Which engine is better, more powerful? The new GM 3.9 v6 or 3.6? - Page 2 - CamaroZ28.Com Message Board

Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-14-2005, 12:18 AM   #16
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: West Middlesex, pa, usa
Posts: 82
Re: Which engine is better, more powerful? The new GM 3.9 v6 or 3.6?

Originally Posted by rlchv70
Compare the torque curves:



The 3.6L torque is virtually flat across the rpm range. However, the 3.9L torque exceeds the 3.6 at almost all rpm points. Therefore, this is a strong argument that the 3.9L is faster than the 3.6.
That V6 3.6 from the Buick must be in some sort of grandpa tune. Isn't one of the hallmarks of a performance DOHC engine that they make power up high? That thing hits peak torque at 2000 rpm.

Here is the 3.6 in Caddy tune.

I'll take a wild guess that if they were to go for an SS or GTP application they might get more pep out of it than they do for Buick or Caddy.
ol'93formula is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 12:59 AM   #17
Registered User
SSbaby's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,123
Re: Which engine is better, more powerful? The new GM 3.9 v6 or 3.6?

If we're all consistent, we'd opt for the 3.9L. But marketing forces being what they are... Japanese/Euro makers go the complex and expensive route with their engines mainly because fuel is waaay too expensive for their destination markets... be that as it may, their 4 and 6 cyl engines perform just fine with DOHC. V8s are a different ball game, though, I don't think I'd love the 3.6L engine if GM added two more cylinders to it... I'd still prefer my LS1 to a DOHC V8 anyday.
SSbaby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 01:04 AM   #18
Registered User
Z284ever's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicagoland IL
Posts: 16,174
Re: Which engine is better, more powerful? The new GM 3.9 v6 or 3.6?

I was surprised at how smooth the 3.9 drives. It sure feels alot like an old 5.0L L-69.
Z284ever is offline   Reply With Quote

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Project Frankenbird - spring 2015 - D1SC 383 Lt4, advice welcome! LONG dbusch22 Forced Induction 6 10-31-2016 12:09 PM
1996 Chevy Camaro Z28 SS w less than 19k org. miles F'n1996Z28SS Cars For Sale 6 04-02-2015 11:02 PM
F/S Car Audio and Lights XtremeLt1 Car Audio and Electronics 12 09-13-2002 09:50 PM
Is this amp ok? Omega9 Car Audio and Electronics 2 08-02-2002 01:33 AM

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:59 PM.

Copyright © 1996-2017 CamaroZ28.com. All rights reserved. We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.