5th gen insider info
Originally posted by jcamere94z28
sorry, but i think there won't be a bird anymore. Since pontiac has the GTO i don't think they will be missing the bird anymore. It was always looked like a flashy Camaro. But now pontiac its got it own car that is different from the Camaro.
Let's just hope the bird rises from the ashes...
sorry, but i think there won't be a bird anymore. Since pontiac has the GTO i don't think they will be missing the bird anymore. It was always looked like a flashy Camaro. But now pontiac its got it own car that is different from the Camaro.
Let's just hope the bird rises from the ashes...
Good info but I've seen it someplace else.... hmmm...
As for the Firebird... R.I.P. From everything that I've heard so far its gone. The GTO is here and when the Solstice arrives Pontiac will have two seperate models not to mention the G6 coupe/sedan/and convert will completly fill the gap left by the Firebird. For the simple sake of model overlap in GM's lineup and the new direction the GTO will take Pontiac the Firebird must be sacraficed.
As for the Firebird... R.I.P. From everything that I've heard so far its gone. The GTO is here and when the Solstice arrives Pontiac will have two seperate models not to mention the G6 coupe/sedan/and convert will completly fill the gap left by the Firebird. For the simple sake of model overlap in GM's lineup and the new direction the GTO will take Pontiac the Firebird must be sacraficed.
Originally posted by 99SilverSS
Good info but I've seen it someplace else.... hmmm...
As for the Firebird... R.I.P. From everything that I've heard so far its gone. The GTO is here and when the Solstice arrives Pontiac will have two seperate models not to mention the G6 coupe/sedan/and convert will completly fill the gap left by the Firebird. For the simple sake of model overlap in GM's lineup and the new direction the GTO will take Pontiac the Firebird must be sacraficed.
Good info but I've seen it someplace else.... hmmm...
As for the Firebird... R.I.P. From everything that I've heard so far its gone. The GTO is here and when the Solstice arrives Pontiac will have two seperate models not to mention the G6 coupe/sedan/and convert will completly fill the gap left by the Firebird. For the simple sake of model overlap in GM's lineup and the new direction the GTO will take Pontiac the Firebird must be sacraficed.
Originally posted by jcamere94z28
sorry, but i think there won't be a bird anymore. Since pontiac has the GTO i don't think they will be missing the bird anymore. It was always looked like a flashy Camaro. But now pontiac its got it own car that is different from the Camaro.
sorry, but i think there won't be a bird anymore. Since pontiac has the GTO i don't think they will be missing the bird anymore. It was always looked like a flashy Camaro. But now pontiac its got it own car that is different from the Camaro.
Too bad about the Firebird
My first car was a brand new 1973 Firebird Formula 400 (Navaho Orange and white vinal interior) and although my 2000 Z28 is in virtually every way a "better" car, my '73 'bird will always be my favorite.
The thrid and fourth cars I ever owned were a brand new 1976 and 1979 Trans Ams (both "black and gold editions").
Until the fourth generation Camaro/Firebird came out, I always perfered the look of the Firebird...always thought they were just a little better looking than their Camaro counterparts; it was that perception along with the fact that most of my friends bought Camaros that convinced me to buy Firebirds (well, Ok...my family had also always been "Pontiac" people but that was in an era when there was more than a nickle's worth of difference between GM divisions).
All that to say, I'm not surprised if there is no more "Firebird" but what a shame.
Here's to hoping the fifth generation F body will be a truly kick-*** car that retains all the good and deals with all the problems of it's earlier versions!
Bob Armentrout
Nashville, TN
The thrid and fourth cars I ever owned were a brand new 1976 and 1979 Trans Ams (both "black and gold editions").
Until the fourth generation Camaro/Firebird came out, I always perfered the look of the Firebird...always thought they were just a little better looking than their Camaro counterparts; it was that perception along with the fact that most of my friends bought Camaros that convinced me to buy Firebirds (well, Ok...my family had also always been "Pontiac" people but that was in an era when there was more than a nickle's worth of difference between GM divisions).
All that to say, I'm not surprised if there is no more "Firebird" but what a shame.
Here's to hoping the fifth generation F body will be a truly kick-*** car that retains all the good and deals with all the problems of it's earlier versions!
Bob Armentrout
Nashville, TN
"In importing the GTO, GM realized that Holden had expertise and efficiency in designing affordable rear wheel drive cars that they could only wish to have. "
I only just stumbled in here and read that piece. That quote from the article chaps my @ss!!
Fire everyone in Detroit and move GM headquarters to Australia with Holden. No excuse for this crap.
I only just stumbled in here and read that piece. That quote from the article chaps my @ss!!
Fire everyone in Detroit and move GM headquarters to Australia with Holden. No excuse for this crap.
Originally posted by Zerosheaven
is this all TRUE and official?? if so im going to go and pleasure myself out of excitment!!!!!
IS THERE ANY WORD ON THE FIREBIRD AND TRANS AM MODLES??? PLEASE GOD SAY THERE IS!!!
is this all TRUE and official?? if so im going to go and pleasure myself out of excitment!!!!!
IS THERE ANY WORD ON THE FIREBIRD AND TRANS AM MODLES??? PLEASE GOD SAY THERE IS!!!
Originally posted by cmsmith
"In importing the GTO, GM realized that Holden had expertise and efficiency in designing affordable rear wheel drive cars that they could only wish to have. "
I only just stumbled in here and read that piece. That quote from the article chaps my @ss!!
Fire everyone in Detroit and move GM headquarters to Australia with Holden. No excuse for this crap.
"In importing the GTO, GM realized that Holden had expertise and efficiency in designing affordable rear wheel drive cars that they could only wish to have. "
I only just stumbled in here and read that piece. That quote from the article chaps my @ss!!
Fire everyone in Detroit and move GM headquarters to Australia with Holden. No excuse for this crap.
Originally posted by Jackass
I think the gto killed any chance of a firebird.
I think the gto killed any chance of a firebird.
Of course this is the same rep who told me they would not call the Grand Am replacement G6 because it sounded to much like C6, which is the next Corvette. I always double check what he tells me, hahaha.
For some reason I have this feeling they are toying with naming the Solstice the Firebird once it goes into production....weird hunch...I am probaly wrong.
Wasn't the Firebird originally going to be a two seat roadster until GM axed it and put it on the F-car platform?
Originally posted by formula79
Wasn't the Firebird originally going to be a two seat roadster until GM axed it and put it on the F-car platform?
Wasn't the Firebird originally going to be a two seat roadster until GM axed it and put it on the F-car platform?
Original Firebird concepts info
Firebird I
Firebird II
Firebird III
Group
(I know this isn't answering your question
)
Last edited by jrp4uc; Sep 16, 2003 at 02:23 PM.
Yeah, i can see them calling the solstice a firebird. What i meant by the gto killing the firebird was that why build two rwd coupes with v8 engines in the same brand. The gto and firebird would be basically the same car.
Originally posted by Jackass
Yeah, i can see them calling the solstice a firebird. What i meant by the gto killing the firebird was that why build two rwd coupes with v8 engines in the same brand. The gto and firebird would be basically the same car.
Yeah, i can see them calling the solstice a firebird. What i meant by the gto killing the firebird was that why build two rwd coupes with v8 engines in the same brand. The gto and firebird would be basically the same car.
Many Bothan spies died to bring us this information
Well 2007 ladies and gents.....lets see what the car market looks like as by 2005 there will be a sub 30K porche and 1 series RWD BMW
It will be an interesting time for sure......Maybe Nissan will think about finally bringing the Silvia over and compete in the 300+hp RWD market.....$37,000 for the high model
This new 5th gen seems to be a tad pricey for a Camaro
Well 2007 ladies and gents.....lets see what the car market looks like as by 2005 there will be a sub 30K porche and 1 series RWD BMW
It will be an interesting time for sure......Maybe Nissan will think about finally bringing the Silvia over and compete in the 300+hp RWD market.....$37,000 for the high model
This new 5th gen seems to be a tad pricey for a Camaro
Originally posted by cmsmith
"In importing the GTO, GM realized that Holden had expertise and efficiency in designing affordable rear wheel drive cars that they could only wish to have. "
I only just stumbled in here and read that piece. That quote from the article chaps my @ss!!
Fire everyone in Detroit and move GM headquarters to Australia with Holden. No excuse for this crap.
"In importing the GTO, GM realized that Holden had expertise and efficiency in designing affordable rear wheel drive cars that they could only wish to have. "
I only just stumbled in here and read that piece. That quote from the article chaps my @ss!!
Fire everyone in Detroit and move GM headquarters to Australia with Holden. No excuse for this crap.
What's happened since those days, in addion to a regime change at GM, is that one of the people sent to Holden to look into importing the Statesman later made a reccomendation directly to Bob Lutz shortly after his arrival to GM that the Monaro would make a good mid-size muscle car, especially a new GTO.
Also what's happened since then is that GM took a proverbial chainsaw through their midsize & large car plans outside of Cadillac, and completely revised it, incorperating Holden's large RWD revised carline into North America's production plans. Examples:
Impala's 2003 rebody was postponed till 2006, Monte Carlo's rebody for the same year was cancelled with no alternate plan, a full size RWD car is being added to Chevy's lineup, Regal's redesign was sent back to day one, Buick is getting a full sized RWD car, Bonneville was 1st set to be killed after 2004, now 2005 is it's last year set to be replaced by a RWD model, a RWD performance coupe was added to the program, and the return of the Chevy El Camino (likely to be exported from Australia once they are removed from the 25% Tarriffs on imported trucks).
I wouldn't advise firing everyone and moving HQ to Australia (though those of you with a long memory recall I once suggested that exact idea
). Like any business, you have to give the bosses what they want. The old GM regime wasn't intrested in going the extra mile for RWD cars engineered in Australia when we had in their view perfectly good locally done FWD cars to do the job. Those guys are gone to other things, so the group responsible today (they've been on the job for about 2 years) are changing things for the better. Since it takes 3-5 years for new cars to completely work their way through the system, you won't start seeing their work for at least another year.
You don't want to ship out the guys who are actually fixing the shop, do you?

Originally posted by 99SilverSS
Good info but I've seen it someplace else.... hmmm...
Good info but I've seen it someplace else.... hmmm...


