anyone check out that 5th gen concept in the lounge??
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,748
From: New England
anyone check out that 5th gen concept in the lounge??
http://web.camaross.com/forums/showt...threadid=78098
WOW
I think this guy hit it right on the head!
It is very modern..not to to retro..its got cues to say it is a CAMARO..and got the bad boy stance...
Photshop guys..start doing some stuff to it..#6 Sunoco racer..heritage...40th ann. and stuff..SS..stripes and such..go nuts..and see if we as a comunity say built it..
well IMO..I would buy it in a second..no boubt even if it was 35K..lol..still worth it..
WOW
I think this guy hit it right on the head!It is very modern..not to to retro..its got cues to say it is a CAMARO..and got the bad boy stance...
Photshop guys..start doing some stuff to it..#6 Sunoco racer..heritage...40th ann. and stuff..SS..stripes and such..go nuts..and see if we as a comunity say built it..
well IMO..I would buy it in a second..no boubt even if it was 35K..lol..still worth it..
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 373
From: Anywhere but here
Originally posted by jg95z28
I actually have one of the pics as my desktop wall paper at work.
It's a nice computer model, but I think a little too retro to ever see production.
That doesn't mean I wouldn't want one.
I actually have one of the pics as my desktop wall paper at work.
It's a nice computer model, but I think a little too retro to ever see production.
That doesn't mean I wouldn't want one.
Just my .02
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 528
From: The land of ice and snow.
Good lord that really is absolutely bloody fabulous!!!
I would buy that over the new stang. And if it came stuffed with LS6 goodness and the option to not have t-tops, I would buy that over a new Corvette too.
It just blows any of the latest GM concepts out of the water.
I would buy that over the new stang. And if it came stuffed with LS6 goodness and the option to not have t-tops, I would buy that over a new Corvette too.
It just blows any of the latest GM concepts out of the water.
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Originally posted by newby
I don't think it's too retro. Using guionM's definition of retro (which makes a lot of sense), if you took that car back to 1969, I think people would recognize it as a Camaro, but it would DEFINATELY look like it was from the future, not like it was just another 60's car.
Just my .02
I don't think it's too retro. Using guionM's definition of retro (which makes a lot of sense), if you took that car back to 1969, I think people would recognize it as a Camaro, but it would DEFINATELY look like it was from the future, not like it was just another 60's car.
Just my .02
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Originally posted by newby
I don't think it's too retro. Using guionM's definition of retro (which makes a lot of sense), if you took that car back to 1969, I think people would recognize it as a Camaro, but it would DEFINATELY look like it was from the future, not like it was just another 60's car.
Just my .02
I don't think it's too retro. Using guionM's definition of retro (which makes a lot of sense), if you took that car back to 1969, I think people would recognize it as a Camaro, but it would DEFINATELY look like it was from the future, not like it was just another 60's car.
Just my .02
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,121
From: Houston
It needs to lose that little scoop over quarter panels, then its perfect. Id buy one. However one reason I love my 4th gen so much is the fact that it has t-tops. Basically how I see it, Convertible when I want and hard top when I want. I can see a Convertible integrated into this design but not t-tops very well. Someone with talent play around with this pic, its one of the best yet and is a great start.
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 373
From: Anywhere but here
Originally posted by Darth Xed
It might have looked like a future car back in 1969, like you said... which makes it look old and dated to me now, here in 2003, to me at least...
It might have looked like a future car back in 1969, like you said... which makes it look old and dated to me now, here in 2003, to me at least...
But I'd still buy it
