Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Cobalt SS test

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 25, 2008 | 08:52 AM
  #1  
kritzell's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 35
From: VRODville
Cobalt SS test

From Edmunds.

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...hotopanel..1.*
Old Mar 25, 2008 | 09:15 AM
  #2  
96_Camaro_B4C's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,650
From: Indianapolis, IN
Man, Edmunds sucks.

We come to our first serious corner on Glendora Mountain Road, and the 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt SS Coupe delivers the unexpected. It turns into a tight left-hander with the haste and hunger of an import sport compact.
Uh, ok? What does he mean by "import sport compact"? Honda Civic? Mitsu Evo?
At this point, the DIC (GM's awkward way of saying "Driver Information Center") flashes the happy message: "Launch Control."
What is awkward about saying "Dee Eye Sea" instead of "Driver Information Center"?
This is when we feel a twinge of sadness. The Cobalt SS has become a surprisingly cool car, but cool kids aren't going to give it a chance. The SS is stuck in a Cavalier-style body that just doesn't resonate with them. ... But if it were up to us, we'd put all this stuff on the five-door Saturn Astra. Call it a VXR. Call it a Red Line. Either way, it'll outsell the 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt SS coupe.
So, this guy just knows that the "cool" kids aren't going to give it a chance? OK, buddy. Oh, and it would be tough for the Saturn to outsell the Chevy, given the HUGE advantage in terms of the number of dealerships the Chevy enjoys. I agree, though, that I'd like to see this powertrain in the Astra (and I'm sure we will).
The 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt SS uses up just 5.8 seconds accelerating to 60 mph, and it goes through the quarter-mile in 14 seconds flat at 103 mph. This is a night-and-day improvement over the supercharged Cobalt SS, which couldn't break 7 seconds for 60 mph and ran a 15.2-second quarter at 95.6 mph. In fact, the '08 Cobalt SS is, for the moment, the quickest car you can buy under $25,000.
Really? I don't think so. Either he stupidly pulled the numbers from the n/a SS 2.4L, or they REALLY failed at driving the Cobalt SS S/C. Tests I've seen for that car have the 0-60 in either the high fives or the low sixes, with quarter mile times in the low 14s at or near 100 mph.

Has the guy who wrote this review graduated from high school yet?

I would like to see an interior refresh, but it isn't as bad as they make it out to be, IMO. Regardless, the Cobalt SS is going to rock; definitely a top contender for best bang for the buck.
Old Mar 25, 2008 | 10:01 AM
  #3  
Jason E's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,376
From: Sarasota FL
Joe just said all I needed to...I hate Edmunds. And the sad thing is, Edmunds seems to have a significant influence on people's purchases...
Old Mar 25, 2008 | 10:36 AM
  #4  
FiefSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 873
From: Chicago Burbs
Lol at the 15 + second 1/4 mile.. did they have a 5 year old drive the car in the rain with 500lbs of cargo in the car?
Old Mar 25, 2008 | 10:43 AM
  #5  
CheshireCat's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 579
From: Rock Hill, SC
I expect the new Cobalt SS Turbo to be an absolute blast to drive!

That being said, I don't think that the reviewer was that far off...

He had tons of positive things to say about the driving dynamics of the car. As far as the driving experience goes, I don't think there was a negative or even neutral coment about the SS Turbo. He even commented positively about the gas milage...

But like the reviewer said, It's a Cobalt. Chevrolet didn't do much from the exterior to differentiate it from the base Cobalt. They did a great job with the seats, but the dash is basically the same as a cheap rental car...

Like the 4th gen F body, this is going to be a car for people who want to drive fast, corner fast, and stop fast! It makes it's compromises in other areas... And for select group of enthusiast, that's exactly what they want.

I'm looking to get a daily driver this year, and this is on my short list...
Old Mar 25, 2008 | 11:07 AM
  #6  
1990 Turbo Grand Prix's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 764
From: Crystal Falls, MI USA
While I agree with what 96_Camaro_B4C said, the items the Edmunds reviewer mentioned about the high points were the kind of review I have been looking to read.

I've wanted a more head to head comparo against the '05-'07 Supercharged car, and this new turboed model looks to be a considerable improvement in handling, braking, and outright power.

I love my S/C car, but I'm really liking what I see here.
Old Mar 25, 2008 | 11:33 AM
  #7  
skorpion317's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,209
I don't know about anyone else, but I've seen far more Cobalt SS/SC's than Honda Civic Si's. Hell, I've seen almost as many SS/SC's as I have Scion tC's, and just as many VW GTI's. The "cool kids" have definitely been giving the Cobalt a chance.

Also, the reviewer had an epic fail when he tested the SS/SC - a 7 second 0-60 and a 15.2 1/4 time? That's pitiful.
Old Mar 25, 2008 | 09:30 PM
  #8  
Evilfrog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 750
From: Alton IL
Originally Posted by 96_Camaro_B4C
he stupidly pulled the numbers from the n/a SS 2.4L, or they REALLY failed at driving the Cobalt SS S/C. Tests I've seen for that car have the 0-60 in either the high fives or the low sixes, with quarter mile times in the low 14s at or near 100 mph.
Actually the SS/SC is a really hard car to drag race. You have to feather it off the line otherwise you get a lot of wheep hop. And by the time you get it into gear you run out of 1st and shift into 2 a little low. It really takes a few runs to get a handle on it.

I had a few 15.1 and 15.2 passes before I got it down to 14.5.
Old Mar 26, 2008 | 08:27 PM
  #9  
305fan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,308
From: Calgary
damn I wish I could get one--maybe a 4 door---need something to keep me from yawning on my daily commute
Old Mar 27, 2008 | 10:27 AM
  #10  
Privateer454's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 125
There was one intelligent statement though; put that drivetrain into the Saturn Astra.
Old Mar 27, 2008 | 01:13 PM
  #11  
slt's Avatar
slt
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,024
Originally Posted by robvas
They act surprised about the handling?

They rip on it for being a Cobalt, but every other car in the segment is a base model. Sentra, Civic, etc.

Edmunds can kiss my ***.
Unfortunatly, their attitude mirrors the attitude of 90% of the people this car is marketed towards. "yeah, but its still a Cobalt/Cavalier" is a very common phrase. Just like the SRT-4's that never gained real respect and earned the nickname Skittles.
Old Mar 27, 2008 | 02:23 PM
  #12  
STOCK1SC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,049
From: Confederate States of America
Originally Posted by slt
Unfortunatly, their attitude mirrors the attitude of 90% of the people this car is marketed towards. "yeah, but its still a Cobalt/Cavalier" is a very common phrase. Just like the SRT-4's that never gained real respect and earned the nickname Skittles.
Yeah but once the word got out not many people want to run skittle's anymore, they just don't know if they're packing 230hp or over 500hp.
Old Mar 27, 2008 | 02:47 PM
  #13  
Rising Phoenix's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 563
From: Hammer down!
When are these going on sale?
Old Mar 27, 2008 | 02:49 PM
  #14  
Geoff Chadwick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,154
From: All around
Originally Posted by Privateer454
There was one intelligent statement though; put that drivetrain into the Saturn Astra.
Indeed. Also the "cool kids" comment is crap as has been said. I see a *lot* of Cobalts - of all models- more than Civics (of all models). One reason is the Ford Focus and the Chevy Cobalt get much better financing to younger owners. A friend of mine could have leased a new civic for twice the monthly rate of a new focus and would have had to put much more cash down.

GM could have...

DI turbo Cobalt Coupe
DI turbo Cobalt Sedan
DI turbo Astra Hatch
DI turbo HHR Wagon

I think GM would have the FWD "pocket rocket" segment REALLY well covered. All of them sharing the same kick-*** power train.
Old Mar 27, 2008 | 03:10 PM
  #15  
Zigroid's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 948
From: Stroudsburg, PA
Originally Posted by Geoff Chadwick
GM could have...

DI turbo Cobalt Coupe
DI turbo Cobalt Sedan
DI turbo Astra Hatch
DI turbo HHR Wagon

I think GM would have the FWD "pocket rocket" segment REALLY well covered. All of them sharing the same kick-*** power train.
aside from the astra, are they not already doing the other 3?

if I had more cash I would love to pick up a new cobalt SS!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:02 PM.