Chrysler to cut some models
Chrysler to cut some models
http://today.reuters.com/news/articl...1-ArticlePage1
Analysts have said some of the products that could be eliminated include the Jeep Commander, which competes with the Grand Cherokee; the Chrysler Sebring, which competes with the Dodge Avenger; the Chrysler Aspen, which competes with the Dodge Durango, and the Dodge Nitro, which competes with the Jeep Liberty.
Analysts have said some of the products that could be eliminated include the Jeep Commander, which competes with the Grand Cherokee; the Chrysler Sebring, which competes with the Dodge Avenger; the Chrysler Aspen, which competes with the Dodge Durango, and the Dodge Nitro, which competes with the Jeep Liberty.
The Dodge Durango, whose sales have slipped 30 percent this year, could also be eliminated.
The Dodge Durango, whose sales have slipped 30 percent this year, could also be eliminated.
Great ideas! I can't believe how many vehicles they added to the Jeep line-up. I'd eliminate the compass as well, or rename it to another brand (dodge, chrysler). Jeep should be Liberty, Cherokee, and Wrangler. The patriot, compass and commander should be eliminated.
Ultimately, the Jeep line will probably be Wrangler, Patriot and/or Liberty, Grand Cherokee, Grand Cherokee-with-a-third-row, and a small 4x4 pickup.
The Compass makes little sense in Jeep's lineup. It's ridiculously fugly to boot. Axe it.
I'd axe Avenger before Sebring. Yeah, they're essentially the same car, but the Sebring at least has some name cache in it. The name "Sebring" automatically makes me think "popular convertible". The name Avenger makes me think 90's throwaway car.
Many would say that about previous generation Escalades --> Tahoes.
I'd axe Avenger before Sebring. Yeah, they're essentially the same car, but the Sebring at least has some name cache in it. The name "Sebring" automatically makes me think "popular convertible". The name Avenger makes me think 90's throwaway car.
Originally Posted by V8 Slayer
Its an overpriced, chromed out Durango...
Although the Sebring sedan may be under review, you can bet the family farm the Sebring convertible is going nowhere.
Not sure how the new model is doing, but the last one was the most popular convertible sold in the US.
Yes... it even outsold the Mustang convertible.
Not sure how the new model is doing, but the last one was the most popular convertible sold in the US.
Yes... it even outsold the Mustang convertible.
2) Sebring, more than any other single current vehicle, has received a LOT of focus from the new management. There has been serious talk of launching an all-hands crash program to completely redo it, and I would not be surprised to hear that efforts on that front were already underway. One insider posting to Allpar said that it was likely that Sebring would be substantially revised for 09 and all-new for 2010. I don't think it will get killed near-term, but it's not impossible that they'll decide to just shut it down while they come up with a new car.
3) They're clearly going to reposition the Chrysler brand, though it's not clear yet exactly how. If a midsize FWD sedan doesn't fit with their intended positioning, they might just decide to kill it altogether.
Last edited by georgejetson; Oct 18, 2007 at 05:51 AM.
Patriot is selling really well, but it does kind of overlap Liberty. I'm not sure which they'll dump, and it's possible the Liberty and Grand Cherokee will both grow some and they'll keep all three.
Ultimately, the Jeep line will probably be Wrangler, Patriot and/or Liberty, Grand Cherokee, Grand Cherokee-with-a-third-row, and a small 4x4 pickup.
Ultimately, the Jeep line will probably be Wrangler, Patriot and/or Liberty, Grand Cherokee, Grand Cherokee-with-a-third-row, and a small 4x4 pickup.
From my perspective, selling all 3 lines, what do we not need? COMPASS is the one that is completely pointless...as is Commander. Otherwise, Jeep is fine. Dodge is ok IMO...the Caliber sells well (not for us, but for many), the Avenger is needed, as is the Charger, Nitro and maybe the Durango. Durango sales are way down, but GM has proven large SUVs can sell well if done right. For Chrysler, I'd axe the PT Cruiser and possibly the Sebring. I'd rather see a Sebring done RIGHT than not at all, however...
In summary, I can see easily killing 3 current model lines. Above and beyond that, it then gets a little hard. Jeep is SUVs, Dodge is full-line and Chrysler should be near luxury...which to me means a proper Sebring, the 300 is perfect, a decent crossover (Pacifica is dying, but I guess we get a new one off the Journey chassis), a luxury SUV and yes, even that stinking van
It is overlap with the Caravan for sure, but we still sell a ton of them...The one new product I DON'T think we need is a Jeep pickup...why have it? Sure, its a cool idea...but hardly needed.
I don't think they have to ditch everything...not by any stretch. I think its important however to improve interior quality for sure...Chrysler is now where GM was 3 years ago, save for the LXs, Jeep and minivans.
You gotta give Chrysler props for what DOES work. I realize this is a GM focused board by its very nature, but consider: the Wrangler was a runaway success. The Caliber and Patriot are doing extremely well (especially the Patriot). The new vans lead the class all over again...indeed, it is a shrinking market, but its still a volume segment and we're seeing people get out of SUVs and back into vans for better MPG. I have an '08 300C sitting in my driveway right now, and the '08 interior improvements add to what was already a phenomenal car. Despite having the oldest truck, truck sales are still strong.
Granted, there have been some real hiccups too. The Aspen/Durango debacle. The Sebring, and to a lesser extent the Avenger, are yawners. The Compass is asinine. The Commander was an answer to a question no one really asked (can you make a 3rd row Grand Cherokee, and make it look like a gas-swilling mini-H2 while you're at it??). The Magnum is pointless...the car is a non-event in the Northeast.
So yeah, there are issues...but I swear I see some real life, too. The new Liberty is well done IMO. The Patriot is on fire, for us at least. The '09 Ram is gorgeous. The 300 is still, IMO, about the best car under $40k in the US...period. I agree that the CTS is a class act, but until you've driven a 300C on a highway road trip, you don't know what I mean.
Is the lineup as strong as GM's at this point? I'd say no. Interiors are cheaper, and powertrains aren't up to snuff when compared to GM. But a lot of models ARE as good as, if not better than, competing makes. I wouldn't throw everything out, but I think the new management is excellent at figuring out what DOES need to be thrown out...
You gotta give Chrysler props for what DOES work. I realize this is a GM focused board by its very nature, but consider: the Wrangler was a runaway success. The Caliber and Patriot are doing extremely well (especially the Patriot). The new vans lead the class all over again...indeed, it is a shrinking market, but its still a volume segment and we're seeing people get out of SUVs and back into vans for better MPG. I have an '08 300C sitting in my driveway right now, and the '08 interior improvements add to what was already a phenomenal car. Despite having the oldest truck, truck sales are still strong.
Granted, there have been some real hiccups too. The Aspen/Durango debacle. The Sebring, and to a lesser extent the Avenger, are yawners. The Compass is asinine. The Commander was an answer to a question no one really asked (can you make a 3rd row Grand Cherokee, and make it look like a gas-swilling mini-H2 while you're at it??). The Magnum is pointless...the car is a non-event in the Northeast.
So yeah, there are issues...but I swear I see some real life, too. The new Liberty is well done IMO. The Patriot is on fire, for us at least. The '09 Ram is gorgeous. The 300 is still, IMO, about the best car under $40k in the US...period. I agree that the CTS is a class act, but until you've driven a 300C on a highway road trip, you don't know what I mean.
Is the lineup as strong as GM's at this point? I'd say no. Interiors are cheaper, and powertrains aren't up to snuff when compared to GM. But a lot of models ARE as good as, if not better than, competing makes. I wouldn't throw everything out, but I think the new management is excellent at figuring out what DOES need to be thrown out...


