Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Corvette and Camaro SS soon to be dead?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 11:17 AM
  #1  
92RS shearn's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 470
From: Wichita, KS
Corvette and Camaro SS soon to be dead?

http://autos.aol.com/article/car-new...se/20090429001

At least according to this journalist, that may be the case. With the government having a controlling stake at GM and the large 'green' initiatives taken by the current administration we may see the death of performance oriented cars being produced by GM and Chrysler.

Bureaucrats have little use for performance-oriented V-8 powered cars, so don't expect cars like the Chevy Corvette, Dodge Viper, Chevrolet Camaro SS, or Dodge Challenger R/T to survive long term. Their survival is no longer tied to customer demand, but to the demands of the government that now controls the product portfolios and development dollars at GM and Chrysler. Recently, GM announced it was killing its Pontiac brand, a concept that seemed to define performance all by itself some decades ago. Now that brand is gone.

Ford Motor Company will also likely be affected. New emissions regulations may keep future V-8 editions of the Mustang in the barn.

According to John Wolkonowicz, Senior Analyst at HIS Global Insight, "With 'the presidents' plan, everything changes in the domestic automotive world. The government will be able to dictate what General Motors and Chrysler can sell. Washington believes it knows what Americans should drive, and this bail out gives them the means to dramatically change the market." Wolkonowicz sees the potential for a significant narrowing of choice in the automotive market. He says, "With the power given them by the bail out, the government can simply mandate certain classes of cars and trucks out of existence, regardless of whether they are popular with American drivers or not."
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 11:26 AM
  #2  
Josh452's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,496
From: Roseville, MI, USA
First one no. Second one, yes.
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 11:31 AM
  #3  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
What vision!





Great way for the govt to give probably the most loyal car buying group out there a reason (and basically force them) to buy an import for performance.
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 11:42 AM
  #4  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Have no doubts, there are those within the government who see an opportunity to not just influence - but dictate which products GM and Chrysler build.

The current internal debate, relates to the fact that the products these government activists want GM and Chrysler to build, are not really what the American consumers want to buy, therefore making GM and Chrysler even more dependant on the government to survive. I guess it worked for Volga -- huh?

What a vicious circle. I hope that mid-term elections in 18 months, can send a signal to some of these socialists currently calling the shots.


I also hope that Ford can keep out of the clutches of government control.
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 11:53 AM
  #5  
My Red 93Z-28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,503
From: BFE, Ohio
Now, when nobody buys the cars the government wanted GM to make, the government will be asking them why they aren't competitive...vicious cycle
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 12:10 PM
  #6  
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,000
From: TX Med Ctr
All of it hinges on if GM stays in business, which I think they will. Corvette will not go because it is profitable. Camaro SS may evolve, but I don't think it will die.
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 12:35 PM
  #7  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California


Let's kill enthusiast driven products like the Corvette and Camaro SS who have proved time and time again that no matter what the economy is doing they will continue to sell day in and day out because consumers will always want them.

Sure, that makes perfectly good sense... in backward-land!
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 12:39 PM
  #8  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
I'd say it's all idle speculation at this point. This writer is laying out a worst-case doomsday scenario for enthusiasts.

Muscle Cars were supposed to be dead after 1970 too. For as many wacked-out environmentalists as there may be on the Hill, there are at least as many who recognize the importance of profit over ideology. I worry about a lot of what our gov't is doing these days, but dictating product plans isn't one of them - yet.

Last edited by Z28Wilson; Apr 29, 2009 at 12:43 PM.
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 12:39 PM
  #9  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
At the end of the day profit wins, neither car is going anywhere while gas is $2 a gallon. By 2015 the world could be a different place. The government would be wise not to ignore peak oil, that problem isn't too many years away. It would be nice to see GM and Chrysler one up Toyota in a world on $6+ gasoline.
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 12:45 PM
  #10  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
What gets me is the author is considered an "enthusiast"...

http://www.thecarconnection.com/author/10001059_rex-roy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rex_Roy

Old Apr 29, 2009 | 02:26 PM
  #11  
Plague's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,448
From: Irving, TX
The gov't won't be running GM. This means nothing really.
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 02:34 PM
  #12  
Josh452's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,496
From: Roseville, MI, USA
Originally Posted by Plague
The gov't won't be running GM. This means nothing really.
The UAW will though.

Hello job creation in the good ol' USA! Time to bring some of those jobs back home and with the UAW and Treasury Department owning 85% of the company expect some pretty significant future manufacturing changes.
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 02:35 PM
  #13  
My Red 93Z-28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,503
From: BFE, Ohio
Originally Posted by Josh452
The UAW will though.
That scares me even more!
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 02:46 PM
  #14  
Plague's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,448
From: Irving, TX
Originally Posted by Josh452
The UAW will though.

Hello job creation in the good ol' USA! Time to bring some of those jobs back home and with the UAW and Treasury Department owning 85% of the company expect some pretty significant future manufacturing changes.
You are right about that. But the UAW will also want GM to survive. Bringing jobs back to the US will just mean more jobs will be lost later. Hopefully they will be able to see things like that.

Besides, the UAW will eventually want to sell the shares to fund VEBA. I don't think that after the gov't sells its shares, that the UAW will have controlling interest. Talk about anti trust if the union owns most of the company. That would surely collapse and end in chapter 7.
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 04:18 PM
  #15  
Ed 2001 SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 499
From: Miami, Fl USA
Originally Posted by my red 93z-28
that scares me even more!
+1




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:40 PM.