Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Colorado packs more muscle for '07.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-22-2006, 12:58 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Z284ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicagoland IL
Posts: 16,179
Colorado packs more muscle for '07.

http://www.cheersandgears.com/forums...topic=8061&hl=
Z284ever is offline  
Old 04-22-2006, 01:20 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
number77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,428
Re: Colorado packs more muscle for '07.

That's nice, but its still not alot of power, especially for a truck.
What GM needs to do, is have a ground effects/hood option with wheels. Have you seen the S-runner/X-runner tacoma's? They should't even bother with puting a v8 in it, as long as some supercharger is available from the dealer.
GM should've of been on that 5 years ago.




Toyota never advertises this truck, that's why no one knows about it, and why it isn't a big seller.

Last edited by number77; 04-22-2006 at 01:28 PM.
number77 is offline  
Old 04-22-2006, 01:25 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
mr00jimbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wet Coast
Posts: 1,241
Re: Colorado packs more muscle for '07.

Well they have the Xtreme right? IMO the Xtreme looks very nice!
mr00jimbo is offline  
Old 04-22-2006, 01:29 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
number77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,428
Re: Colorado packs more muscle for '07.

Originally Posted by mr00jimbo
Well they have the Xtreme right? IMO the Xtreme looks very nice!
I can't find that on the Chevy website. Is it being sold right now?
Actaully, now that I think about it, GM shouldn't consider my opinion. I'm too young to afford one of their cars with options like this.
number77 is offline  
Old 04-22-2006, 01:32 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
mr00jimbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wet Coast
Posts: 1,241
Re: Colorado packs more muscle for '07.

mr00jimbo is offline  
Old 04-22-2006, 01:42 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
number77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,428
Re: Colorado packs more muscle for '07.

Originally Posted by mr00jimbo
Thats GM's deffinition of Extreme?
I can't tell the difference.
number77 is offline  
Old 04-22-2006, 02:56 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
Bud M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 2,915
Re: Colorado packs more muscle for '07.

Well, its extremely yellow
Bud M is offline  
Old 04-22-2006, 03:19 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
2000GTP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Aurora, IL
Posts: 12,312
Re: Colorado packs more muscle for '07.

Originally Posted by number77
Thats GM's deffinition of Extreme?
I can't tell the difference.
Hey, at least the ground effects don't hang a couple of inches off the ground like the old S10 Extreme.
2000GTP is offline  
Old 04-23-2006, 11:11 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
Jason E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Sarasota FL
Posts: 3,375
Re: Colorado packs more muscle for '07.

All the Colorado needs is an LSx motor to make it sell. WHY they keep farting around with the 5 cylinder is beyond me. I've driven quite a few new Dakotas since starting the dealership a month ago, and the ONLY thing significantly better about the Dakota than the Colorado is the engine...

And an engine in a pickup makes all the difference in the world...
Jason E is offline  
Old 04-23-2006, 12:20 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
96_Camaro_B4C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 3,650
Re: Colorado packs more muscle for '07.

Originally Posted by Jason E
All the Colorado needs is an LSx motor to make it sell.
96_Camaro_B4C is offline  
Old 04-23-2006, 02:51 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
91_z28_4me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Pewee Valley, KY
Posts: 4,600
Re: Colorado packs more muscle for '07.

Originally Posted by 96_Camaro_B4C
Did you do work on that one too?
91_z28_4me is offline  
Old 04-24-2006, 08:05 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
Z28x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 10,287
Re: Colorado packs more muscle for '07.

Originally Posted by number77
That's nice, but its still not alot of power, especially for a truck.
In 2004 the Colorados 220HP was the most powerful non-V8 small truck ever built 242HP is right up there with Toyota now and ahead of Dodge and Ford V6 engines.

If this was a 6 cyl. putting out the same HP you would not hear a complaint, but the fact that it is a 5 cyl. freaks people out. Add direct injection and power would be up around 275HP and I bet people would still freak.

Truck buyers love V8s and almost for marketing and customer perception reasons alone GM should put a V8 in this truck. They would sell a lot of V8 ZQ8 and Z71 Colorados.

The added HP is very welcome
Z28x is offline  
Old 04-24-2006, 09:47 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
96_Camaro_B4C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 3,650
Re: Colorado packs more muscle for '07.

Originally Posted by 91_z28_4me
Did you do work on that one too?
I never worked on a GMT355 small block, if there is such a program... ( )

Of course, that doesn't mean other people are not ...

96_Camaro_B4C is offline  
Old 04-24-2006, 09:48 AM
  #14  
Banned
 
anasazi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Milton, FL
Posts: 3,604
Re: Colorado packs more muscle for '07.

i dunno why people hate the exterior of that truck, i think it looks pretty cool.


the interior on the other hand is garbage.
anasazi is offline  
Old 04-24-2006, 10:03 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
96_Camaro_B4C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 3,650
Re: Colorado packs more muscle for '07.

Originally Posted by anasazi
i dunno why people hate the exterior of that truck, i think it looks pretty cool.


the interior on the other hand is garbage.
I think it looks good, too, though I prefer the Canyon's front end.

As for the interior, I think it is "garbage" only when compared to some of the nicer full size trucks (or nicer cars). Compared to an economy car (of which the Colorado is the truck equivalent) or other compact trucks (Tacoma, Frontier, Dakota), I think the interior is fine. The Tacoma might have a little fresher looking dash (mainly in the stereo/hvac head unit area), but ALL of them in that price range use cheap, hard plastics for the dash, doors, etc. The Frontier and Dakota in particular have horrid dashboards (but again, these are cheap, small "econo" trucks, so I'm not expecting a Caddy or Lexus). When the new Frontier, Tacoma, and Dakota debuted all around the same time (basically one season after) the Colorad/Canyon came out, I made a particular point of checking out all of their interiors at NAIAS.

My $0.02.

96_Camaro_B4C is offline  


Quick Reply: Colorado packs more muscle for '07.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:34 AM.