400HP 2010 Mustang GT
#46
even so, let's (hypothetically) say the vette goes up to 450, that still only gives chevy the ability to MAYBE come in at 420-425 hp on the camaro. 425 hp on a 3600-3700 pound camaro will still be very close in performance to a 400 hp 3500 pound GT. of course, all of this is hypo, but it's also rumored that the GT is being sent off to jenny craig. so, it may weigh less than the camaro. we'll see.
#47
even so, let's (hypothetically) say the vette goes up to 450, that still only gives chevy the ability to MAYBE come in at 420-425 hp on the camaro. 425 hp on a 3600-3700 pound camaro will still be very close in performance to a 400 hp 3500 pound GT. of course, all of this is hypo, but it's also rumored that the GT is being sent off to jenny craig. so, it may weigh less than the camaro. we'll see.
#48
I'm still waiting to see the MPG predictions for the new GT. Anybody? With all this supposed insider information when are we going to get a hint towards that?
The current setup does not get good mileage and with the current and future gas price issues, poor mileage is not going to be considered acceptable for a new car purchase.
Not even enthusiasts are immune to a nagging spouse, higher food bill, and other mitigating factors which will turn them away from poor gas mileage.
The current setup does not get good mileage and with the current and future gas price issues, poor mileage is not going to be considered acceptable for a new car purchase.
Not even enthusiasts are immune to a nagging spouse, higher food bill, and other mitigating factors which will turn them away from poor gas mileage.
#49
I'm still waiting to see the MPG predictions for the new GT. Anybody? With all this supposed insider information when are we going to get a hint towards that?
The current setup does not get good mileage and with the current and future gas price issues, poor mileage is not going to be considered acceptable for a new car purchase.
Not even enthusiasts are immune to a nagging spouse, higher food bill, and other mitigating factors which will turn them away from poor gas mileage.
The current setup does not get good mileage and with the current and future gas price issues, poor mileage is not going to be considered acceptable for a new car purchase.
Not even enthusiasts are immune to a nagging spouse, higher food bill, and other mitigating factors which will turn them away from poor gas mileage.
#50
I'd be satisfied with a "it will do better than the current model" or "it will be the same or worse than the current model" type prediction. If we have all this inside information being spilled about the engine's horsepower and chassis weight then I'm guessing somebody knows about potential gearing and should be able to give a reasonable estimate like I stated.
#51
I'd be satisfied with a "it will do better than the current model" or "it will be the same or worse than the current model" type prediction. If we have all this inside information being spilled about the engine's horsepower and chassis weight then I'm guessing somebody knows about potential gearing and should be able to give a reasonable estimate like I stated.
#53
2009 Mustang production started Tuesday, May 27 at the Flat Rock MI plant. Yesterday I saw an orange Mustang with temp tags and a 302 decal on the side. Probably a Boss 302, but I dont know the hp/tq ratings. I guess my anemic 315hp 2008 Bullitt is already obsolete!
#54
i dont know what youre talking about. New engines and refreshed mustangs did not start last month
Last edited by cjmatt; 06-08-2008 at 04:56 PM.
#56
I can't find the thread anymore, but I could've sworn I read one on here that was a copy of Mr. Lutz saying the price of the new Camaro was going to be a premium and wasn't concerned with the GT....which kinda doesn't make sense...but who knows.
If the prices are anywhere near what they were in 02, I'll be buying a GT again in 2011.
#57
Total epic failure? Well, the car disappointed even most MUSTANG fans, so I'd have to say "yeah" .
Faster than?? Hmmmm, maybe I haven't read up enough on them recently, but I thought they were about even, with the old Cobra actually being slightly quicker? (and if not, at least it was a WAY better "bang for the buck").
Back to the topic at hand (400 HP 5.0L 2010 Mustang GT) ..... I'd wager that if they maintain the car's weight around ~35xx lbs, it'll give its "big brother" the GT500 a run for its money! (as it most certainly will an LS1 Camaro as well).
BUT... that would be current GT500, not the future GT500. It's not like that car will stand still either.
#58
Originally Posted by boomer78
About as many Camaro fans will be disappointed with the Z28 then, even it if performs well. Ask anyone who's owned both, and I can guarentee that most will choose the GT500 over the Cobra.
So you're saying that just as many people are going to be disappointed with the Camaro? (a car that pretty much NOBODY knows anything about yet) as the GT500?? Hmmm, so you're admitting that there are people disappointed with the GT500?? (if it's not the GT500's lack-lustre performance, then what are the reasons, do you know???). Nice to know that you have such high expectations for the Camaro already .
AND, you say that most prefer the newer GT500 over the '03/'04 Cobra?? BUT, considering your reasoning for people being disappointed in the next Camaro (certainly, this is because of the power/weight issue?) then I think you've just proved that argument WRONG, because now you're saying that most folks prefer the newer, heavier car?!
Wow, I'm confused!
Originally Posted by boomer78
GT500 is quicker. Not taking away from the Cobra.
Maybe when the re-modelled Mustang GT comes out with its ~400 HP 5.0L, it'll actually perform how most would expect a ~400 HP car to perform?
Last edited by Capn Pete; 06-08-2008 at 04:56 PM.
#59