View Poll Results: What Should GM do with the Spring Hill "Saturn" factory?
Convert it into a landfill for all of those plastic body panels.



5
13.89%
Turn it into a museum dedicated to corporate failure.



6
16.67%
Hand the keys over to the nearest UAW member and run away.



8
22.22%
Invest huge amounts of money....as always.



17
47.22%
Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll
Autoweek: GM Ponders What To Do With The Soon To Be ex-Saturn plant at Spring Hill
Re: Autoweek: GM Ponders What To Do With The Soon To Be ex-Saturn plant at Spring Hill
Even though this data is good for GM/Ford I still have to throw up the red flag. The only way this can mean anything to ANYBODY is if you drive/maintain/live in the exact way JD Power does.
Initial Quality is where it's at. That's the ONLY thing you can do to determine "Quality" of manufacturing. Any major defect will reveal itself in the first 90 days. Anything past that is in the Engineering - and how the user operates the vehicle has a large impact on the Engineered components.
And on another note, a vehicle can have excellent Quality, but be a Terrible design. A good Quality vehicle means that you are getting exactly what was engineered after the manufacturing process. The Ford vehicles that are burning peoples houses down could have had EXCELLENT Quality, but it's a bad design.
Just something to think about...
Initial Quality is where it's at. That's the ONLY thing you can do to determine "Quality" of manufacturing. Any major defect will reveal itself in the first 90 days. Anything past that is in the Engineering - and how the user operates the vehicle has a large impact on the Engineered components.
And on another note, a vehicle can have excellent Quality, but be a Terrible design. A good Quality vehicle means that you are getting exactly what was engineered after the manufacturing process. The Ford vehicles that are burning peoples houses down could have had EXCELLENT Quality, but it's a bad design.
Just something to think about...
Last edited by Chrome383Z; Jul 11, 2005 at 08:45 AM.
Re: Autoweek: GM Ponders What To Do With The Soon To Be ex-Saturn plant at Spring Hill
Originally Posted by Chrome383Z
The Ford vehicles that are burning peoples houses down could have had EXCELLENT Quality, but it's a bad design.

By the way, anyone notice how every choice in this poll has a very strong negative connotation? Ohhh yeah, it's a redzed poll.
Re: Autoweek: GM Ponders What To Do With The Soon To Be ex-Saturn plant at Spring Hi
Originally Posted by redzed
It's undeniable that the Corvette Museum is in immediately proximity to the factory. It's equally undeniable that the Corvette Museum wouldn't have existed without GM.
Other than the fact that the Corvette Museum wouldn't exist w/o the Corvette, I don't think the musuem owes GM squat.
Last edited by Chris 96 WS6; Jul 11, 2005 at 12:24 PM.
Re: Autoweek: GM Ponders What To Do With The Soon To Be ex-Saturn plant at Spring Hi
Originally Posted by redzed
Yes, that would be great. It would be even better if you could avoid the "delivery charge" by picking up your new car at the factory. Like that will ever happen. Chevy charges Covette buyers hundred of dollar extra for bothering to pick up their cars at the Bowling Green, KT factory. What a ripoff!
BMW gives you a huge discount for opting for a "European Delivery." Enough to pay for the trans-Atlantic flight and most of a European vacation!
BMW gives you a huge discount for opting for a "European Delivery." Enough to pay for the trans-Atlantic flight and most of a European vacation!
You really like talking out of your *** don't you?
You want to know the reason there is a delivery charge for Museum Delivery?
Answer: the car transporter company and it's drivers union.
The transportation contract GM has for its cars basically mandates this. The transport company and union get a charge no matter if the car is delivered across town or across America. In essense, they are the ones transporting the car across the highway to the museum, and therefore they get their normal cut. Ever Corvette is assessed the delivery charge because it has to be. But you wouldn't know that because you seem to speak first and never ask questions later...
Re: Autoweek: GM Ponders What To Do With The Soon To Be ex-Saturn plant at Spring Hill
Originally Posted by Z28Wilson
By the way, anyone notice how every choice in this poll has a very strong negative connotation? Ohhh yeah, it's a redzed poll.

Re: Autoweek: GM Ponders What To Do With The Soon To Be ex-Saturn plant at Spring Hill
I stand corrected on Nissan vs. Gm quality. My information came from the link I posted where scott settlemire talked about GM quality, his numbers dont match JDpowers and I dont know where he got them. I am happy that quality is up, I was really impressed with the individual segment winners, the S-10 beat the tacoma?? I would have never have thought that. Why dont you ever hear GM advertising that? How about talking about quality instead of giving cars away at employee discount.
As for the GXP vs. SE-R, its gonna take a test track to settle that one, they both have about the same price. Bigdarkfast you act like the GXP would blow the altima away. Its not all in the HP, look at the curb weight, the nissan weighs 270 lbs less AND its a stick. I know from maxima.org that the stick cars put 35 more hp to the pavement than the nissan autos. It's too close to call at the strip, but on a road track the altima has the weight advantage and better balance.
I feel the V-8 was a band aid for the grand prix, the car should be rwd. Everyone who buys one instead of a magnum/charger/300 is sending the wrong message to GM. We want RWD not compromises.
Hey GM bring RWD to Spring Hill and talk about quality and watch your market increase.
As for the GXP vs. SE-R, its gonna take a test track to settle that one, they both have about the same price. Bigdarkfast you act like the GXP would blow the altima away. Its not all in the HP, look at the curb weight, the nissan weighs 270 lbs less AND its a stick. I know from maxima.org that the stick cars put 35 more hp to the pavement than the nissan autos. It's too close to call at the strip, but on a road track the altima has the weight advantage and better balance.
I feel the V-8 was a band aid for the grand prix, the car should be rwd. Everyone who buys one instead of a magnum/charger/300 is sending the wrong message to GM. We want RWD not compromises.
Hey GM bring RWD to Spring Hill and talk about quality and watch your market increase.
Re: Autoweek: GM Ponders What To Do With The Soon To Be ex-Saturn plant at Spring Hi
Originally Posted by muckz
Indeed I would.
Just some FYI.
1. While GM decided to invest between 400 and 500 million into its saturn plant, Nissan invests $400 million to add just one small cross-over vehicle to its sunderland plant. Hidden costs? Crappy engineering? Russian mafia? Take your pick.
The real story
Just some FYI.
1. While GM decided to invest between 400 and 500 million into its saturn plant, Nissan invests $400 million to add just one small cross-over vehicle to its sunderland plant. Hidden costs? Crappy engineering? Russian mafia? Take your pick.
The real story
Originally Posted by muckz
2.
SARS scares Nissan
A newcomer to the scene, Nissan Motor Co. admits SARS virus may seriously set it back as a business. In an attempt to explain such nonsense to the customers, Nissan claims its engineers cannot travel to China for the fear of contracting the disease.
Now, I would normally agree that SARS is no picnic, but does the Japanese automaker really sub-contract its engineering to China? I guess made in China Nissan explains many things [read: the fugly panzer/Murano]. I would watch out for those flying doors on the highway, or death-dealing transmission drop-outs.
SARS scares Nissan
A newcomer to the scene, Nissan Motor Co. admits SARS virus may seriously set it back as a business. In an attempt to explain such nonsense to the customers, Nissan claims its engineers cannot travel to China for the fear of contracting the disease.
Now, I would normally agree that SARS is no picnic, but does the Japanese automaker really sub-contract its engineering to China? I guess made in China Nissan explains many things [read: the fugly panzer/Murano]. I would watch out for those flying doors on the highway, or death-dealing transmission drop-outs.
Originally Posted by muckz
3. Poor Quality at Nissan blamed on workers
News alert: encouraged by its comrades in the chinese communist government, nissan blames poor fit and finish (and other quality problems) of its Titan, Armada and Pathfinder on poor worker productivity, citing such factors as jewellery.
Nissan was known to have problems in the 90's. And also in the 80's. Actually, from its inception in the 30's throughout. Anyhow. It was rescued by Renault, a french automaker (whose home country is famour for the freedom fries), who installed a foreigner Carlos Ghosn. Carlos introduced the Nissan Revival Plan (NRP), which managed to get the automaker out of the craphole it used to be in. Of course, outsourcing to China was part of the plan.
Now, another foreigner, wanting to remain anonymous, provided The Plan for the Nissan. It includes 20 steps among countless others. This Plan will help Nissan return to greatness it never experienced, or was close to experiencing with its venture Tu-Ka . Wishing to share some of its successful roadmap, the foreigner enthusiastically shared point number one: STOP ENGINEERING IN CHINA. Kudos, brave foreigner, kudos!

News alert: encouraged by its comrades in the chinese communist government, nissan blames poor fit and finish (and other quality problems) of its Titan, Armada and Pathfinder on poor worker productivity, citing such factors as jewellery.
Nissan was known to have problems in the 90's. And also in the 80's. Actually, from its inception in the 30's throughout. Anyhow. It was rescued by Renault, a french automaker (whose home country is famour for the freedom fries), who installed a foreigner Carlos Ghosn. Carlos introduced the Nissan Revival Plan (NRP), which managed to get the automaker out of the craphole it used to be in. Of course, outsourcing to China was part of the plan.
Now, another foreigner, wanting to remain anonymous, provided The Plan for the Nissan. It includes 20 steps among countless others. This Plan will help Nissan return to greatness it never experienced, or was close to experiencing with its venture Tu-Ka . Wishing to share some of its successful roadmap, the foreigner enthusiastically shared point number one: STOP ENGINEERING IN CHINA. Kudos, brave foreigner, kudos!

Of course, maybe you're real agenda is stir up anti-Chinese sentiments. Personally, I have nothing but admiration for the responsible and serious way the Chinese obliterated the SARS threat. Similarly, I have a great deal of respect for Chinese engineering abilities - not just the quality workmanship that China's exports have recently shown.
China is the next Japan. It will have whether you like it - or not.
Last edited by redzed; Jul 16, 2005 at 02:23 PM.
Re: Autoweek: GM Ponders What To Do With The Soon To Be ex-Saturn plant at Spring Hi
Originally Posted by 91_z28_4me
It should also be noted that the "poor" Ion has higher customer loyalty than all of Nissan combined!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
May 28, 2015 12:50 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Feb 6, 2015 05:00 PM


