Can anyone say Cadillac 16?
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,381
Can anyone say Cadillac 16?
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,712
From: Ontario
Not bad 
. The hood is so long, though, makes you think they could have been better served with a blown V12 instead. Then again, if you want to trump the RR and Maybach V12s, a V16 is the way to go.
On the topic of the Maybach, my god is that thing ugly (worst two-tone paint job evAr!). At least the Caddy 16 has some classy lines to it.
. The hood is so long, though, makes you think they could have been better served with a blown V12 instead. Then again, if you want to trump the RR and Maybach V12s, a V16 is the way to go.On the topic of the Maybach, my god is that thing ugly (worst two-tone paint job evAr!). At least the Caddy 16 has some classy lines to it.
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 564
From: Fletcher, NC, US
My first thought: WTF is up with the lower windows line being higher in the front and lower in the back? That looks completely wrong, like a bad photochop attempt.
I can't find a whole lot I dislike about it, so I have to say it's cool, tentatively. Any more pics?
I can't find a whole lot I dislike about it, so I have to say it's cool, tentatively. Any more pics?
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 681
From: Houston, TX USA
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,712
From: Ontario
To my eyes it has a lot of the Lincoln Mark VII in its rear, especially the sail panels. I'm concerned about what appears to be the lack of space in the passenger compartment, though. People aren't going to pay $300,000 to have the same roominess as a DeVille. But maybe it's just the pictures.
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Originally posted by Chuck!
First time Arts & Science has failed me.
First time Arts & Science has failed me.
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,381
