2013 ponycar shootout! Alpha Camaro vs 'Huntsman' Mustang...
#32
#33
Actually, in the '82 Camaro it would've been slower than that as the Camaro is about 500 lbs. heavier than that Cobalt. While the LNF's 260 lb. ft. is impressive for a 2.0 liter, it can only make a car fast if said car only weighs about 3,000 lbs. or less. For a performance car you would want a weight-to-torque ratio of no more than about 12-1. The LS-1 F-Bods had a 10-1 ratio and for me that's what made mine such a blast to drive.
#34
The point is, a lightweight Camaro, with an LNF variant would be fast and fun - AND be CAFE friendly.
#37
Well, I'll be an old dinosaur of 50 by then. And being a relic, I'll still insist that my ponycar have a V8 available in it. Not just for the HP, which I'm sure the smaller motors will be able to match by then, but for the torque & the torque band, which the smaller motors won't be able to match.
I will not be an old relic by then (31) but will still insist on a V8. Gas is not GM's problem, so they don't need to worry about how I am going to afford gas.
Hell, by 2013, ethanol will be here and who knows what else.
If there is not a V8 option, then I will be happy with classics and a used daily driver.
#38
#39
We should at least wait till the NEXT Mustang & Camaro come out next year before we start jumping ahead to the generation after next and start fantasizing.
#40
This here forum is the "Future Vehicle Discussion" forum.
And these next gen cars will be upon us before we know it.
Last edited by Z284ever; 05-04-2008 at 07:08 PM.
#41
And there are those within GM who would want at least some version(s) of Alpha to package a V8.
#42
You know guys, we've been talking about the 5th gen for almost a decade now. There is a separate forum with 5 sub-forums dedicated to 5th gen discussion on this site. Amongst other things, there is a 5th gen thread going, specifically on the "torque gauge". I mean, please, is that all we can talk about here? I'm burned out already.
This here forum is the "Future Vehicle Discussion" forum.
And these next gen cars will be upon us before we know it.
This here forum is the "Future Vehicle Discussion" forum.
And these next gen cars will be upon us before we know it.
If we're burned out talking about the 5th gen (and trust me, I'm probally just as burned out as you are reading about the subject... we've SEEN some of the topics there lately?! ), there is plenty of other future vehicles to talk about before we even start to speculate about a car that isn't even in the "what-if" stage at GM yet, and isn't likely to show up for nearly another decade.
Once we get burned out talking about the 6th gen the day the 5th gen comes out, do we start talking about the 7th & 8th gen Camaro???
#43
If Charlie's correct, they're actively debating the 6th gen inside GM right now. To me, that makes it germane. Especially in the context of CAFE and $4/gallon gasoline. As in, what will GM do about it, and how will it affect the cars we like to drive?
#44
#45
It would be exceedingly easy to put a V8 in Alpha, especially as young as the program is. The Northstar replacement (UV8) which was halted after the CAFE bullsh*t was small enough to fit into the Lambdas (Acadia Denali and upscale Enclave were supposed to feature it at one time) and Epsilon II cars. Heck, even the W-Body was re-engineered for a V8.
I'm very tired of GM's plans for great product being de-railed. I wish for once, they could catch a break and produce an excellent portfolio of cars. Even if Alpha has a small V8 presence (not many untis produced) I'll buy it and be happy.
Of course, if certain factions within GM have their way; Alpha will be limited to Chevrolet (with a de-tuned Camaro) and Cadillac. IMO, Alpha should benefit those divisions as well as Pontiac and maybe even Buick.
Then again, I don't understand why Zeta and Alpha can't co-exist. Just lighten Zeta and tighten up production.
Last edited by FUTURE_OF_GM; 05-05-2008 at 09:13 AM.