Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

2013 ponycar shootout! Alpha Camaro vs 'Huntsman' Mustang...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-03-2008, 01:39 PM
  #31  
Registered User
 
90 Z28SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: South Bend , IN
Posts: 2,801
Trap speeds in a 2950lb SS Cobalt are 102-103 ...mag times anyways ....back in 82 that woulda been insane in Camaro
90 Z28SS is offline  
Old 05-04-2008, 11:36 AM
  #32  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Z284ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicagoland IL
Posts: 16,179
Originally Posted by 90 Z28SS
Trap speeds in a 2950lb SS Cobalt are 102-103 ...mag times anyways ....back in 82 that woulda been insane in Camaro
For sure. That motor, in an '82 Camaro - in '82 - would have laid waste to the 5.0 Mustang, Corvette and pretty much any other exotic car on the planet.
Z284ever is offline  
Old 05-04-2008, 02:23 PM
  #33  
Registered User
 
Maximum Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 178
Actually, in the '82 Camaro it would've been slower than that as the Camaro is about 500 lbs. heavier than that Cobalt. While the LNF's 260 lb. ft. is impressive for a 2.0 liter, it can only make a car fast if said car only weighs about 3,000 lbs. or less. For a performance car you would want a weight-to-torque ratio of no more than about 12-1. The LS-1 F-Bods had a 10-1 ratio and for me that's what made mine such a blast to drive.
Maximum Bob is offline  
Old 05-04-2008, 02:30 PM
  #34  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Z284ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicagoland IL
Posts: 16,179
Originally Posted by Maximum Bob
Actually, in the '82 Camaro it would've been slower than that as the Camaro is about 500 lbs. heavier than that Cobalt. While the LNF's 260 lb. ft. is impressive for a 2.0 liter, it can only make a car fast if said car only weighs about 3,000 lbs. or less.
It would have weighed more than a Cobalt SS - but not 500 lbs more. That's more loaded with every option, T/A territory.


The point is, a lightweight Camaro, with an LNF variant would be fast and fun - AND be CAFE friendly.
Z284ever is offline  
Old 05-04-2008, 02:50 PM
  #35  
Registered User
 
Maximum Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 178
But since you already have this package, sans the RWD, in the Cobalt, why do you need the Camaro? And I bet GM would look at it the same way.
Maximum Bob is offline  
Old 05-04-2008, 03:27 PM
  #36  
Registered User
 
94LightningGal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Payson, AZ USA
Posts: 1,181
After we are done debating the 2013 pony cars, why don't we move on to the 2030 ones !!!!

Sorry, but this is silly.
94LightningGal is offline  
Old 05-04-2008, 05:38 PM
  #37  
Registered User
 
FUTURE_OF_GM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NC
Posts: 632
Originally Posted by Maximum Bob
Well, I'll be an old dinosaur of 50 by then. And being a relic, I'll still insist that my ponycar have a V8 available in it. Not just for the HP, which I'm sure the smaller motors will be able to match by then, but for the torque & the torque band, which the smaller motors won't be able to match.
AMEN!!!

I will not be an old relic by then (31) but will still insist on a V8. Gas is not GM's problem, so they don't need to worry about how I am going to afford gas.

Hell, by 2013, ethanol will be here and who knows what else.

If there is not a V8 option, then I will be happy with classics and a used daily driver.
FUTURE_OF_GM is offline  
Old 05-04-2008, 05:41 PM
  #38  
Registered User
 
FUTURE_OF_GM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NC
Posts: 632
Originally Posted by Z284ever
Around '12. There will be a whole family of them. Sedans, coupes, convertibles.
I'm not so sure about that... IIRC, Alpha hasn't even "officially" been approved yet.

No V8 option for Alpha = count me out.

Last edited by FUTURE_OF_GM; 05-04-2008 at 05:44 PM.
FUTURE_OF_GM is offline  
Old 05-04-2008, 05:58 PM
  #39  
Registered User
 
guionM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The Golden State
Posts: 13,711
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by 94LightningGal
After we are done debating the 2013 pony cars, why don't we move on to the 2030 ones !!!!

Sorry, but this is silly.
I gotta agree with you.

We should at least wait till the NEXT Mustang & Camaro come out next year before we start jumping ahead to the generation after next and start fantasizing.
guionM is offline  
Old 05-04-2008, 07:01 PM
  #40  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Z284ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicagoland IL
Posts: 16,179
Originally Posted by 94LightningGal
After we are done debating the 2013 pony cars, why don't we move on to the 2030 ones !!!!

Sorry, but this is silly.
Originally Posted by guionM
I gotta agree with you.

We should at least wait till the NEXT Mustang & Camaro come out next year before we start jumping ahead to the generation after next and start fantasizing.
You know guys, we've been talking about the 5th gen for almost a decade now. There is a separate forum with 5 sub-forums dedicated to 5th gen discussion on this site. Amongst other things, there is a 5th gen thread going, specifically on the "torque gauge". I mean, please, is that all we can talk about here? I'm burned out already.

This here forum is the "Future Vehicle Discussion" forum.

And these next gen cars will be upon us before we know it.

Last edited by Z284ever; 05-04-2008 at 07:08 PM.
Z284ever is offline  
Old 05-04-2008, 07:10 PM
  #41  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Z284ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicagoland IL
Posts: 16,179
Originally Posted by FUTURE_OF_GM
I'm not so sure about that... IIRC, Alpha hasn't even "officially" been approved yet.

No V8 option for Alpha = count me out.
Trust me future, they're coming - and in a big way.

And there are those within GM who would want at least some version(s) of Alpha to package a V8.
Z284ever is offline  
Old 05-05-2008, 12:14 AM
  #42  
Registered User
 
guionM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The Golden State
Posts: 13,711
Originally Posted by Z284ever
You know guys, we've been talking about the 5th gen for almost a decade now. There is a separate forum with 5 sub-forums dedicated to 5th gen discussion on this site. Amongst other things, there is a 5th gen thread going, specifically on the "torque gauge". I mean, please, is that all we can talk about here? I'm burned out already.

This here forum is the "Future Vehicle Discussion" forum.

And these next gen cars will be upon us before we know it.
Is a 6th gen Camaro (although the 5th gen isn't even out yet) the only future car on the horizon?

If we're burned out talking about the 5th gen (and trust me, I'm probally just as burned out as you are reading about the subject... we've SEEN some of the topics there lately?! ), there is plenty of other future vehicles to talk about before we even start to speculate about a car that isn't even in the "what-if" stage at GM yet, and isn't likely to show up for nearly another decade.

Once we get burned out talking about the 6th gen the day the 5th gen comes out, do we start talking about the 7th & 8th gen Camaro???
guionM is offline  
Old 05-05-2008, 03:01 AM
  #43  
Registered User
 
teal98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 3,132
If Charlie's correct, they're actively debating the 6th gen inside GM right now. To me, that makes it germane. Especially in the context of CAFE and $4/gallon gasoline. As in, what will GM do about it, and how will it affect the cars we like to drive?
teal98 is offline  
Old 05-05-2008, 07:58 AM
  #44  
Registered User
 
skorpion317's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,209
Originally Posted by guionM
Once we get burned out talking about the 6th gen the day the 5th gen comes out, do we start talking about the 7th & 8the gen Camaro???
God willing, yes. We can only hope that the Camaro lasts into the 7th and 8th generations.
skorpion317 is offline  
Old 05-05-2008, 09:11 AM
  #45  
Registered User
 
FUTURE_OF_GM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NC
Posts: 632
Originally Posted by Z284ever
Trust me future, they're coming - and in a big way.

And there are those within GM who would want at least some version(s) of Alpha to package a V8.
That's what makes me so passionate about it.

It would be exceedingly easy to put a V8 in Alpha, especially as young as the program is. The Northstar replacement (UV8) which was halted after the CAFE bullsh*t was small enough to fit into the Lambdas (Acadia Denali and upscale Enclave were supposed to feature it at one time) and Epsilon II cars. Heck, even the W-Body was re-engineered for a V8.

I'm very tired of GM's plans for great product being de-railed. I wish for once, they could catch a break and produce an excellent portfolio of cars. Even if Alpha has a small V8 presence (not many untis produced) I'll buy it and be happy.

Of course, if certain factions within GM have their way; Alpha will be limited to Chevrolet (with a de-tuned Camaro) and Cadillac. IMO, Alpha should benefit those divisions as well as Pontiac and maybe even Buick.

Then again, I don't understand why Zeta and Alpha can't co-exist. Just lighten Zeta and tighten up production.

Last edited by FUTURE_OF_GM; 05-05-2008 at 09:13 AM.
FUTURE_OF_GM is offline  


Quick Reply: 2013 ponycar shootout! Alpha Camaro vs 'Huntsman' Mustang...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:36 PM.