Charger Discussion
Re: Charger Discussion
Originally Posted by Z284ever
When I first saw the Charger in pictures and even in the flesh....I thought it was ghastly. I was convinced that the designers were obviously on acid when they designed it. The 4 door thing didn't really bother me so much. But I just couldn't embrace it, after seeing the '99 concept.
But then something happened. I started noticing an interesting line here a captivating curve there. Do I think the Charger is pretty? No. But every time one drives by, it gets my attention and I'm intrigued.
Maybe the designers were planning that all along.
But then something happened. I started noticing an interesting line here a captivating curve there. Do I think the Charger is pretty? No. But every time one drives by, it gets my attention and I'm intrigued.
Maybe the designers were planning that all along.
I was e-mailed a picture of the NASCAR Charger well before the actual car was unveiled, and it's swoopy front end had me believing the production car would have the same front profile. I refused to believe the Charger would have the nose it did even when C&D ran a drawing of it a month or 2 before the Detroit show. Needless to say I was flabbergasted when I saw C&D had it right.
In pictures the thing looked terrible. At the autoshow, it was intresting, but not the least bit impressive. Then I began seeing the thing on the streets around other cars. That made me do a 180 on it's design.

The car has unbelievable presence. It looks hella mean and muscular, especially in black or dark blue. The most agressive front end since the pre-98 Camaros. Needless to say, I've warmed up to it.....

Originally Posted by Shockwave
The '05's inner body structure's hardpoints wouldn't work with the '99's lines. Also, the '99 was built with the expectation of using a variation of the LH chassis, and so had lower beltlines.
In retrospect, it's all for the better I'd say. If Chrysler stuck with that design, it would be an old design by the time it came out 6 years later.
Re: Charger Discussion
Originally Posted by redzed
The real problem is the "Dukes of Hazard" mentality that surround the so-called sacred name of CHARGER.
The hallowed Chargers of the muscle car era were just facelifted Dodge Coronets and the "Dukes of Hazard" TV-series was only suitable viewing for small children.
Of course, I really liked the "Dukes of Hazard" when I was a preschooler and I still have a hankering for a nice '68 or '69 Charger R/T - black with a black vinyl top just like the baddies' in Bullitt - not orange for cryin' out loud.
The hallowed Chargers of the muscle car era were just facelifted Dodge Coronets and the "Dukes of Hazard" TV-series was only suitable viewing for small children.
Of course, I really liked the "Dukes of Hazard" when I was a preschooler and I still have a hankering for a nice '68 or '69 Charger R/T - black with a black vinyl top just like the baddies' in Bullitt - not orange for cryin' out loud.
Originally Posted by 99Blackt/a
The problem lies in the badge it carries....charger..no way.....they should have called it a magnum sedan and they wouldnt have caught nearly as much flack..a four door charger 

Last edited by JoeliusZ28; Aug 21, 2005 at 05:23 PM.
Re: Charger Discussion
Originally Posted by guionM
The '99 Charger has nothing to do with the 2005 Charger outside the name.
The '05's inner body structure's hardpoints wouldn't work with the '99's lines. Also, the '99 was built with the expectation of using a variation of the LH chassis, and so had lower beltlines.
In retrospect, it's all for the better I'd say. If Chrysler stuck with that design, it would be an old design by the time it came out 6 years later.
The '05's inner body structure's hardpoints wouldn't work with the '99's lines. Also, the '99 was built with the expectation of using a variation of the LH chassis, and so had lower beltlines.
In retrospect, it's all for the better I'd say. If Chrysler stuck with that design, it would be an old design by the time it came out 6 years later.
How long will GM have been working on our RWD V8 design by the time it gets out, espeically if 2009-2010 is the timeframe.
Re: Charger Discussion
Curious how DC will revise the LX line over the years. Will they implement what they learned about high-strength steel and aluminum and try to lighten up the next generation by a couple of hundred pounds? How will the interiors improve over the years? Is the chassis easy to shorten, lengthen or widen?
-B
-B
Re: Charger Discussion
I realize the topic has been covered before.
This was my point as well. I don't think people can grasp the concept that 2 door big coupes don't sell, and DCX is in business to sell cars. Whether people like the styling or not, at least DCX didn't toss us a V6 FWD jellybean like everyone else.
Originally Posted by guionM
and then top it off by making it 4 door in a world where people haven't yet grasped the fact that big coupes equal financial suicide for a car company,
Re: Charger Discussion
I think the 300c looks great..a chysler mercedes type car but very classy and powerful if you want it to be depending on what engine you get.
I like the magnum wagon its cool and powerful and also pretty unique. Not a big fan of the pt crusier but it has some appeal.4 door charger..yep can't get past the 4 door part..magnum sedan would be fine name for it..its pretty boxy and kinda ugly don't really care how much power it has. Don't care if one blows the doors off my car its still a big fast pretty ugly four door sedan to me. They could have made a nice two door out of it..smaller lighter ,mustang competition with 350 hp and 425 engine options would have rocked. But they say they might do it with the challenger in a few years..
mistake I think..they already have a great selling four door in the 300c and the magnum why did they think another 4 door would make a good addition to the line..redundant and have zero interest in every buying one of these things.
Also the neon srt 4 should be offered in 2 door coupe and in awd also. That might even tempt me to mabye get one someday instead of my talon.
But right now would never trade any of my current cars for a big four door charger box. It can have a million horsepower.
I like the magnum wagon its cool and powerful and also pretty unique. Not a big fan of the pt crusier but it has some appeal.4 door charger..yep can't get past the 4 door part..magnum sedan would be fine name for it..its pretty boxy and kinda ugly don't really care how much power it has. Don't care if one blows the doors off my car its still a big fast pretty ugly four door sedan to me. They could have made a nice two door out of it..smaller lighter ,mustang competition with 350 hp and 425 engine options would have rocked. But they say they might do it with the challenger in a few years..
mistake I think..they already have a great selling four door in the 300c and the magnum why did they think another 4 door would make a good addition to the line..redundant and have zero interest in every buying one of these things.
Also the neon srt 4 should be offered in 2 door coupe and in awd also. That might even tempt me to mabye get one someday instead of my talon.
But right now would never trade any of my current cars for a big four door charger box. It can have a million horsepower.
Re: Charger Discussion
My problems with it: WAY TOO HEAVY!!!, NO MANUAL!!!, the four doors sort of bother me, it's stance isn't very good, and the styling, in some colors I think it looks good and others I don't like it...That chrome grille doesn't help, definetly needs to be an option to get all the chrome crap blacked out, I have a hard time excepting it after the '99 concept and the drawing hot rod had in their magazine like 2 years ago...
Re: Charger Discussion
Originally Posted by smackkk
How long will GM have been working on our RWD V8 design by the time it gets out, espeically if 2009-2010 is the timeframe.
That probally means 8-10 years, and counting.
Re: Charger Discussion
I think its a great car, I concur on the too heavy. Maybe a T-56 could help shed 100lbs.
I saw what may have been a charger SRT8 in Royal Oak michgan in june. I thought it was weird that I saw it only a few blocks from what used to be Royal Oak Pontiac (bobcat package). What color was the concept? This was a orangeish red with black stripes. Maybe it was just a funky graphic package, it did have different wheels though.
I saw what may have been a charger SRT8 in Royal Oak michgan in june. I thought it was weird that I saw it only a few blocks from what used to be Royal Oak Pontiac (bobcat package). What color was the concept? This was a orangeish red with black stripes. Maybe it was just a funky graphic package, it did have different wheels though.
Re: Charger Discussion
I have warmed to the style as well, but just because I've warmed to it does not mean that I really LIKE it. I certainly don't LOVE it. It stands out, but not necessarily in a great way. I mean in all honesty, I think an '04+ GP looks as sporty as the Charger, as IMO that nose kills the Charger.
Neither car is a knockout style to me...the Charger is bolder, but I'd rather live with a GP every day. At least I can see out of one!!! I had a customer come in on Saturday after test driving a Charger RT. He was looking for a GXP, and I showed him the closest thing I have right now...an s/c GT. He said he liked the style better, thought the interior looked nicer (imagine that????), and said the power was "perfectly fine." He came in not expecting to look at anything below a GXP, and was surprised by the power of the GT. In his words, "it doesn't snap my neck like the RT, but its still fun." Its also $7k less...
So what did he do? Ordered a GXP from me
With Pontiac quoting a 5.7 0-60 time for the GXP, it appears to be as fast, and his costs $4k less than a loaded Charger RT. Maybe the GP will be ok after all? I thought the Charger would decimate it...
Neither car is a knockout style to me...the Charger is bolder, but I'd rather live with a GP every day. At least I can see out of one!!! I had a customer come in on Saturday after test driving a Charger RT. He was looking for a GXP, and I showed him the closest thing I have right now...an s/c GT. He said he liked the style better, thought the interior looked nicer (imagine that????), and said the power was "perfectly fine." He came in not expecting to look at anything below a GXP, and was surprised by the power of the GT. In his words, "it doesn't snap my neck like the RT, but its still fun." Its also $7k less...
So what did he do? Ordered a GXP from me
With Pontiac quoting a 5.7 0-60 time for the GXP, it appears to be as fast, and his costs $4k less than a loaded Charger RT. Maybe the GP will be ok after all? I thought the Charger would decimate it...
Re: Charger Discussion
I was in Florida for the past week. There are Chargers everywhere! They look better and better to me all the time.
Hell, I even saw the Dukes of Hazard Charger that they were selling on ebay on my way from Orlando to Clearwater. I caught it out of the corner of my eye going the oppisite way. it was behind a white fence but I recognized it immediately and spun the rental Magnum I had around to check it out. It was no where near as bad as it looked in the pics. Not worth what they were asking though.
On a side note, even the v6 Magnum (first v6 lx car I have driven) was pleanty powerful and fun. I like the variants more all the time.
Hell, I even saw the Dukes of Hazard Charger that they were selling on ebay on my way from Orlando to Clearwater. I caught it out of the corner of my eye going the oppisite way. it was behind a white fence but I recognized it immediately and spun the rental Magnum I had around to check it out. It was no where near as bad as it looked in the pics. Not worth what they were asking though.
On a side note, even the v6 Magnum (first v6 lx car I have driven) was pleanty powerful and fun. I like the variants more all the time.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
CARiD
2010 - 2015 Camaro Interior, Exterior, Paint & Body, Electronics/Car Audio
0
Jul 7, 2015 08:19 AM



