here are the pics in true car form
http://www.alohadreamcars.com/hrssgallery.html

to me its ugly, but it looks really muscular which is appealing.

 

Now:

You are going to see Guy use a "smiley" he's never used before regarding a car design:

just doesn't quite say it for me on this one.

 

Are they aware that GM did infact cease production of the 1970 Chevelle...In 1970?

 

I am sorry that looks NOTHING like my brother in laws 70 Chevelle thank you very much.

I dont think Gm is going to produced the Chevelle Maybe as a concept car but not as a production car. Someone is dreaming.

 

This is what happens when retro goes wrong.

 

I hope that's a joke.

 

That is the worst yet. I mean what the hell were these guys thinking when they saw this car???...It looks good???...come on the front end looks like it was made outta Legos and the rear.......I have nothing else 2 say.

 

Fugly...

 

x2. And to think they butchered a perfectly good classic Chevelle (looks like that was the basis).

 

These Monaro as Chevelles look better.
http://www.chargerclubofwa.asn.au/Vi.../Q440mon03.htm
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill...8/hqholden.jpg

 

Yuck.... definatly retro gone wrong

 

Now I know what happens when a car designer goes on a three day crack binge!

 

That one falls somewhere between abomination and tragedy. It is based off of that lame Hot Rod magazine concept that was then turned into a Photochop of a new GTO, which then became a hack job on a new GTO.

This is probably the worst execution of a half-decent idea I have ever seen. It might be fast, but for what they charge, I'd put that motor in an actual 70.

Kris

 

The tail end is hideous...they tried to hard to make a literal interpretation of the 70 Chevelle.

For that matter the front end is equally, if not more, hideous.

 

I think that if the head lights were angle to match the angle of the grill instead of having the grill cut back. that and if everything else was changed. this thing is fugly