Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

2010 SRX starts at $6,000 less than the 2009

Old May 27, 2009 | 07:03 PM
  #1  
Z28x's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Thumbs up 2010 SRX starts at $6,000 less than the 2009

http://www.autoblog.com/2009/05/27/c...ced-at-34-155/
Old May 27, 2009 | 07:31 PM
  #2  
Josh452's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,496
From: Roseville, MI, USA
This price is great, absolutely fantastic. I also must say that GM did quite a good job today on the media webcast, the Q&A session was great. They even took one of my questions about the CTS Coupe!

My only concern with price and one that unfortunately they didn't have time to get to is this puts it right in the crosshairs of the Chevrolet Travserse. There have already been people on the Chevy Traverse Forum that have cross shopped a Traverse and SRX, this will go further to step on the toes of the Traverse IMO.
Old May 27, 2009 | 08:25 PM
  #3  
69Camaro327's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 148
From: Southeastern PA
Originally Posted by Josh452
There have already been people on the Chevy Traverse Forum that have cross shopped a Traverse and SRX, this will go further to step on the toes of the Traverse IMO.
Isn't the new SRX smaller than the Traverse though? I know that the current Equinox at least is a good deal smaller than the Traverse inside and out.
Old May 27, 2009 | 08:34 PM
  #4  
Z28x's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by 69Camaro327
Isn't the new SRX smaller than the Traverse though? I know that the current Equinox at least is a good deal smaller than the Traverse inside and out.
Yeah, the SRX is smaller than the Traverse but larger than an Equinox.
Old May 28, 2009 | 02:05 AM
  #5  
Big Als Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,306
From: Jersey Shore
Eh...its about the same size as the new Nox. They are built on similar platforms, the Caddy gets a higher end chassis.

The SRX is a nice car, but lacks a few featuers that should be there in this segment, and also needed to bring in some additional features that dont.
Caddy made a safe RX fighter, but thats going to be a tough nut to crack.
Old May 28, 2009 | 02:23 AM
  #6  
69Camaro327's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 148
From: Southeastern PA
Originally Posted by Big Als Z
The SRX is a nice car, but lacks a few featuers that should be there in this segment, and also needed to bring in some additional features that dont.
Such as? I will readily admit that this is not a segment that I follow. I know the vehicles that are in it, but past that my knowledge of these vehicles is pretty abysmal.
Old May 28, 2009 | 02:30 AM
  #7  
Big Als Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,306
From: Jersey Shore
Someone on GMI pointed out just a few things, from the details to major systems that are lacking to featuers found in other GM vehicles but not in this.

360 Degree Cameras (Infiniti and Nissan have this)

Front Active Parking Sensors (Basically every luxury maker..)

Adaptive Cruise Control (This is old news when it comes to luxury and Fords have it) Automatic Parallel Parking (Lexus, Lincoln and Ford)

Pre-Crash Safety (Mercedes is known for this technology, but Lexus is beginning to implement it)

Automatic High/Lo Beams (Escalade has it, but GM is inconsistent...)

Active Head Restraints (Saab has had the technology for ages, GM just doesn't implement it in any other brand; Hyundia has them...)

Side Repeaters worked into the side mirrors ala Mercedes...
Old May 28, 2009 | 07:29 AM
  #8  
Z28x's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
I'm glad they priced this more like a BRX than a SRX. I think it will be a sales success.
Old May 28, 2009 | 09:40 AM
  #9  
jmsjags's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 101
From: Richmond, VA
so they're makin the cts wagon but not the coupe!? wtf!
Old May 28, 2009 | 10:27 AM
  #10  
detltu's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 658
From: Madisonville, Louisiana
I own an '07 SRX. The new one is a little too small for me. Are there still plans to put the escalade on the same platform as the traverse? That may be where we go for our next SUV. The current Escalade is too big and has too much bling for my taste.
Old May 28, 2009 | 10:29 AM
  #11  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by detltu
I own an '07 SRX. The new one is a little too small for me. Are there still plans to put the escalade on the same platform as the traverse? That may be where we go for our next SUV. The current Escalade is too big and has too much bling for my taste.

I feel the exact same way.

My only problem is that even if Escalade goes on Lambda, I have a hard time seeing myself coughing up presumably significantly more cash for a Lambda Escalade, when I can just go buy an Enclave and get 95% of the same package.

This is all assuming I am willing to give up the RWD biased AWD for a FWD platformed (is that a word?) AWD, but maybe I am making too much out of all that.
Old May 28, 2009 | 10:32 AM
  #12  
97z28/m6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,597
From: oshawa,ontario,canada
Originally Posted by Darth Xed
I feel the exact same way.

My only problem is that even if Escalade goes on Lambda, I have a hard time seeing myself coughing up presumably significantly more cash for a Lambda Escalade, when I can just go buy an Enclave and get 95% of the same package.

This is all assuming I am willing to give up the RWD biased AWD for a FWD platformed (is that a word?) AWD, but maybe I am making too much out of all that.
but even with the current escalade you can do that with the yukon denali.
Old May 28, 2009 | 10:34 AM
  #13  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by 97z28/m6
but even with the current escalade you can do that with the yukon denali.

Absolutely.... and a major reason why I can never see myself buying a current Escalde either.

And for the most part, the same reason why I'd probably never buy a current DTS, with a loaded up Lucerne getting you 95% there as well.
Old May 28, 2009 | 10:35 AM
  #14  
69Camaro327's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 148
From: Southeastern PA
Thanks Big Als Z. The inconsistency GM has with offering features on certain models but not on others is something that has been bothering me for a while. I do not understand how no one can step up and say these features should be spread across the models. If they do step up and mention this and then get shot down by management then that is even worse.

Originally Posted by jmsjags
so they're makin the cts wagon but not the coupe!? wtf!
The Coupe is still on track to come out, but has been delayed slightly. Here's a report from January citing a summer 2010 launch.

http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/26/g...l-summer-2010/

The launch of the Cadillac CTS Coupe, which was supposed to be shown at last year's LA Auto Show, has been pushed back to the summer of 2010. Cadillac's director of communications cited "changes to the overall portfolio" as the reason, which is understandable, but doesn't make us any less happy about having to wait. The CTS Wagon is still on schedule for this spring, as is the SRX for this summer. When the CTS Coupe does arrive, it could either be a 2010 or 2011 model.
Old May 28, 2009 | 10:37 AM
  #15  
Z28x's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by jmsjags
so they're makin the cts wagon but not the coupe!? wtf!
Yeah, I think they have their priorities backwards. Maybe the wagon was cheaper and faster to develop/produce

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:16 AM.