Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Buh Bye Celica and MR2

Old Jul 18, 2004 | 09:34 PM
  #16  
gtjeff's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 388
From: Racine, WI
Re: Buh Bye Celica and MR2

Originally Posted by Z28Wilson
With mid-engined MR2 now being killed, tell me the business case for a new Fiero-type vehicle over the Solstice again....
Tell that to Lotus and Porsche, who are averaging 58 and 60 mid-engines sold per dealership annually. Funny, you kind of disappeared on the 2 seater sales stall thread.
Old Jul 18, 2004 | 09:58 PM
  #17  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Re: Buh Bye Celica and MR2

Originally Posted by gtjeff
Tell that to Lotus and Porsche, who are averaging 58 and 60 mid-engines sold per dealership annually
Average per dealership? I want to know what the market share is of mid-engined roadsters compared to all 2 seat roadsters being sold. If people want a mid-engined car they know where to get them.

Funny, you kind of disappeared on the 2 seater sales stall thread.
Disappeared, much like the market for a mid-engined 2 seater.

Look, I honestly have NOTHING against Fieros. Despite all the infamous problems it was a car ahead of its time. I just don't see a business case for such a car now, and there isn't any hard data out there that suggests otherwise. THAT is why you won't be seeing a Fiero-type car from GM.
Old Jul 18, 2004 | 10:29 PM
  #18  
muckz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,402
From: Toronto, ON Canada
Re: Buh Bye Celica and MR2

Originally Posted by Steve0
Will the 180hp Celica engine still be produced though? I imagine so, with Lotus using it for the Elise and Exige.
They are using the 180 HP engine in Matrix/Vibe, Corolla, Lotus, Scion, etc...

So yes, it will live on, perhaps in different variations (but on the same theme )
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 11:05 AM
  #19  
jrp4uc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,724
From: Hebron, KY
Re: Buh Bye Celica and MR2

Originally Posted by Z28Wilson
With mid-engined MR2 now being killed, tell me the business case for a new Fiero-type vehicle over the Solstice again....
That's because the MR2 had no usable storage whatsoever and was priced/marked-up as if in a higher class than it was (along with the styling that didn't appeal to all). Plus, I wouldn't be surprised if Toyota adds another such car to the Scion lineup for its youth appeal just as it replaced the Celica with the tC.

The Camaro was also killed. Does that mean there is no business case for a new one?
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 11:23 AM
  #20  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Re: Buh Bye Celica and MR2

Originally Posted by jrp4uc
The Camaro was also killed. Does that mean there is no business case for a new one?
I'm not surprised someone would say this.

When you're talking about a competitor to a car with the potential to move over 200,000 units a year (Mustang), and the other guys across town are tooling up a new 2 door performer of their own (Charger), it's safe to say the argument for a Camaro is logical. On the other hand, Lotus is importing 5,000 or so copies of the new Elise, the Porsche Boxster is already getting spanked by Corvette in sales (dealer number descrepancies or no...if people want a Boxster they aren't THAT hard to find) and the MR2 is soon to be dead.

How many Fiero enthusiasts will keep a new mid-engined machine's sales up...year after year after year?
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 11:34 AM
  #21  
Big Als Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,306
From: Jersey Shore
Re: Buh Bye Celica and MR2

Originally Posted by muckz
They are using the 180 HP engine in Matrix/Vibe, Corolla, Lotus, Scion, etc...

So yes, it will live on, perhaps in different variations (but on the same theme )
Scion? Scion has a 2.4 in the tC, and the 1.5 that makes 103 hp. I havent seen the rev-till-your-dead 1.8.
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 01:05 PM
  #22  
Evil Turbo SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 781
From: Houston TX (Chicago/Evanston IL)
Re: Buh Bye Celica and MR2

The Boxster is getting raped in sales because it offers the least amount of performance for the dollar. The Boxer S is in Z06 price but offers MR2 performance (I know Im fibbing a little) It just doesnt come close in performance to the Chevy that is now gone and replaced with a base car that out everythings the Boxer. If toyota made the MR2 a 30K car that performed close to a base vette they would have sold many more than they have.
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 01:34 PM
  #23  
96_Camaro_B4C's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,650
From: Indianapolis, IN
Re: Buh Bye Celica and MR2

Originally Posted by formula79
The Tc engine is the same as the Celica engine...I think it uses different programing to make better TQ and only 160 HP...

The cams may also be different
No, I believe the tC engine comes from the Camry (160 hp 2.4L). The Celica engine is a 1.8L. Not the same engine. The Celica's top level 1.8L VVT engine is also used by the Matrix XRS and Vibe GT, as well as the aforementioned Lotus Elise.
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 01:37 PM
  #24  
muckz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,402
From: Toronto, ON Canada
Re: Buh Bye Celica and MR2

Originally Posted by Big Als Z
Scion? Scion has a 2.4 in the tC, and the 1.5 that makes 103 hp. I havent seen the rev-till-your-dead 1.8.
Ooops. You're right.

Maybe they'll use it in some future high-performance Scions.
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 01:41 PM
  #25  
Eric77TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,958
From: Kansas City, MO
Re: Buh Bye Celica and MR2

Originally Posted by formula79
The Tc engine is the same as the Celica engine...I think it uses different programing to make better TQ and only 160 HP...

The cams may also be different

The tC engine isn't the Celica engine. It's the 2AZ-FE, the base Camry engine. The Celica GTS powerplant is the 2ZZ-GE. Since it's also used in the Lotus Elise, Matrix XRS, Pontiac Vibe and Corrola XRS I would guess it will continue production.
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 01:42 PM
  #26  
Eric77TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,958
From: Kansas City, MO
Re: Buh Bye Celica and MR2

Dang. Gotta type faster! LOL.
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 08:34 PM
  #27  
Jason E's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,376
From: Sarasota FL
Re: Buh Bye Celica and MR2

Originally Posted by formula79
The Tc engine is the same as the Celica engine...I think it uses different programing to make better TQ and only 160 HP...

The cams may also be different
Uhm, not so much...

The tC uses the 2.4 4 banger out of the Camry...it has little if anything to do with the 1.8L VVTi screamer in the Celica GT and GT-S. The base Celica is 140hp and the GT-S is 180hp...the same engine is in the Matrix XRS and Vibe GTs.

The Celica wishes it had the 2.4...then maybe it would have this thing called TORQUE. All in all, I hate to see Yota get rid of sports cars, but, eh, the Spyder was a little fugly if you ask me...and no Celica might mean more Camaro base model sales
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 11:39 PM
  #28  
Fbodfather's Avatar
ALMIGHTY MEMBER
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,298
From: Detroit, MI USA
Re: Buh Bye Celica and MR2

once again, it's important to look at what the public is buying......trucks continue to sell....

also, the number one reason overall that people buy a sports car is the appearance...performance is number two. (again.....overall......)
If the appearance does not change, there is evidence that sales will drop after 2 and a half to 3 years by as much as 20 percent.

Now...that said....don't assume that GM is ignoring the market. I'd love to talk about future products but am prohibited from doing so. (I'll say this...your voices have been heard.......)
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 11:43 PM
  #29  
NJSPEEDER24
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Buh Bye Celica and MR2

Originally Posted by Red Planet
once again, it's important to look at what the public is buying......trucks continue to sell....

also, the number one reason overall that people buy a sports car is the appearance...performance is number two. (again.....overall......)
If the appearance does not change, there is evidence that sales will drop after 2 and a half to 3 years by as much as 20 percent.

Now...that said....don't assume that GM is ignoring the market. I'd love to talk about future products but am prohibited from doing so. (I'll say this...your voices have been heard.......)
I heart this post
Old Jul 20, 2004 | 12:42 AM
  #30  
AronZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,276
From: Chattanoga & Franklin
Re: Buh Bye Celica and MR2

toyota hasn't made a sports car since the Supra was discontinued. Celica isn't a sports car because its FWD, the MR2 would have been a great ugly sports car if it had 100 more horsepower. Toyota is starting to become like buick, all they sell is bland, bland, and more bland cars.

Also, Toyota is not fautless on their build quailty, my mom has 2000 Avalon.(has absolutey no horsepower) It started to sqeak and rattle at 40K miles, all of the speakers blew after 2 years, the mirrors have fading paint, and the clear coat is coming off the aluminum wheels. This car is garaged kept and washed weekly, there isn't any excuse to have these type of cosmetic problems. Except for the mass airflow meter, it has been very reilalbe for 80K miles.

Last edited by AronZ28; Jul 20, 2004 at 12:47 AM.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:37 PM.