Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles
View Poll Results: If offered a choice...which engine would you choose in a 5th gen Camaro.
210 hp pushrod V6
30
73.17%
230 hp DOHC Turbo I4
11
26.83%
Voters: 41. You may not vote on this poll

Another motor poll

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 7, 2003 | 02:13 PM
  #1  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Another motor poll

Just want to see where everyone is at on this. Sorry no V8 choices....that would be waaay too easy.

Besides, we are operating under the assumption that if you want a V8, you'll get a Z/28.

Last edited by Z284ever; Feb 7, 2003 at 02:21 PM.
Old Feb 7, 2003 | 02:21 PM
  #2  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Awww... you're killing me by putting in different HP ratings... kind of makes it unfair...

How about if they both put out 230hp???
Old Feb 7, 2003 | 02:23 PM
  #3  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally posted by Darth Xed
Awww... you're killing me by putting in different HP ratings... kind of makes it unfair...

How about if they both put out 230hp???
Hey...that wouldn't be fair. I'm using "best guess" realistic numbers.

Sorry......
Old Feb 7, 2003 | 02:25 PM
  #4  
SNEAKY NEIL's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,072
From: Lilburn, GA, USA
I'd still go for the 6................probably is just as fast because of torque ratings and power under the curve compared to the high rpm and peak power of the turbo 4........................all theoretically speaking.
Old Feb 7, 2003 | 02:34 PM
  #5  
Meccadeth's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,472
From: South Bend, Indiana
I think its sinful that the Camaro ever even had a 4-cylinder...
Old Feb 7, 2003 | 02:39 PM
  #6  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally posted by Meccadeth
I think its sinful that the Camaro ever even had a 4-cylinder...
Well think of it this way. For under 100 bucks (more like $3 if you know what to get at Home Depot), you can probably pick up 30-50 hp in the turbo motor....maybe more if it's intercooled.

For the same $100 (or $3), how much nastier can you get the V6 to be?
Old Feb 7, 2003 | 02:43 PM
  #7  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Originally posted by Z284ever
Well think of it this way. For under 100 bucks (more like $3 if you know what to get at Home Depot), you can probably pick up 30-50 hp in the turbo motor....maybe more if it's intercooled.

For the same $100 (or $3), how much nastier can you get the V6 to be?
But that will void your warranty if your motor fails.

I thought the premise was power adder kits offered by the Chevy Dealer anyway...

On that note, the turbo on the 4-banger in your list really isn't from the factory anyway, so that 230 hp figure is just 'potenttial with purchased add-ons'...
Old Feb 7, 2003 | 02:46 PM
  #8  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally posted by Darth Xed
But that will void your warranty if your motor fails.

I thought the premise was power adder kits offered by the Chevy Dealer anyway...

On that note, the turbo on the 4-banger in your list really isn't from the factory anyway, so that 230 hp figure is just 'potenttial with purchased add-ons'...
No,no....I am assuming the turbo to be factory installed.
Old Feb 7, 2003 | 02:55 PM
  #9  
Meccadeth's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,472
From: South Bend, Indiana
You should add "350Z's V6" incase GM has a deal w/ them in the near future
Old Feb 7, 2003 | 02:57 PM
  #10  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Originally posted by Z284ever
No,no....I am assuming the turbo to be factory installed.
OK, but if it's factory installed, doesn't that defeat the whole purpose of what we were talking about there?




I think I am missing something.
Old Feb 7, 2003 | 03:08 PM
  #11  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally posted by Darth Xed




I think I am missing something.
If these two motors were available from the factory..as factory choices.... for a 5th gen Camaro, which would you choose?
Old Feb 7, 2003 | 03:09 PM
  #12  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Originally posted by Z284ever
If these two motors were available from the factory..as factory choices.... for a 5th gen Camaro, which would you choose?
OK, simple enough... I figured you were relating it directly to the other thread... sorry.
Old Feb 7, 2003 | 03:11 PM
  #13  
Chuck!'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 2,610
From: Cincinnati, OH
Ok lets get logical about this.

RP said that the main reason people chose Mustangs over FBodies was because the FBody was too powerful. It seems very illogical to me to then add power to a car thats evidently too powerful for the non-enthuiast.

Plus as with turbo/supercharged engines, for the most part, they required added maintainence which Im sure most V6 owners do not want.

Stick a V6 with 5 more hp than the base Mustang engine in it and call it a day.
Old Feb 7, 2003 | 03:14 PM
  #14  
bigsteve7's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 499
From: Raleigh, NC
95% of car buyers leave their cars stock. For that reason, a motor should not be chosen based on its potential. Only enthusiest would be attracted to such a vehicle and your car sales will suffer. Why would I want a car which could be fast after buying aftermarket parts and voiding my warranty instead of just having a quality powertrain to begin with?
Old Feb 7, 2003 | 03:16 PM
  #15  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally posted by Chuck!
Ok lets get logical about this.

RP said that the main reason people chose Mustangs over FBodies was because the FBody was too powerful. It seems very illogical to me to then add power to a car thats evidently too powerful for the non-enthuiast.

Plus as with turbo/supercharged engines, for the most part, they required added maintainence which Im sure most V6 owners do not want.

Stick a V6 with 5 more hp than the base Mustang engine in it and call it a day.
The V6 could be the prime mover. The Turbo 4 could be the econo/affordable performance upgrade.

And if Ford puts the 250 hp 3.5L Duratec V6 in the Mustang...5hp more than that.... for a Camaro pushrod V6, just ain't gonna happen.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:07 AM.