Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

AutoBlog: Chevy Traverse First Drive

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 2, 2008 | 07:22 AM
  #1  
skorpion317's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,209
AutoBlog: Chevy Traverse First Drive

http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/30/f...verse-w-video/

I gotta say, the Traverse is better-looking than its siblings. They compare it to the Toyota Highlander in this article, and the Traverse comes out on top.
Old Jul 2, 2008 | 07:33 AM
  #2  
R377's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,712
From: Ontario
The side profile looks nice, but I still haven't warmed up to the Chevy nose on anything it's appeared on so far.

As for comparing it to its siblings, I'd say the order goes Enclave > Acadia > Traverse > Outlook. Of course we'll have to wait for the Saab and Isuzu versions for a final verdict
Old Jul 2, 2008 | 07:49 AM
  #3  
Geoff Chadwick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,154
From: All around
Originally Posted by R377
The side profile looks nice, but I still haven't warmed up to the Chevy nose on anything it's appeared on so far.
I just recently rented a new Equinox, and after a few days that little SUV really grew on me. The ride and feel was really nice for a little thing... But the Malibu nose also doesnt do much for me either. On something this big it seems odd.

But also I notice the equinox is rated in mpg:

3.4L V6 17/24
3.6L V6 16/24

front-wheel-drive version from 16 to 17 mpg. The highway number, however, remains unchanged at 24 mpg. The numbers for the AWD version are 16 city/23 highway mpg
I wonder how either of these would do with a 4 cylinder or v6 diesel...
Old Jul 2, 2008 | 08:15 AM
  #4  
skorpion317's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,209
The grille on the Traverse looks better than the Malibu's. The cross bar follows the bottom of the headlights, and for some reason it looks more natural.
Old Jul 2, 2008 | 08:46 AM
  #5  
92RS shearn's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 470
From: Wichita, KS
I don't care for that nose much. It looks the to be the worst looking Lambda in my opinion.
Old Jul 8, 2008 | 07:25 PM
  #6  
VladimirSteel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 470
From: Stillwater, OK
glad to see its getting the DI3.6 more hp coupled with better milage makes everything better . Are all of the traverse's siblings getting the DI motor in the future hopefully?
Old Jul 8, 2008 | 07:33 PM
  #7  
Plague's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,448
From: Irving, TX
Originally Posted by VladimirSteel
glad to see its getting the DI3.6 more hp coupled with better milage makes everything better . Are all of the traverse's siblings getting the DI motor in the future hopefully?
Yes, they are all getting the DI motor. The traverse will have 2 different HP ratings for it.
Old Jul 8, 2008 | 11:54 PM
  #8  
dav305z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 757
I cannot believe the Outlook still exists.
Old Jul 9, 2008 | 08:16 AM
  #9  
Plague's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,448
From: Irving, TX
Originally Posted by dav305z
I cannot believe the Outlook still exists.
After the traverse comes out, many people think the outlook will go away.
Old Jul 9, 2008 | 12:43 PM
  #10  
91Z28350's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,011
That was a very positive review! I will admit to liking the Acadias looks more myself, but still a good sign for GM. Even in this day of high fuel prices and desire for high fuel efficient vehicles, people still need to tow. It is the 4400 LB towing rating of the Acadia that kept me from buying one in March.
Old Jul 9, 2008 | 01:02 PM
  #11  
Plague's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,448
From: Irving, TX
Originally Posted by 91Z28350
That was a very positive review! I will admit to liking the Acadias looks more myself, but still a good sign for GM. Even in this day of high fuel prices and desire for high fuel efficient vehicles, people still need to tow. It is the 4400 LB towing rating of the Acadia that kept me from buying one in March.
I agree. I think that the Lambdas are great for people who don't need to tow or don't need to tow very much, which is a lot of people.

The GMT900's are great for people who need to tow more often. They are actually pretty close in interior room.
Old Jul 9, 2008 | 01:21 PM
  #12  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Maybe a Lambda HD will be built to replace the 900 SUVs come 2011. Could they bump the tow rating up to 7000lbs. without adding too much weight?
Old Jul 9, 2008 | 01:53 PM
  #13  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Its driving dynamics are very good for such a large and heavy vehicle, surprising even.
That's the kind of stuff I like to hear.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
F'n1996Z28SS
Cars For Sale
8
Aug 23, 2023 11:19 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Jan 21, 2015 06:10 PM
CARiD
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Jan 14, 2015 04:00 AM
formula79
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
18
Jul 1, 2002 02:39 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:03 PM.