Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

2005 LaCrosse info

Old Nov 26, 2003 | 10:46 AM
  #1  
formula79's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,698
From: USA
2005 LaCrosse info

From GMInsidenews...but since no one wants to register I will copy and paste

La Crosse

--Models--

CX
CXL
CXS

----Cool Options--

Driver info. Center
Chrome Grille surround with graphite colored inserts
Gold Package
Silver Package9-speakers Monsoon radio and 2 subs!
Remotte vehicle start

--Engine--

3.8L V6 200 HP 230 lb. feet of torque (we did not heard of another option...but I am guessing there will be...more like praying)

--Color--

Sterling Silver
Cashmere
Superior Blue
White
Black
Cardinal Red
Glacier Blue
Steelmist

--Dimensions--

Wheelbase- 110.5
Length- 198.30
Old Nov 26, 2003 | 11:50 AM
  #2  
Donutboy97's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 209
sounds like the current Regal. (which i guess is good since this is what it's being replaced by) but that 200 hp engine better be the base engine, especially when you have the Bonneville, GP, and Impala coming out with about 285 horses in the next couple of years.
Old Nov 26, 2003 | 12:30 PM
  #3  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Originally posted by Donutboy97
sounds like the current Regal. (which i guess is good since this is what it's being replaced by) but that 200 hp engine better be the base engine, especially when you have the Bonneville, GP, and Impala coming out with about 285 horses in the next couple of years.
I agree, an optional 250HP+ V6 is a must.
Old Nov 26, 2003 | 03:41 PM
  #4  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Wink Always look at the concept design, not the car itself.

Anyone ever notice how the LaCrosse concept and the Chevrolet SS concept (by body style only) look like they could be designed on the same body structure?

6 window greenhouse, semi-fast back, similar rear-end structure. The drivetrain & chassis of both concepts aren't production, and aren't meant to be. While the LaCrosse is about mid-size, the SS design is about a scale or 2 larger. The SS concept is also known to be an exageration of a soon to be production design.

Yet both LaCrosse concept and the Chevy SS concept look similar in sheet metal and greenhouse layout, minus the front clip & rear end.

Now....... can anyone tell me, why that is?


Here's some hints:
From the rear:
http://www.conceptcarz.com/folder/ph...ehicleTypeID=0
http://www.conceptcarz.com/folder/ph...ehicleTypeID=0

And from the front:
http://www.conceptcarz.com/folder/ph...ehicleTypeID=0
http://www.conceptcarz.com/folder/ph...ehicleTypeID=0

If you get this, go have yourself a nice cold beer. No one else has picked this up yet, and the SS concept has been out nearly a year.

Last edited by guionM; Nov 26, 2003 at 04:12 PM.
Old Nov 27, 2003 | 07:08 PM
  #5  
Jason E's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,376
From: Sarasota FL
Wouldnt the LaCrosse be a contender for the 5.3? It is an Impala/GP, after all...

Makes sense to me...I thought the 3800 was dying soon???
Old Nov 27, 2003 | 08:54 PM
  #6  
97z28/m6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,597
From: oshawa,ontario,canada
Re: Always look at the concept design, not the car itself.

Originally posted by guionM
Anyone ever notice how the LaCrosse concept and the Chevrolet SS concept (by body style only) look like they could be designed on the same body structure?

6 window greenhouse, semi-fast back, similar rear-end structure. The drivetrain & chassis of both concepts aren't production, and aren't meant to be. While the LaCrosse is about mid-size, the SS design is about a scale or 2 larger. The SS concept is also known to be an exageration of a soon to be production design.

Yet both LaCrosse concept and the Chevy SS concept look similar in sheet metal and greenhouse layout, minus the front clip & rear end.

Now....... can anyone tell me, why that is?


Here's some hints:
From the rear:
http://www.conceptcarz.com/folder/ph...ehicleTypeID=0
http://www.conceptcarz.com/folder/ph...ehicleTypeID=0

And from the front:
http://www.conceptcarz.com/folder/ph...ehicleTypeID=0
http://www.conceptcarz.com/folder/ph...ehicleTypeID=0

If you get this, go have yourself a nice cold beer. No one else has picked this up yet, and the SS concept has been out nearly a year.
Old Nov 27, 2003 | 10:19 PM
  #7  
IMPALA64's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 543
From: GA
Hmmm, maybe the greenhouse on both cars is a preview of the VE design
Old Nov 28, 2003 | 01:35 AM
  #8  
stars1010's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,121
From: Houston
Originally posted by IMPALA64
Hmmm, maybe the greenhouse on both cars is a preview of the VE design
VE is for sure the new Camaro platform right?

So should we expect a similar design structure for the 5th Gen too?
Old Nov 28, 2003 | 11:41 PM
  #9  
Sixer-Bird's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,215
From: Coppell, Texas
Originally posted by stars1010
VE is for sure the new Camaro platform right?

So should we expect a similar design structure for the 5th Gen too?
I think VE and Sigma mass/sigma lite/modular or whatever you want to call it, are different. VE is the V-body update. I could be way off on this though...
Old Nov 29, 2003 | 07:39 AM
  #10  
ckt101's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 385
From: Ontario, Canada
You forgot the biggest LaCrosse news: they will be giving it a different name in Canada because lacrosse is slang for masturbation in quebec
Old Nov 29, 2003 | 10:07 AM
  #11  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Originally posted by ckt101
You forgot the biggest LaCrosse news: they will be giving it a different name in Canada because lacrosse is slang for masturbation in quebec
What wil the Canadian car be named?

Is it all of Canada, or just French speaking Quebec that is getting the renamed car?
Old Nov 29, 2003 | 12:36 PM
  #12  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Originally posted by Sixer-Bird
I think VE and Sigma mass/sigma lite/modular or whatever you want to call it, are different. VE is the V-body update. I could be way off on this though...
"Sigma-lite", "Sigma-mass", Holden's "VE" chassis, GM's modular RWD chassis.

They are all the same thing.

Camaro apparently is not exactly a coupe version of this chassis, but it's likely to use many the same chassis components, and it's quite possible it could be built on the same assembly line.
Old Nov 29, 2003 | 12:49 PM
  #13  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally posted by guionM

Camaro apparently is not exactly a coupe version of this chassis, but it's likely to use many the same chassis components, and it's quite possible it could be built on the same assembly line.
So will Camaro and the next GTO be absolute mechanical clones under the skin.....or will they vary mechanically?
Old Nov 29, 2003 | 01:05 PM
  #14  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
I think they'll be.

I also have a feeling that these 2 (especially the f-body)progressed separately from the rest of the "sigma-mass" effort.
Old Nov 29, 2003 | 01:11 PM
  #15  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
So it will be called F-body?

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:28 AM.