2006 changes
2006 changes
http://eogld.ecomm.gm.com/NASApp/dom...006®ionID=1
A few of the interesting changes I noticed:
GTP dropped - the GT now carries the 3800 S/C V6.
The CSV's now get the 3.9L V6 as an option. For some reason it makes 235hp in every model except the Saturn, which makes 240 - wtf?
A few of the interesting changes I noticed:
GTP dropped - the GT now carries the 3800 S/C V6.
The CSV's now get the 3.9L V6 as an option. For some reason it makes 235hp in every model except the Saturn, which makes 240 - wtf?
Re: 2006 changes
Originally Posted by dav305z
http://eogld.ecomm.gm.com/NASApp/dom...006®ionID=1
GTP dropped - the GT now carries the 3800 S/C V6.
GTP dropped - the GT now carries the 3800 S/C V6.
Re: 2006 changes
I assume that is the 260hp GT?
So the Impala gets the new 200hp 3.5 and 245hp 3.9 with VVT, and 5.3, while the "Performance" and "GM's BMW" gets the 400 year old 3.8.
Maybe to help NVH, they will detune the 3.8 SC motor to 150hp, like they did for the Luceren.
So the Impala gets the new 200hp 3.5 and 245hp 3.9 with VVT, and 5.3, while the "Performance" and "GM's BMW" gets the 400 year old 3.8.
Maybe to help NVH, they will detune the 3.8 SC motor to 150hp, like they did for the Luceren.
Re: 2006 changes
Originally Posted by Big Als Z
I assume that is the 260hp GT?
So the Impala gets the new 200hp 3.5 and 245hp 3.9 with VVT, and 5.3, while the "Performance" and "GM's BMW" gets the 400 year old 3.8.
Maybe to help NVH, they will detune the 3.8 SC motor to 150hp, like they did for the Luceren.
So the Impala gets the new 200hp 3.5 and 245hp 3.9 with VVT, and 5.3, while the "Performance" and "GM's BMW" gets the 400 year old 3.8.
Maybe to help NVH, they will detune the 3.8 SC motor to 150hp, like they did for the Luceren.
For a mid-range, fast car I'd definately go with the GP GT over the LTZ.
Re: 2006 changes
True, the supercharged 3.8 would make a better engine for the GP. Now..if it was only RWD.
Seriously, I thought abotu what would happen if there was no Camaro in a few years, and I said to myself "I want a mild-priced 4dr V8 RWD sedan", and I cnat get that from GM.
Seriously, I thought abotu what would happen if there was no Camaro in a few years, and I said to myself "I want a mild-priced 4dr V8 RWD sedan", and I cnat get that from GM.
Re: 2006 changes
Originally Posted by Z284ever
That's pretty cool that they kept the SC 3800 in the line up.
Performance choice!
Performance choice!
Now my only question is this: if the 4T65-E was really toughened up for the GXP, why not also put it in the GT and thus get rid of that torque management?
Re: 2006 changes
I would take the SC3800 over the almost all the new GM v6's . Now heres to hoping that GXP trans got mated to SC engine as well . The SC GT would definately feel qwicker than an previous GTP less all the pcm babaysitters .
Re: 2006 changes
Originally Posted by Z284ever
That's pretty cool that they kept the SC 3800 in the line up.
Performance choice!
Performance choice!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
crYnOid
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
2
Jul 16, 2004 11:17 AM
2K1SunsetSS
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
2
Aug 8, 2003 04:19 PM



