Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

3 Cool mini cars for Chevy at NY (now w/ pics)

Old Apr 4, 2007 | 03:16 PM
  #16  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Hummer is all about off-road. none of these cars are off-roaders
Old Apr 4, 2007 | 03:25 PM
  #17  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Lutz has already stated you won't see these here.

http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll...51/1148/AUTO01

In an interview with reporters after revealing the three concept cars, GM Vice Chairman Bob Lutz said it currently was unlikely that GM will build any of the triplet concepts for sale in the United States, unless there was a dramatic prolonged increase in fuel prices or an "unforeseen" change in fashion for small cars here.....Lutz noted that the vehicles aren't currently being designed to meet rigorous U.S. safety requirements, another sign the company isn't likely to bring any of the three vehicles designed at GM's South Korean design studio to the U.S. market.
I continue to be amazed at the Big 3's stubborness when it comes to building cars like these. The perception is that GM, Ford and Chrysler build gas guzzlers. They have done nothing to squash that perception. WHY?
Old Apr 4, 2007 | 03:34 PM
  #18  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by Z28Wilson
Lutz has already stated you won't see these here.

http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll...51/1148/AUTO01



I continue to be amazed at the Big 3's stubborness when it comes to building cars like these. The perception is that GM, Ford and Chrysler build gas guzzlers. They have done nothing to squash that perception. WHY?
I hope at least they sell them in Canada and Mexico.
Old Apr 4, 2007 | 04:26 PM
  #19  
97QuasarBlue3.8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,018
Automotive darwinism is playing out. The dumb ones will end up dead simply for refusal to adapt to the changing market.

Wave goodbye to GM as they roll over the edge of the cliff, continuing on in their stubborn ways.
Old Apr 4, 2007 | 04:40 PM
  #20  
centric's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,022
From: Newhall, CA USA
Originally Posted by 97QuasarBlue3.8
Automotive darwinism is playing out. The dumb ones will end up dead simply for refusal to adapt to the changing market.

Wave goodbye to GM as they roll over the edge of the cliff, continuing on in their stubborn ways.
Yeah, when news of three small, fuel-efficient cars reaches an enthusiast community that's focused on performance cars AND THEY LOVE THEM, that's a logical response--announce that you're gonna sell them only in markets other than the US.

HELLO! GM, I want to like you, but sometimes it seems like nobody's home.
Old Apr 4, 2007 | 04:58 PM
  #21  
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,000
From: TX Med Ctr
The Beat is a very interesting name... Honda has used it on a small car too. It is in Gran Turismo 2/4 (Beat the Beat)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_Beat
Old Apr 4, 2007 | 05:24 PM
  #22  
johnsocal's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 1,911
From: Southern California (SoCal)
For what they are I think they look pretty good.
Old Apr 4, 2007 | 06:01 PM
  #23  
97QuasarBlue3.8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,018
Originally Posted by centric
Yeah, when news of three small, fuel-efficient cars reaches an enthusiast community that's focused on performance cars AND THEY LOVE THEM, that's a logical response--announce that you're gonna sell them only in markets other than the US.

HELLO! GM, I want to like you, but sometimes it seems like nobody's home.
Exactly. They've won, at the very least, CONSIDERATION by their hardest-to-please enthusiast community that usually accepts nothing less than about 250hp and RWD. These designs should tell them there's a changing buyers market out there.
Old Apr 4, 2007 | 07:36 PM
  #24  
DvBoard's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 940
From: Southern Indiana
Originally Posted by 97QuasarBlue3.8
Automotive darwinism is playing out. The dumb ones will end up dead simply for refusal to adapt to the changing market.

Wave goodbye to GM as they roll over the edge of the cliff, continuing on in their stubborn ways.
They would sell them here if not for our ever more rediculious "safety" and emission standards.
Old Apr 4, 2007 | 11:23 PM
  #25  
Sixer-Bird's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,215
From: Coppell, Texas
Why the HELL are they having a poll to see which one people would like to see built if they aren't going to offer them here? And what's the purpose of showing them in the US if they won't be available here?!
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 06:04 AM
  #26  
91_z28_4me's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,600
From: Pewee Valley, KY
Originally Posted by Sixer-Bird
Why the HELL are they having a poll to see which one people would like to see built if they aren't going to offer them here? And what's the purpose of showing them in the US if they won't be available here?!
My guess is that all three will be on sale somewhere within the GM world shortly, except maybe the Trax. GM may be seeing what type of minicar the US wants and could use the poll results to build a business case for one or more of these cars. GM would have been better off showing these at a Asian auto show if they weren't going to do something with them here. They will certainly get a better judge of what those markets want than they will the ones here.
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 08:43 AM
  #27  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
I like them all better than an Aveo, HHR or Cobalt
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 10:17 AM
  #28  
SSbaby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,123
From: Melbourne, Australia
Given Toyota's image for fuel efficiency, value and dependability has largely been built on the back of Corolla's success, why don't GM build these vehicles if it's serious about turning it's image around?

Personally, I reckon all three vehicles have a place in GM's lineup. They all look cool, IMO. I was surprised that the Groove was most popular. I voted Beat and my next fave was Trax, which looks like nothing else on the road.

The sad part about GM not building these vehicle is that another manufacturer will be inspired by these designs and actually build them! :-(
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 11:52 AM
  #29  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Originally Posted by Z28Wilson
Lutz has already stated you won't see these here.

http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll...51/1148/AUTO01



I continue to be amazed at the Big 3's stubborness when it comes to building cars like these. The perception is that GM, Ford and Chrysler build gas guzzlers. They have done nothing to squash that perception. WHY?
Same newspaper also had an article that said this:

...GM builds minicars in other markets but hasn't determined if there is a strong enough business to bring the little racers to the United States, Lutz said.

"We have a very strong focus on small cars in the current and future portfolio for the U.S.," Lutz said last week. "The real question is will we build these types of vehicles in the U.S.? Historically, these types of cars haven't done well here. But clearly, things are changing...

GM won't officially speculate if it will bring minicars to America, but the automaker could realistically have them available in the U.S. market by 2009, insiders say."
http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll...62/1148/AUTO01
In another article (the same one you posted?) GM in no way slams the door on the car being imported to the US:

"But the company acknowledged it wasn't likely to bring any of the three South Korean-designed vehicles to the United States anytime soon.
and also says why.....

GM Vice Chairman Bob Lutz said it currently was unlikely that GM will build any of the triplet concepts for sale in the United States, unless there was a dramatic prolonged increase in fuel prices or an "unforeseen" change in fashion for small cars here.
Lutz's comment about the cars not being engineered for US requirements should be taken with a grain of salt....

"Designers include various regions' technical specifications in their plans and then devise ways to build the same exterior while changing some pieces under a vehicle's skin to meet different regulations, said David Lyon, GM's executive director of design for Asia Pacific.

It's easier, for example, to design three bumpers to meet three countries' regulations at the beginning of the process than to re-engineer a vehicle for the United States after it's built for Europe, Lyon said.

"You get better designs when you're involved from the beginning," he said.
Cars like these have traditionally not sold well in the US, and while these cars would sell at comfortable numbers and prices elsewhere, the profit margin here would be razor thin and could easily lose money while at the same time being a modest success.

Personally I strongly disagree with this because the Aveo & Mini are doing very well and cars like these Chevrolets would no doubt sell at greater volume than Aveo, and due to lower pricing and more dealers, sell at more volume than the Mini.

Although the cars aren't being developed to meet US regs (would make the cars unnecessarily heavy in their markets), they are being designed to quickly & easily add US compatability.

Although I feel GM should take the plunge NOW and get the cars here, GM's position is that fuel prices haven't climbed enough to make these cars sell enough to be worthwhile. So, in traditional GM fashion, they'll wait for someone else to make the market case for them.
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 12:00 PM
  #30  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by guionM
Although I feel GM should take the plunge NOW and get the cars here, GM's position is that fuel prices haven't climbed enough to make these cars sell enough to be worthwhile. So, in traditional GM fashion, they'll wait for someone else to make the market case for them.
Unfortunately it takes 3+ years to get a car to market and almost no time for gas prices to go up.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:00 AM.