Edmunds Miata vs Solstice review
Re: Edmunds Miata vs Solstice review
Originally Posted by Threxx
You know, on a similar topic what's even crazier to me is seeing somebody like Car and Driver do a review of 55-80k dollar flagship luxury cars and then give the 7-series top marks because it handles the best. Sheesh... how many 7-series owners are taking their car through the twisties at high speed again? OK and how many of them just want as super stable, quiet, and soft ride again? So who are you recommending the 7-series to over the competition?
The minority or the majority?
The minority or the majority?
Re: Edmunds Miata vs Solstice review
Originally Posted by ckt101
PS 'Fun to drive factor' in automotive journalism is just like 'artistic merit' points in competitive figure skating. It is a bull**** way to give extra marks to the side you want to win.
Anyway, I've criticised journalists enough... for today!
Re: Edmunds Miata vs Solstice review
It's interesting how subjective "fun to drive" can be. Automobile picked the Solstice over the MX-5 based primarily upon the driving experience.
That said, in a world of subjective opinion, I trust that of Automobile far more than that of Edmunds. Let us not forget that these self described "advanced" drivers tested an LS2 GTO and a WRX STi and managed 14.0 and 14.1 second 1/4 mile times respectively
.
That said, in a world of subjective opinion, I trust that of Automobile far more than that of Edmunds. Let us not forget that these self described "advanced" drivers tested an LS2 GTO and a WRX STi and managed 14.0 and 14.1 second 1/4 mile times respectively
.
Re: Edmunds Miata vs Solstice review
In a Motor Trend article, it seems that they more so favored towards the Solstice over the Miata, but obviously every editor has their own biases. The Miata is one of the most boring cars on the market IMO and its design doesn't really show any change over the years. But then again, they added a turbo......so, so exciting
Re: Edmunds Miata vs Solstice review
Originally Posted by jrp4uc
And how many would-be 7-Series owners are concerned with what Car and Driver says?
In that case, the Solstice isn't winning any votes with its less practical trunk. And I'd wager fun is pretty high on the desired quality list for a car like this.
It's not like a Vette where over half the owners are probably wealthy upper-middle aged men have a more practical car to drive when needed and only bought the car to have fun in.
Re: Edmunds Miata vs Solstice review
The way I see it is there's two sides to the bargain price. You can get a sexy, sleek, sporty 2 seater at an econo-car price. That's super duper.
However, they're so cheap, alot, i mean alot of people will have them. You'll see them everywhere and they'll quickly lose the wow factor. Soon they'll go the way of the miata. Hopefully without the girly feeling that the miata has.
However, they're so cheap, alot, i mean alot of people will have them. You'll see them everywhere and they'll quickly lose the wow factor. Soon they'll go the way of the miata. Hopefully without the girly feeling that the miata has.
Last edited by JG/70Z; Sep 23, 2005 at 04:39 PM.
Re: Edmunds Miata vs Solstice review
Well the article did state that the Solstice was as quick around the circuit and slalom course as the Miata, yet stated the Miata as clearly the superior handler. The stopwatch doesn't lie and 'seat of the pants' feel is subjective.
What I also object to in the article was the reference to the slow revving engine in the Solstice. From an engineering perspective, given the engine in the Solstice is a big capacity 2.4L vs only a 2.0L in the Miata, that is understandable. Conversely, it could be argued that the Solstice has more usuable torque but the writer forgave the Miata by noting the engine's torque was well matched to the 6 speed gearbox as opposed to the 5 speeder in the Solstice. Again, the taller gearing helps to explain the slower revving engine.
Sorry, I lied, I had to have another go at the journalist.
What I also object to in the article was the reference to the slow revving engine in the Solstice. From an engineering perspective, given the engine in the Solstice is a big capacity 2.4L vs only a 2.0L in the Miata, that is understandable. Conversely, it could be argued that the Solstice has more usuable torque but the writer forgave the Miata by noting the engine's torque was well matched to the 6 speed gearbox as opposed to the 5 speeder in the Solstice. Again, the taller gearing helps to explain the slower revving engine.
Sorry, I lied, I had to have another go at the journalist.
Last edited by SSbaby; Sep 23, 2005 at 07:51 PM.
Re: Edmunds Miata vs Solstice review
Originally Posted by Threxx
You know, on a similar topic what's even crazier to me is seeing somebody like Car and Driver do a review of 55-80k dollar flagship luxury cars and then give the 7-series top marks because it handles the best. Sheesh... how many 7-series owners are taking their car through the twisties at high speed again? OK and how many of them just want as super stable, quiet, and soft ride again? So who are you recommending the 7-series to over the competition?
The minority or the majority?
The minority or the majority?http://www.caranddriver.com/article....rticle_id=3240
Second Place: Toyota MR2 Spyder
If these two cars were strictly racing machines, the MR2 would be the easy choice...
If these two cars were strictly racing machines, the MR2 would be the easy choice...
Last edited by morb|d; Sep 23, 2005 at 08:58 PM.
Re: Edmunds Miata vs Solstice review
Both Autoweek and Automobile magazine picked the Solstice over the Miata as well. Actually, I don't think I have ever seen another publication pick the Miata over the better car.
Re: Edmunds Miata vs Solstice review
Originally Posted by SNEAKY NEIL
Both Autoweek and Automobile magazine picked the Solstice over the Miata as well. Actually, I don't think I have ever seen another publication pick the Miata over the better car.
Re: Edmunds Miata vs Solstice review
Originally Posted by Threxx
IIt is pretty high on the list relative to most cars, but still you have to realize that in this price and size class the majority of the buyers are going to be somewhat affeminant men and also women who own the car as a daily driver; both groups of which may care a little less about how the car reacts and the absolute limits of handling and more about how it feels just around town having a 'little fun' as well as how comfortable it is.
It's not like a Vette where over half the owners are probably wealthy upper-middle aged men have a more practical car to drive when needed and only bought the car to have fun in.
It's not like a Vette where over half the owners are probably wealthy upper-middle aged men have a more practical car to drive when needed and only bought the car to have fun in.


Both are capable weekend toys and daily drivers; each approach their objectives from slightly different angles.



