....
Old Sep 1, 2009 | 03:40 PM
  #11  
94LightningGal's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,178
From: Payson, AZ USA
MY EYES !!!! MY EYES !!!!!

Egads, what a hideous mess that is.
Old Sep 1, 2009 | 04:06 PM
  #12  
SSCamaro99_3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,179
From: Ballwin, MO
Rumor is 390hp/720tq
Old Sep 1, 2009 | 05:25 PM
  #13  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by R377
Even seen under the beauty cover of a Lexus IS-F gasoline engine?

I don't see an engine in there.
Old Sep 3, 2009 | 07:46 PM
  #14  
95redLT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,505
From: Charleston, WV
That is, until we put the screws to sources close to the project. After many hours of waterboarding, we now know, unofficially, that the official power ratings will be 400 horsepower and 725 pound-feet of torque. As the current 6.4-liter V8 generates 350 hp and 650 lb-ft, the new 6.7 represents a pretty healthy upward jump.
Link
Old Sep 4, 2009 | 05:56 PM
  #15  
eagleknight97's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,495
From: Westmont, IL
Those are some ridiculous power numbers and the further they can get away from International the better IMHO.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:58 PM.