Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Dodge Ram SRT-10 (from detnews)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-27-2002, 03:14 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Ken S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: OR
Posts: 2,368
Dodge Ram SRT-10 (from detnews)

http://pc99.detnews.com/autosinsider...x.hbs?myrec=47

Hey GM, you listening? Your Silverado SS is going to get MURDERED unless you add in a SC or better yet, a tuned ver of the new 8.1L bigblock!!!
Ken S is offline  
Old 09-27-2002, 04:19 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
johnsocal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Southern California (SoCal)
Posts: 1,912
That Dodge is going to be great truck, its just too bad that is going to sell for $50,000+
johnsocal is offline  
Old 09-28-2002, 02:16 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Chuck!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 2,612
The difference in HP between the SRT 10 and the Silverado SS is how much HP my car had stock. Thats kind of funny in a sad way.
Chuck! is offline  
Old 09-28-2002, 02:39 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
guionM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The Golden State
Posts: 13,711
Originally posted by Chuck!
The difference in HP between the SRT 10 and the Silverado SS is how much HP my car had stock. Thats kind of funny in a sad way.
Horsepower today has gone crazy.

Just think, that pickup truck has 2 times the horsepower of Corvettes less than 10 years ago!
guionM is offline  
Old 09-28-2002, 08:58 PM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Ken S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: OR
Posts: 2,368
we are living in another hp war! probably the last too..

Your going to see more high end German sedan's with 400+ hp. Already right now, there's a good amount of cars that have, or soon will have 300 hp..

Its a little wierd that there will be sedan's staright from the factory (albiet 3 or 4 times more expensive than my Camaro) that'll keep up or pass my Camaro..

I guess progress is good!
Ken S is offline  
Old 09-29-2002, 01:57 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
Meccadeth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: South Bend, Indiana
Posts: 2,473
Re: Dodge Ram SRT-10 (from detnews)

Originally posted by Ken S
http://pc99.detnews.com/autosinsider...x.hbs?myrec=47

Hey GM, you listening? Your Silverado SS is going to get MURDERED unless you add in a SC or better yet, a tuned ver of the new 8.1L bigblock!!!
Holy **** that thing looks mean!
I want one
Meccadeth is offline  
Old 09-30-2002, 06:16 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
TerrorDome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 161
A car mag. said that truck should go 0-60 in low 5's

don't know the estimated 1/4
TerrorDome is offline  
Old 09-30-2002, 08:51 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
Z28x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 10,287
It will do the 1/4mi. in 12.9

Does anyone know the price of these? I thought that Dodge said they were going to be about $35K, but I keep hearing $50K on message boards. Does anyone have a link to where this 50K number came from?
Z28x is offline  
Old 09-30-2002, 06:04 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
Johnny Hunkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Placentia, CA, USA
Posts: 64
You call that a horsepower war? Calling it a "war" sort of implies there is something close to parity. I chose to call it a massacre.
Johnny Hunkins is offline  
Old 09-30-2002, 06:17 PM
  #10  
Prominent Member
 
Doug Harden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,282
Exclamation But consider GM's standpoint.....

...in the end who do you think will sell more of these trucks?

Both the Lightning and the Dodge are expensive and limited (it is a truck after all) by 2wd and standard cab configuration as compared to the SS Silverado....when it's all said and done, you still bought a truck and it needs to have the utility of such.

Sure the SS might be a tad bit (well a LARGE tad) slower, but GM IS in the business to sell vehicles and I'll bet they waaaay out sell Ford & Dodge.

Besides do they really need a halo truck??

Last edited by Doug Harden; 09-30-2002 at 06:40 PM.
Doug Harden is offline  
Old 09-30-2002, 07:10 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
Johnny Hunkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Placentia, CA, USA
Posts: 64
If the Silverado SS was less exensive than the Lightning, you might actually have an argument there.
Johnny Hunkins is offline  
Old 09-30-2002, 07:16 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
guionM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The Golden State
Posts: 13,711
Originally posted by Johnny Hunkins
If the Silverado SS was less exensive than the Lightning, you might actually have an argument there.
I was going to bring up the same point. Isn't the Silverado SS going to be more expensive than Lightning's $32,075 list price?
guionM is offline  
Old 09-30-2002, 07:37 PM
  #13  
Prominent Member
 
Doug Harden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,282
My bad........

.....I guess I shouldn't have lumped all three issues together with both competitors....

Still say GM will sell loads more than the other two....
Doug Harden is offline  
Old 09-30-2002, 07:54 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
FUTURE_OF_GM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NC
Posts: 632
Exclamation ummmm.......

Sure, I can see the "Chevy think." But we still need something to compete somewhat, whether it be a reg. cab, like the black one, or a MORE POWERFUL ext. cab.

Oh, and we do have a halo truck...... It's called the SSR. Which also needs more *****.
FUTURE_OF_GM is offline  
Old 10-01-2002, 12:44 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
ProudPony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Yadkinville, NC USA
Posts: 3,180
Wink

Hey guys, interesting discussion about the trucks here. You know what is sad, is that we are all losing musclecar sales to the new high-HP trucks because they provide speed AND UTILITY.

I have a truck... I've got to. I live on a farm. I can't go get 250 bales of hay behind a ponycar. I have to haul my household waste to a dumpsite... not happening in the '71 CJ Mach 1. Nor can I haul a showcar on a lowboy trailer behind my 5.0 Sedan.
That being said, I have no interest in going fast (really fast) in a truck. My Superduty with the Powerstroke will pull that SRT-10 all over the asphalt (if I could catch it!! ) and do so while giving me +20 mpg . That's what a truck is to me, just my opinion though.

BUT - some people can't afford both a car AND a truck, so this gives them a "some of both" solution. I can see a need (and a market) for them. Each manufacturer needs a "halo" model to draw interest to their lines too. As far as trucks go, I like the looks of the SRT-10 for sure. I like the Lightning and the SSR too, I just don't want to buy one of them... they don't suit a need for me right now.

One last point of interest... some folks posting here are sensitive to regular cab vs. super cab vs. quad cab. Are you all aware that Ford is now offering the Supercharged 5.4 (Lighning-style HP) in ALL CAB CONFIGURATIONS!?!?
The Supercharged F-150 Harley-Davidson brings in flexibilty in cab configurations, options galore, performance, style, AND the exclusivity factor.

Cool, huh? But I still ain't gotta use for one unless it's pullin' a musclecar on a trailer...
ProudPony is offline  


Quick Reply: Dodge Ram SRT-10 (from detnews)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:49 AM.